Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
In this excerpt from Micah Coate’s A Cultish Side of Calvinism (Innovo Publishing, 2011), George Bryson explains why he challenged Calvinism despite recognizing that many who embrace it are sincere and devout believers. Bryson argues that some have been “hoodwinked by spiritual intellectualism”—trading the simple, childlike faith of the gospel for a complex theological system. Drawing on Bryson and Vance, Coate examines the tendency to make salvation a mysterious decree rather than the simple good news presented in Scripture.
In this excerpt from Micah Coate’s A Cultish Side of Calvinism (Innovo Publishing, 2011), George Bryson explains why he challenged Calvinism despite recognizing that many who embrace it are sincere and devout believers. Bryson argues that some have been “hoodwinked by spiritual intellectualism”—trading the simple, childlike faith of the gospel for a complex theological system. Drawing on Bryson and Vance, Coate examines the tendency to make salvation a mysterious decree rather than the simple good news presented in Scripture.



![Determinism: Dividing the Church Since Augustine
The full video this is clipped from [although I added The Church Lady] is here: Dinesh DSouza takes on Calvinism | Leighton Flowers | Soteriology 101
https://youtu.be/NNy7z2qWFmc
This video examines why the doctrine of Calvinistic predestination—particularly double predestination and reprobation—has repeatedly produced intense disagreement within the Christian church. The discussion asks an important historical question: if these doctrines were foundational teachings of the apostles and earliest Christians, why do we find so little evidence of the kind of intense intra-Christian controversy surrounding them before Augustine?
The video looks particularly at Augustines role in the development of theological determinism, including his earlier association with Manichaeism and Neoplatonism, and the later development of his views on predestination. It also considers the historical evidence concerning the early church fathers and their opposition to deterministic ideas associated with Gnosticism and other movements.
The discussion then turns to the modern Calvinist debate and the striking divisions that arise when these doctrines are introduced into churches. Are these disagreements simply evidence that the doctrines are difficult truths that Christians must accept by faith, or do they indicate that something fundamentally different from the teaching of the earliest church has been introduced? The video also examines the problem of “double-speak”—the attempt to hold apparently contradictory propositions together by appealing to Gods mysterious or supposedly different logic.
Ultimately, the video asks viewers to consider a larger question: If Calvinistic determinism was truly a foundational doctrine of Christianity, why is its historical emergence and subsequent divisiveness so pronounced? Rather than simply telling the viewer what to believe, the goal is to examine the historical and theological claims and encourage the viewer to “report, you decide.” Determinism: Dividing the Church Since Augustine](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mhU1GuNGo4w/mqdefault.jpg)

![The [#Woke] Left Hates History (Columbian Exchange)
The [#Woke] Left Hates History (Columbian Exchange) The [#Woke] Left Hates History (Columbian Exchange)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nhA2-E5VIXI/mqdefault.jpg)



![Leighton Flowers Responds to Calvinistic Theodicy via X [Twitter]
Leighton Flowers Responds to Calvinistic Theodicy via X [Twitter] Leighton Flowers Responds to Calvinistic Theodicy via X [Twitter]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/u2_nUZWhADM/mqdefault.jpg)
