Free Speech and Marriage - interview with Dr James Orr (Cambridge) and Dr Tony Rucinski @CoalitionForMarriage
Free Speech and Marriage - interview with Dr James Orr (Cambridge) and Dr Tony Rucinski  @CoalitionForMarriage
Uploaded April 2023 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Dear marriage supporter,

Dr James Orr, an Associate Professor of Philosophy of Religion at Cambridge University and a renowned commentator on social policy and political philosophy, joined us for an enlightening discussion on protecting rights and laws around free speech. You can listen to our discussion here.

In 2016, Dr Orr advocated for a Bill of Rights to protect freedom of speech in the UK, ensuring supporters of beliefs like marriage between a man and woman could express their views without being subjected to a judge’s opinion. However, he now advises caution in pursuing such legislation.

He explains that “structural weaknesses” in rights-based legislation can result in a “ranking exercise” where courts must determine if one person’s right to express their belief in real marriage outweighs another’s right not to be offended.

Reflecting on the proposed ban on so-called conversion therapy, Dr Orr warns that the notion of ‘harm’ can be “weaponised” when the word is understood in psychological rather than physical terms.

He also discusses how the cultural shift towards ‘microaggressions’ “removes one of the central pillars of what counts as a crime under English law … guilty intent”. This is also seen with non-crime hate incidents which require no demonstration of a potentially criminal occurrence.

Dr Orr warns that this trend leads to “a suspension of the principles of natural justice,” and objective evidence becoming less important.

According to Dr Orr, the law that recognises same-sex marriage has “very important downstream ramifications”. To address these concerns, Dr Orr suggests emphasising the public good resulting from real marriage.

He objects to policies that incentivise mothers to place their children in care early, describing it as “nothing short of a scandal”. Instead, he proposes promoting stable marriages by making personal tax allowances fully transferable between spouses.

At C4M, we fully support the right to discuss the benefits of real marriage for adults, children, and society as a whole. We also believe that the Government should utilise every tool at its disposal to promote and encourage the most beneficial foundation for future generations - real marriage.

If you would like to support us financially, you can do so using the donate button on our website at c4m.org.uk

Dr Tony Rucinski

facebook.com/coalition4marriage
Free Speech and Marriage - interview with Dr James Orr (Cambridge) and Dr Tony RucinskiWe can, we must, reclaim marriage - Katy Faust interview with Tony RucinskiThe Fortress of Truth 2025 look back compilation for C4M 1 of 2Bob Wont Back Down on Marriage Down Under - Bob McCoskrie interview with Tony RucinskiTackling Big Techs Raid on Real Marriage Jason Thacker interview with Tony RucinskiONS Now Counts Fathers but the State Discounts Them - Dr Jennifer Roback Morse and Dr Tony RucinskiPro-marriage teacher called safeguarding risk - Ben Dybowski interview with Tony RucinskiRedefining marriage in Australia led to social breakdown - Michelle Pearse / Tony Rucinski interviewSharon James and Tony Rucinski discuss The Case Against the Sexual Revolution by Louise PerryRevd Dr Ian Paul interview with Dr Tony RucinskiPro-marrige Lizzie Harewood uses Subject Access Request when cancelled- interview with Tony RucinskiEmployment Rights for Marriage Supporters - Roger Kiska and Tony Rucinski
CoalitionForMarriage |

Free Speech and Marriage - interview with Dr James Orr (Cambridge) and Dr Tony Rucinski

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER