Uploaded April 2014 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
Chautauqua County Legislature heard from five speakers on high-volume hydraulic horizontal fracking. Mike Hogan maintains that the NY DEC learned from the mistakes of Pennsylvania and elsewhere, that the new giant rigs walk themselves to the next drill site, are self-contained in a closed-loop system, that the high-tech operation can be run remotely, and that the gas and oil industry improves rural road so as to get their thousands of trucks of water and cement and steel pipe and chemicals and machinery to the frack pads. Hogan notes that the mean wage in the industry is about $84 k per year. The last speaker in the series was attorney Mary Hajdu, representing a landowners group, who says that the changes horizontal fracking makes in a community is, "... sort of like a Walmart coming to your town, without all the petty larceny." Hajdu says that if the New York moratorium is lifted, NY's "compulsory integration" will require only 60% of the owners in a HVHF 'spacing unit' for the frack process to go forward. And only those landowners who have signed up with with a landowners group stand a chance to be properly represented. Both Hogan and Hajdu speak of high-tech "draining" of the methane (etc) from the Utica plays.
Chautauqua County Legislature heard from five speakers on high-volume hydraulic horizontal fracking. Mike Hogan maintains that the NY DEC learned from the mistakes of Pennsylvania and elsewhere, that the new giant rigs walk themselves to the next drill site, are self-contained in a closed-loop system, that the high-tech operation can be run remotely, and that the gas and oil industry improves rural road so as to get their thousands of trucks of water and cement and steel pipe and chemicals and machinery to the frack pads. Hogan notes that the mean wage in the industry is about $84 k per year. The last speaker in the series was attorney Mary Hajdu, representing a landowners group, who says that the changes horizontal fracking makes in a community is, "... sort of like a Walmart coming to your town, without all the petty larceny." Hajdu says that if the New York moratorium is lifted, NY's "compulsory integration" will require only 60% of the owners in a HVHF 'spacing unit' for the frack process to go forward. And only those landowners who have signed up with with a landowners group stand a chance to be properly represented. Both Hogan and Hajdu speak of high-tech "draining" of the methane (etc) from the Utica plays.








![Unabomber: Not paranoid, but conspired against.
An interview with David Kaczinski we did in 2005. David, Teds brother, learned only during Teds trial that his brother was an MKUltra victim at Harvard.
May 26, 1996
Text of Unabomber Manifesto
[This text was sent last June to The New York Times and The Washington Post by the person who calls himself FC, identified by the FBI as the Unabomber, whom authorities have implicated in three murders and 16 bombings. The author threatened to send a bomb to an unspecified destination with intent to kill unless one of the newspapers published this manuscript. The Attorney General and the Director of the FBI recommended publication.]
INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY AND ITS FUTURE
Introduction
1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in advanced countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in advanced countries.
2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but only after passing through a long and very painful period of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine. Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of dignity and autonomy.
3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is to break down it had best break down sooner rather than later.
4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively gradual process spanning a few decades. We cant predict any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the measures that those who hate the industrial system should take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments but the economic and technological basis of the present society. (see yoryevrah comment for continuation of Kaczinskis manifesto). Unabomber: Not paranoid, but conspired against.](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/foto7touE0o/mqdefault.jpg)

