Uploaded November 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Validating numerical CFD models against physical laboratory data is essential for building confidence in simulation results and demonstrating their reliability for engineering design. This video summarizes a case study where FLOW-3D HYDRO models of the Garrison Dam Spillway and Outlet Works were validated against experimental data from the US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District (Technical Memorandum 2-431). The comparison shows strong agreement between numerical and physical model results for discharge, water surface elevation, and pressure in both gated and ungated conditions. CFD modeling validated against physical data can provide engineers with a cost-effective tool for evaluating multiple design scenarios and operational conditions. Learn more at flow3d.com/hydro
Validating numerical CFD models against physical laboratory data is essential for building confidence in simulation results and demonstrating their reliability for engineering design. This video summarizes a case study where FLOW-3D HYDRO models of the Garrison Dam Spillway and Outlet Works were validated against experimental data from the US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District (Technical Memorandum 2-431). The comparison shows strong agreement between numerical and physical model results for discharge, water surface elevation, and pressure in both gated and ungated conditions. CFD modeling validated against physical data can provide engineers with a cost-effective tool for evaluating multiple design scenarios and operational conditions. Learn more at flow3d.com/hydro
