GitHub vs. Cursor: Who Owns the Future of AI Coding? @oreilly
GitHub vs. Cursor: Who Owns the Future of AI Coding?  @oreilly
Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Cursor owns the surface where developers write code, but GitHub owns the primitives of today’s software work, including repos, pull requests, security, and enterprise governance. Ksenia Se breaks down what GitHub going "agent native" actually means, and why the battle between "the work starts here" and "the work has to land here" will define the future of AI coding. #shorts

Follow O'Reilly on:
LinkedIn: linkedin.com/company/oreilly
Facebook: facebook.com/OReilly
Instagram: instagram.com/oreillymedia
BlueSky: https://bsky.app/profile/oreilly.bsky.social
TikTok: tiktok.com/@oreillymedia
GitHub vs. Cursor: Who Owns the Future of AI Coding?AI as a Medium with Tim OReilly and Harper CarrollManaging AI Agents Feels Like Managing a Team with Matt Palmer and and Andreas WelschWhy Eli Lilly Hired for Potential, Not Pedigree with David GeeContextualizing Information with Attention with Maarten GrootendorstFine-Tuning Your Own Model Is the Best Way to Get the Output You Want with Harper CarrollJoin AI Codecon: Will Open Source Win AI?Fugu: One Model to Orchestrate Them All with Matt PalmerSilicon Valley Is Spooked by Its Own Technology with Aaron LevieCognitive Debt and Long Feedback Loops with Nathen HarveyYour Job is No Longer Writing Prompts. It’s Writing Loops. with YK SugiMultimodal Lakehouse: Evolving Data & Workloads with Chang She
OReilly |

GitHub vs. Cursor: Who Owns the Future of AI Coding?

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER