Creation Myths | I Made Discovery Institute Change Their Junk DNA Argument @CreationMyths | Uploaded May 2024 | Updated October 2024, 4 minutes ago.
The DI junk DNA saga continues. Dr. Jonathan McLatchie published his thoughts on my debate with Dr. Casey Luskin: evolutionnews.org/2024/05/reflections-on-casey-luskins-debate-with-dr-dan
There's a REALLY important bit in there. Important because Dr. McLatchie agrees with something Dr. Luskin said during the debate, and it's quite different from what DI has said in the past. Folks, they're changing their argument around junk DNA in the human genome.
Links
Debate with Dr. Luskin: youtu.be/HB6Ilu5zo4U
Dr. Mclathie’s debate reflections: evolutionnews.org/2024/05/reflections-on-casey-luskins-debate-with-dr-dan
Article about LSS video: evolutionnews.org/2024/03/new-long-story-video-tackles-a-battle-of-predictions-junk-dna
Next Phase of ENCODE: evolutionnews.org/2020/08/next-phase-of-encode-finds-more-functional-information-in-genome-junk
ENCODE 2012: nature.com/articles/nature11247
ENCODE and functional percentage: evolutionnews.org/2015/07/encode_evolutio
Some other DI junk DNA articles:
evolutionnews.org/2024/05/heres-a-far-from-exhaustive-yet-still-exhausting-list-of-papers-discovering-function-for-junk-dna
evolutionnews.org/2024/01/casey-luskin-on-junk-dnas-kuhnian-paradigm-shift
evolutionnews.org/2021/10/scientific-paper-on-repetitive-elements-slams-junk-dna
evolutionnews.org/2021/10/oxford-journal-the-days-of-junk-dna-are-over
(Tell me if you think they mean what Dr. McLatchie says they do!)
This is just a hobby for me, but if you appreciate what I'm doing and want to say thank you, you can contribute here:
patreon.com/creationmyths
paypal.me/creationmyths?locale.x=en_US
And if you want early access to pre-recorded videos, you can become a channel member: youtube.com/channel/UCZmhEtG-QIrmyWoW0M6TIgQ/join
If you disagree with anything in this video and want an opportunity to make your case, email me: creationmythschannel@gmail.com. I'll give you as much time as you want, and then I'll take the time I want to respond, and we can have a conversation.
The DI junk DNA saga continues. Dr. Jonathan McLatchie published his thoughts on my debate with Dr. Casey Luskin: evolutionnews.org/2024/05/reflections-on-casey-luskins-debate-with-dr-dan
There's a REALLY important bit in there. Important because Dr. McLatchie agrees with something Dr. Luskin said during the debate, and it's quite different from what DI has said in the past. Folks, they're changing their argument around junk DNA in the human genome.
Links
Debate with Dr. Luskin: youtu.be/HB6Ilu5zo4U
Dr. Mclathie’s debate reflections: evolutionnews.org/2024/05/reflections-on-casey-luskins-debate-with-dr-dan
Article about LSS video: evolutionnews.org/2024/03/new-long-story-video-tackles-a-battle-of-predictions-junk-dna
Next Phase of ENCODE: evolutionnews.org/2020/08/next-phase-of-encode-finds-more-functional-information-in-genome-junk
ENCODE 2012: nature.com/articles/nature11247
ENCODE and functional percentage: evolutionnews.org/2015/07/encode_evolutio
Some other DI junk DNA articles:
evolutionnews.org/2024/05/heres-a-far-from-exhaustive-yet-still-exhausting-list-of-papers-discovering-function-for-junk-dna
evolutionnews.org/2024/01/casey-luskin-on-junk-dnas-kuhnian-paradigm-shift
evolutionnews.org/2021/10/scientific-paper-on-repetitive-elements-slams-junk-dna
evolutionnews.org/2021/10/oxford-journal-the-days-of-junk-dna-are-over
(Tell me if you think they mean what Dr. McLatchie says they do!)
This is just a hobby for me, but if you appreciate what I'm doing and want to say thank you, you can contribute here:
patreon.com/creationmyths
paypal.me/creationmyths?locale.x=en_US
And if you want early access to pre-recorded videos, you can become a channel member: youtube.com/channel/UCZmhEtG-QIrmyWoW0M6TIgQ/join
If you disagree with anything in this video and want an opportunity to make your case, email me: creationmythschannel@gmail.com. I'll give you as much time as you want, and then I'll take the time I want to respond, and we can have a conversation.
