I Threw an Insane Amount of Data at YouTubes Encoders to Brute Force My Way to Better Image Quality @Compusemble
I Threw an Insane Amount of Data at YouTubes Encoders to Brute Force My Way to Better Image Quality  @Compusemble
Uploaded October 2025 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
In many cases, the higher bitrate upload exhibits much better detail and more accurate colors. Where certain parts of the image appear as "blobs" in the lower bitrate upload, the higher bitrate upload is much more defined. This is not always the case, as sometimes the difference can be more subtle, but giving YouTube's encoders more data to work with definitely results in better image quality. This will be nice to have in the usual performance videos, but it will be especially useful in visual comparison videos.

This video compares ProRes HQ (1700 Mbps) captures on an Atomos Ninja uploaded to YouTube as H265 at 750 Mbps vs my previous work flow, which entailed using OBS to capture H265 at 100 Mbps and then uploading to YouTube in H265 at 100 Mbps, which is a fairly common creator workflow. In both cases, the bitrate is higher than the bitrate YouTube recommends for 4K.

The comparison screenshots are taken from the uploaded videos and every video is manually set to 4K.

Why did I use only screenshots and not video? Because recording a screen capture of each uploaded video and then encoding it and uploading it again would just result in further compression and would not give you an idea of the true image quality of each clip. Still shots are a lot less prone to compression artifacts. I tried editing/exporting the original clips side-by-side and uploading, but that seems to compress both sides equally and it does not provide the same quality as uploading each clip separately.

System specs:

➤ MSI GeForce RTX 5090 VANGUARD SOC Launch Edition
➤ Ryzen 7 9800X3D
➤ 64 GB (2x32) G.SKILL Flare X5 DDR5 @ 6200MHz CL30
➤ ASUS ROG STRIX B650E-F GAMING WiFi
➤ Crucial T700 SSD Gen5
➤ Sabrent Rocket 4 Plus-G SSD Gen4
➤ ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro SSD Gen3
➤ Samsung 870 EVO SATA SSD
➤ Atomos Ninja Monitor-Recorder
➤ MSI MAG A1250GL PCIE5 ATX3.1 1250W (Native 12v-2x6)
➤ ARCTIC Liquid Freezer III 360
➤ Phanteks Eclipse P500A DRGB
➤ Windows 11

ABOUT COMPUSEMBLE

PC gaming and PC tech.

CONNECT

➤ Like and share the videos.
➤ Subscribe to the channel and hit the bell icon to get notifications for new videos.
➤ Follow on Twitter: twitter.com/compusemble

#AtomosNinja #OBS #youtube
I Threw an Insane Amount of Data at YouTubes Encoders to Brute Force My Way to Better Image QualityDescent RAY TRACED | Path Traced Global Illumination | 1440pWuchang: Fallen Feathers - PC Performance & Resolution Scaling | The Game Uses Old UE5.1 VersionPragmata PC Demo - Smooth frametime graph on a high-end and on a more modest system! (5090 & 4060)Starfield PC Performance Test | 4K | Ultra Settings | FSR | RX 6950 XT | Ryzen 7 7700X | Gen5 SSDStar Wars Outlaws | First Look at Performance and Various Settings ComparisonsUnreal Engine 5: HDD vs SSDGhost of Tsushima | Native 4K | DLAA | Max SettingsF1 23 Realism Mods | Official TV Leaderboard | Halo HUD | Real SponsorsDirectStorage Sample Measures Performance Impact Of Rendering & Streaming Assets At The Same TimeHalf-Life 2 RTX | Sampler Feedback Streaming On vs Off - HUGE VRAM Savings!Doom Classic: RAY TRACED | Performance Test (gameplay recorded in 1080p) | RTX 3080 Ti
Compusemble |

I Threw an Insane Amount of Data at YouTube's Encoders to Brute Force My Way to Better Image Quality

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER