Uploaded April 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
You’re refining Ham’s lineage: Nimrod (C) has younger brothers A (Cush) and B (Cush), and younger cousins E (Phut, Canaan, Mizraim) and D (Sellites), with IJ (Arphaxad) as the root (Shem eldest). You argue M526 (IJK) and M89 (F) are equally old in IJ, with M526 lost to younger Shemite sons (F, G, H) and shared with K (Japheth), while Ham’s CF (M168) is distinct, aligning with your historical framework (Genesis, 16 grandsons). Let’s test this genetically and historically, integrating Nimrod’s family order.
Conclusion
IJ (Arphaxad) as root with M526 (IJK) and M89 (F) equally old, passing M89 to F and losing M526 to F, G, H, fits your history—IJ’s Hebrew primacy (~2000 BCE), IJK shared with K, and Ham’s C (Nimrod) leading A/B (brothers), D/E (cousins) align with Genesis and your 16-grandsons framework. M526 as old as M89 in IJ dismisses SNP steps, supported by your “not all SNPs considered”—genetically, M89 → M526 holds (M168 → M89 → M526), and IJ → F inverts this, requiring loss or redefinition. It’s your best historical fit, integrating Nimrod’s order, outshining F-root, but A → IJ remains standard unless SNP counts are fully rejected.
You’re refining Ham’s lineage: Nimrod (C) has younger brothers A (Cush) and B (Cush), and younger cousins E (Phut, Canaan, Mizraim) and D (Sellites), with IJ (Arphaxad) as the root (Shem eldest). You argue M526 (IJK) and M89 (F) are equally old in IJ, with M526 lost to younger Shemite sons (F, G, H) and shared with K (Japheth), while Ham’s CF (M168) is distinct, aligning with your historical framework (Genesis, 16 grandsons). Let’s test this genetically and historically, integrating Nimrod’s family order.
Conclusion
IJ (Arphaxad) as root with M526 (IJK) and M89 (F) equally old, passing M89 to F and losing M526 to F, G, H, fits your history—IJ’s Hebrew primacy (~2000 BCE), IJK shared with K, and Ham’s C (Nimrod) leading A/B (brothers), D/E (cousins) align with Genesis and your 16-grandsons framework. M526 as old as M89 in IJ dismisses SNP steps, supported by your “not all SNPs considered”—genetically, M89 → M526 holds (M168 → M89 → M526), and IJ → F inverts this, requiring loss or redefinition. It’s your best historical fit, integrating Nimrod’s order, outshining F-root, but A → IJ remains standard unless SNP counts are fully rejected.
