Uploaded November 2015 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
- Composer: Francis Jean Marcel Poulenc (7 January 1899 -- 30 January 1963)
- Orchestra: Orchestre de la Société des Concerts du Conservatoire
- Conductor: Pierre Dervaux
- Soloists: Francis Poulenc (piano), Jacques Février (piano)
- Year of recording: 1957
Concerto for Two Pianos and Orchestra in D minor, FP 61, written in 1932.
00:00 - I. Allegro ma non troppo
07:47 - II. Larghetto
13:14 - III. Allegro molto
This concerto was commissioned by and dedicated to the Princess Edmond de Polignac and composed over the period of three months in the summer of 1932. The premiere was given on 5 September 1932, at the International Society for Contemporary Music in Venice. Poulenc and his childhood friend Jacques Février were concerto soloists with the La Scala Orchestra, with Désiré Defauw (later conductor of the Chicago Symphony) conducting. Poulenc was gratified by the warm acclaim his work received, and later performed the concerto with Benjamin Britten in England in 1945. The Concerto for Two Pianos is often described as the last work of Poulenc's early period. The composer himself wrote to the Belgian musicologist Paul Collaer: "You will see for yourself what an enormous step forward it is from my previous work and that I am really entering my great period."
The concerto's recurring moto perpetuo, modally inflected figurations are clearly inspired by Poulenc's encounter with a Balinese gamelan at the 1931 Exposition Coloniale de Paris, like so many other works of composers at the time were. Additionally, the work's instrumentation and "jazzy" effects are reminiscent of Ravel's G major Concerto, which was premiered at Paris in January 1932. Inevitably, comparisons have been drawn with Mozart's Concerto in E-flat for two pianos, K. 365, but the slow movement Larghetto's graceful, classically simple melody and gentle, regular accompaniment have reminded some writers of the slow movement of Mozart's C major Piano Concerto, K. 467. Poulenc wrote in a letter to Igor Markevitch, "Would you like to know what I had on my piano during the two months gestation of the Concerto? The concertos of Mozart, those of Liszt, that of Ravel, and your Partita".
- Composer: Francis Jean Marcel Poulenc (7 January 1899 -- 30 January 1963)
- Orchestra: Orchestre de la Société des Concerts du Conservatoire
- Conductor: Pierre Dervaux
- Soloists: Francis Poulenc (piano), Jacques Février (piano)
- Year of recording: 1957
Concerto for Two Pianos and Orchestra in D minor, FP 61, written in 1932.
00:00 - I. Allegro ma non troppo
07:47 - II. Larghetto
13:14 - III. Allegro molto
This concerto was commissioned by and dedicated to the Princess Edmond de Polignac and composed over the period of three months in the summer of 1932. The premiere was given on 5 September 1932, at the International Society for Contemporary Music in Venice. Poulenc and his childhood friend Jacques Février were concerto soloists with the La Scala Orchestra, with Désiré Defauw (later conductor of the Chicago Symphony) conducting. Poulenc was gratified by the warm acclaim his work received, and later performed the concerto with Benjamin Britten in England in 1945. The Concerto for Two Pianos is often described as the last work of Poulenc's early period. The composer himself wrote to the Belgian musicologist Paul Collaer: "You will see for yourself what an enormous step forward it is from my previous work and that I am really entering my great period."
The concerto's recurring moto perpetuo, modally inflected figurations are clearly inspired by Poulenc's encounter with a Balinese gamelan at the 1931 Exposition Coloniale de Paris, like so many other works of composers at the time were. Additionally, the work's instrumentation and "jazzy" effects are reminiscent of Ravel's G major Concerto, which was premiered at Paris in January 1932. Inevitably, comparisons have been drawn with Mozart's Concerto in E-flat for two pianos, K. 365, but the slow movement Larghetto's graceful, classically simple melody and gentle, regular accompaniment have reminded some writers of the slow movement of Mozart's C major Piano Concerto, K. 467. Poulenc wrote in a letter to Igor Markevitch, "Would you like to know what I had on my piano during the two months gestation of the Concerto? The concertos of Mozart, those of Liszt, that of Ravel, and your Partita".




![Ludwig van Beethoven - Grosse Fuge, Op. 133
- Composer: Ludwig van Beethoven (17 December 1770 26 March 1827)
- Performers: Talich Quartet
- Year of recording: 1977
Fugue for string quartet in B flat major (Grosse Fuge), Op. 133, written in 1825.
