Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
The full video this is clipped from [although I added The Church Lady] is here: "Dinesh D'Souza takes on Calvinism | Leighton Flowers | Soteriology 101"
_______
youtu.be/NNy7z2qWFmc
_______
This video examines why the doctrine of Calvinistic predestination—particularly double predestination and reprobation—has repeatedly produced intense disagreement within the Christian church. The discussion asks an important historical question: if these doctrines were foundational teachings of the apostles and earliest Christians, why do we find so little evidence of the kind of intense intra-Christian controversy surrounding them before Augustine?
The video looks particularly at Augustine's role in the development of theological determinism, including his earlier association with Manichaeism and Neoplatonism, and the later development of his views on predestination. It also considers the historical evidence concerning the early church fathers and their opposition to deterministic ideas associated with Gnosticism and other movements.
The discussion then turns to the modern Calvinist debate and the striking divisions that arise when these doctrines are introduced into churches. Are these disagreements simply evidence that the doctrines are difficult truths that Christians must accept by faith, or do they indicate that something fundamentally different from the teaching of the earliest church has been introduced? The video also examines the problem of “double-speak”—the attempt to hold apparently contradictory propositions together by appealing to God's mysterious or supposedly different logic.
Ultimately, the video asks viewers to consider a larger question: If Calvinistic determinism was truly a foundational doctrine of Christianity, why is its historical emergence and subsequent divisiveness so pronounced? Rather than simply telling the viewer what to believe, the goal is to examine the historical and theological claims and encourage the viewer to “report, you decide.”
The full video this is clipped from [although I added The Church Lady] is here: "Dinesh D'Souza takes on Calvinism | Leighton Flowers | Soteriology 101"
_______
youtu.be/NNy7z2qWFmc
_______
This video examines why the doctrine of Calvinistic predestination—particularly double predestination and reprobation—has repeatedly produced intense disagreement within the Christian church. The discussion asks an important historical question: if these doctrines were foundational teachings of the apostles and earliest Christians, why do we find so little evidence of the kind of intense intra-Christian controversy surrounding them before Augustine?
The video looks particularly at Augustine's role in the development of theological determinism, including his earlier association with Manichaeism and Neoplatonism, and the later development of his views on predestination. It also considers the historical evidence concerning the early church fathers and their opposition to deterministic ideas associated with Gnosticism and other movements.
The discussion then turns to the modern Calvinist debate and the striking divisions that arise when these doctrines are introduced into churches. Are these disagreements simply evidence that the doctrines are difficult truths that Christians must accept by faith, or do they indicate that something fundamentally different from the teaching of the earliest church has been introduced? The video also examines the problem of “double-speak”—the attempt to hold apparently contradictory propositions together by appealing to God's mysterious or supposedly different logic.
Ultimately, the video asks viewers to consider a larger question: If Calvinistic determinism was truly a foundational doctrine of Christianity, why is its historical emergence and subsequent divisiveness so pronounced? Rather than simply telling the viewer what to believe, the goal is to examine the historical and theological claims and encourage the viewer to “report, you decide.”

![The [#Woke] Left Hates History (Columbian Exchange)
The [#Woke] Left Hates History (Columbian Exchange) The [#Woke] Left Hates History (Columbian Exchange)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nhA2-E5VIXI/mqdefault.jpg)



![Leighton Flowers Responds to Calvinistic Theodicy via X [Twitter]
Leighton Flowers Responds to Calvinistic Theodicy via X [Twitter] Leighton Flowers Responds to Calvinistic Theodicy via X [Twitter]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/u2_nUZWhADM/mqdefault.jpg)




