Uploaded July 2026 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Mark Geragos says prosecutors are presenting far more evidence than necessary at the preliminary hearing—and he believes there’s a strategic reason why. Instead of simply establishing probable cause, Geragos argues the prosecution is spending days emphasizing gruesome details before reaching the medical examiner, whose conclusions he says are filled with words like “may,” “could have,” and “possible.” He predicts the defense’s forensic expert will challenge those conclusions at trial.
Check out '2 Angry Men' with Mark Geragos & Harvey Levin at
youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8t1LSypfILbhhLGg9ne4JWe5xsmz02hL
Connect with us everywhere:
LAMag.com
FB.com/LosAngelesmag
twitter.com/LAmag
Instagram.com/LAMag
TikTok.com/@lamag
Mark Geragos says prosecutors are presenting far more evidence than necessary at the preliminary hearing—and he believes there’s a strategic reason why. Instead of simply establishing probable cause, Geragos argues the prosecution is spending days emphasizing gruesome details before reaching the medical examiner, whose conclusions he says are filled with words like “may,” “could have,” and “possible.” He predicts the defense’s forensic expert will challenge those conclusions at trial.
Check out '2 Angry Men' with Mark Geragos & Harvey Levin at
youtube.com/playlist?list=PL8t1LSypfILbhhLGg9ne4JWe5xsmz02hL
Connect with us everywhere:
LAMag.com
FB.com/LosAngelesmag
twitter.com/LAmag
Instagram.com/LAMag
TikTok.com/@lamag