Beethovens Grosse Fuge {Great Fugue} was originally to have served as the finale to the String Quartet No. 13 in B flat major, Op. 130 [uploaded on this channel]; in fact, that work was first performed with this monumental creation as its sixth and concluding movement. However, the Grosse Fuge, a complete entity in its own right, proved too difficult for the performers and for some members of the audience. Moreover, it seemed an outsized finale for the relatively modest quartet. Beethoven subsequently produced a new final movement for the quartet, an attractive Rondo more in keeping with the spirit of the entire work.
The Grosse Fuge, eventually published as an independent work, is one of Beethovens crowning achievements in the medium of chamber music. The work opens with an introduction, or overtura. Here the mood is dramatic, effectively setting the stage for the whole work. The main theme heroic and defiant, powerful and self-confident is presented in four different versions. First, it is played fortissimo, in an emphatic, assertive manner, which will reemerge as its definitive guise in the coda. The subsequent accounts of the theme gradually become calmer and quieter.
The first fugal section is a double fugue marked Allegro. Here the main theme competes against another subject, which is also fiery and assertive. Their struggle, which includes substantial development, continues fortissimo. The second section, marked Meno mosso e moderato, is also a double fugue, its lyricism providing effective contrast to its predecessor. Here a new theme emerges from the counterpoint of the main melody. The third section, marked Allegro molto e con brio, features further struggle in which the theme eventually falters and seems to disintegrate. The second subject from the first fugal section emerges and appears to take control. Eventually, the main theme is rejuvenated in a passage marked Meno mosso moderato, and the signs of struggle fade in the two Allegro subsections that follow. The coda features the main theme in its original version, but now expanded and clearly triumphant. The mood turns reflective and mysterious, and suddenly the second subject appears, supported by the main theme. The work ends powerfully and magnificently.
The Grosse Fuge is dedicated: Dem Cardinal Erzherzog Rudolph gewidmet. Ludwig van Beethoven - Grosse Fuge, Op. 133](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XAgdd2VqLVc/mqdefault.jpg)
![Vincent dIndy - String Quartet No. 3 in D flat Major
- Composer: Paul Marie Théodore Vincent dIndy (27 March 1851 2 December 1931)
- Performers: Quatuor Joachim
- Year of recording: 2001
String Quartet No. 3 in D flat major, Op. 96, written in 1928-1929.
00:00 - I. Entrée en Sonate (Lentement)
09:59 - II. Intermède (Assez joyeux)
14:34 - III. Thême varié (Assez lent)
24:32 - IV. Finale en rondeau (Lentement)
More than 30 years separate dIndys 2nd String Quartet from 1897 [uploaded on this channel] from his 3rd, composed over 1928-1929 as he passed his 78th birthday. Between the Violin Sonata (1903-1904) and the Piano Quintet (1924), apart from a few small pieces and arrangements, dIndy composed no chamber music, being preoccupied with administrative duties at his music school, the Schola Cantorum funded with his fortune and for which he wrote the course and composition of his musical testament, La Légende de Saint Christophe (1908-1915), into which he crammed his medievalism, his Catholicism, his enormous erudition, his bigotry and anti-Semitism, and his loathing for the rising tide of Modernism.
The preceding quartets, challenged by the prestige the form commanded owing to Beethovens spate of masterpieces, evinced a preoccupation with form, compensating for a habitual absence of melodic afflatus (especially the 2nd), constricting the unusual lyricism of the First and generating a curious aridity in the monothematic Second. With the death of his wife in 1905, dIndys already highly organized approach to composition took on a systematic rigidity and chef décole self-consciousness as his general outlook soured. The attendant heaviness began to dissipate only toward the end of the Great War when a chance encounter with a sympathetic young woman, Caroline Janson, took a romantic turn leading to marriage in 1920 and that amazing series of late masterpieces attesting a puissant rejuvenation the scintillant Poème des ravages, its companion Diptyque méditerranéen for orchestra, and a half-dozen chamber works rife with joy, the Third Quartet among them. It is not that dIndy has become a fetching melodist in his old age his themes are serviceable rather than memorable but supreme technique is animated by potent feeling, the return of his considerable charm, and a generally relaxed geniality. It was no longer necessary for every new work to be an audacious coup de maître, though the Third Quartet qualifies.
From the opening bars there is lift, cordiality ecstasy, even managed by a master hand. The welcoming mien is confirmed by a two-page notice explicative prefacing the score [included at the beginning of the video] in which the works formal design is spelled out after a brief introduction a compact sonata first movement, passionate yet smiling; a candid Intermède set off by a trio of ravishing tendresse; a slender theme becoming ever more persuasive through seven brief but elaborate variations; and a rondo finale with five refrains leading through nostalgia-laced joy to a triumphant peroration.
The Quatuor Calvet gave the premiere at a Société Nationale concert on 12 April 1930; the quartet is also dedicated to them: au Quatuor CALVET: Joseph Calvet, Daniel Guilevitch, Léon Pascal et Paul Mas. Vincent dIndy - String Quartet No. 3 in D flat Major](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XNYnWPwEAnE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Maurice Duruflé - Requiem, Op. 9
- Composer: Maurice Duruflé (11 January 1902 16 June 1986)
- Orchestra: Orchestre de la Cité
- Choir: Michel Piquemal Vocal Ensemble
- Conductor: Michel Piquemal
- Soloists: Didier Henry (tenor), Béatrice Uria-Monzon (mezzo soprano), Eric Lebrun (organ), François Poly (cello), Marc Vieillefon (violin)
- Year of recording: 1994
Requiem, for orchestra, organ & chorus / for organ & chorus / for small ensemble, organ & chorus, Op. 9 (3 versions), written in 1947.
00:00 - I. Introit
03:25 - II. Kyrie
06:47 - III. Domine Jesu Christe
14:58 - IV. Sanctus
18:08 - V. Pie Jesu
22:03 - VI. Agnus Dei
26:02 - VII. Lux Aeterna
29:38 - VIII. Libera Me
35:23 - IX. In Paradisum
In 1947, Maurice Duruflé was already working on a suite of pieces for organ based on the Gregorian chants for the requiem mass (the service for the dead), when he was commissioned by his publisher Durand to write a large-scale work based on those texts. The resulting Requiem, originally for orchestra and chorus, is the culmination of Duruflés style, mixing chant, quasi-Renaissance counterpoint, and sumptuous harmony derived from Fauré, Debussy, and Ravel.
Duruflé made three versions of this work; the final one, completed in 1961, is for choir, string orchestra, trumpets, and organ; it is the most practical and the most commonly used (also in this recording). He used the same text as Fauré had done in his Requiem of 1889, omitting the Dies Irae [Day of Wrath] section which, although it provided some of the most spectacular music in the Mozart, Berlioz, and Verdi settings, was not compatible with the gentler, more reassuring tone of the work. This peaceful quality is in many ways simply a reflection of the Requiems indebtedness to Gregorian chant, the flowing, easy quality of which serves as a musical template for many of the movements (chant formed a large part of Duruflés musical upbringing: from 1912 to 1918 he was a boy chorister at the cathedral in Rouen, where the services were almost entirely chanted, and his professional education was at the Paris Conservatoire, where harmonizing chant melodies was a large part of the training for organists). Duruflé presents the chants quite clearly, much as in his Four Motets on Gregorian themes. The serene mood is enhanced by pervasive imitative counterpoint in a quasi-Renaissance melodic style. There is often a similarity of sound between Duruflés music and that of Vaughan Williams, who briefly studied in France and also used modal melodies and counterpoint, though for him these archaic-sounding techniques were inspired by English folk music and the composers of the Tudor era. With Duruflé, the modal counterpoint is supported by rich, and very French, added-note harmonies.
Duruflés grounding in the past is evident throughout the Requiem. The opening movement, one of the most beautiful in twentieth century music, sets a mood for the rest of the piece: running sixteenths (a favorite device of Duruflés) create a wash of sound, preparing the entrance of the tenors and basses intoning the requiem chant, soon accompanied by a wordless vocalise from the womens voices. The original chant melodies are present in many of the movements; a striking instance is the Kyrie, where the trumpets sound the chant melody in long notes over a busy contrapuntal texture in the choir (which in turn is based on a rhythmicized version of the chant). The effect is similar to that of Bachs famous cantus firmus cantata opening movements Wachet Auf and Ein feste Burg are good examples. Another striking section is the Pie Jesu, which Duruflé sets in a style very similar to Fauré, with a mezzo-soprano solo accompanied only by organ and cello; unfortunately the soloist in this recording sounds a bit bloated. In the final movement, In Paradisum, the sopranos, supported by full chords in the strings, sing the incantatory chant promising the deceased a peaceful welcome into heaven. At the words chorus angelorum te suscipiat [May the choir of angels receive you], the other singers enter with a beautiful, slowly descending passage to end the work. Duruflés wife has said that while composing his Requiem, which is dedicated to the memory of his father, Duruflé cried several times; it is indeed one of the most moving religious works of the twentieth century. Maurice Duruflé - Requiem, Op. 9](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/XRzPi0CA1rg/mqdefault.jpg)



