Flat Earth: Super Speed 4 Hour Time Lapse! (say "when" it's a globe!) @heathcarmody2867

Heath Carmody | Flat Earth: Super Speed 4 Hour Time Lapse! (say "when" it's a globe!) @heathcarmody2867 | Uploaded August 2020 | Updated October 2024, 12 hours ago.
This is a long inferior mirage transition that didn't really 'break' until the last hour of recording. This is just a teaser for the 3 (+1) camera synced time lapse I'm working on. Is that an inferior mirage above eye level near the end? Hmmm.. What else is interesting about this observation?

$Two Camera Heights - Supplemental Footage From Observation #13 Shelter Bay Ferry (May 30th, 2021). I decided to keep this time lapse separate because it was in between heights, and a 3-way never works out as good as it sounds. This is about 2.5 hours of footage sped up very fast. This camera is my old, damaged Panasonic V180K which still takes decent but very washed out video. There is some end of observation footage from the 2 meter camera in this video, and some that I saved for the final. My next video will further explain the point of all this and why I chose this particular observation. Im providing some footage with clear, reasonably measurable obstruction (at times) cause by either physical blockage by water, or by refraction - specifically upward refraction, or by some other unknown effect. So I would like to see some comments from globe proponents about where the physical horizon would be if we could see it, and things to that effect. If there is not enough information to make any claims about obstruction from Earth curve, then let me know how I can improve my observations in order to show evidence for a globe - besides getting much higher and looking much farther. Plenty of people are doing and have done that! Details: Camera height: 4 - 5 meters Second camera height (end footage): 2 - 2.5 meters. Target distance: 18.5 km Time of recording: About 1 pm to 4 pm Conditions: Sunny, very warm afternoon. Slight breeze picked up and clouds rolled in towards the end of the observation. About the lines: Vertical blue lines represent an angle of about 0.037 degrees or about 12 meters at that distance. Use this as a scale reference. Yellow line is a rough estimate of my camera level and a reference for mirage movement.$ $Flat? Sure, but is it level? A quick look at a small paver patio with my cell phone camera, able to get low and level with the surface. Using only this short observation, can you determine the true shape of this flat surface? What about refraction?$ $Another 21 Minutes (Of not Superior Mirage) A detailed real time look at an interesting part of a 6 hour observation (12km point #7). This video asks more questions than it answers, but it is just another starting point for a greater discussion about superior/inferior mirages and refraction in general. From this point I will go forward or backward in the observation depending on what I feel the need to show to illustrate the no superior mirage reasoning. This is footage from the same time frame as the hour long raw footage I released earlier here: https://youtu.be/QuMnnwtMods This is mostly from the close camera and ends where the close camera footage begins in the 1 hour video. The beginning of the 1 hour video is from the far camera. Hopefully that makes sense? I wanted to release more footage leading up to the strange mirage event that Travis took an in depth look at here: https://youtu.be/QJJDx74RxKE There are a lot of subtitles in the first half, but the second half is raw footage ready for others analysis.$

In-Ferry-Or Mirage Day 8 - Finally a Full Transition!

$Fast Slow Refraction$

$Concave Creeper (Observation #7 Refraction Effect Highlight)$

Distance Offset Optical Test #3 - All Ferry Passes

$Same Lake, Different Day - Super Fast Long Low Black Swan Time Lapse (SFLLBSTL) From observation #5, April 2nd 2020. No expectations of good visibility on this day as I planned to just tweak my camera time lapse setup, on what I thought would be an endless strong inferior mirage day. There is nothing wrong with my camera (besides being the worst of my cameras for picture quality and audio) it was in focus and not even fully zoomed. Thats just how it looks sometimes. 100% refraction. Even though black swan observations are incredibly common for me on this lake, this one was a bit unexpected due to the air temperature being much cooler than the water, (6-8°C air, 8-9°C water) and no reason (that I can see) for a strong temperature inversion over the lake. I recorded extreme concave/compressed appearance for the entire 4 hours from 3 camera heights. Whats most puzzling to me is how these sequences never even get close to anything that could be considered obstruction by a water horizon. Foreground and background seem to move in unison much of the time, despite a 7 km difference in distance. Interesting too, how strong the distortion from refraction is - on such a day with no direct sun and plenty of wind to mix the air layers. More on this observation coming soon.$ $Retro Time Lapse in 4K - 4 hours in 1 song Tired of seeing the same old blues.. This was from observation #9 (yes, 9 already) at Shelter Bay ferry. Back to my spot from the first few observations this year, where the only real points of interest are the far ferry dock and Ann point at 18.5 km (featured). This was one of my longest continuous time lapses (over 4 hours) from a high elevation, with the good 4k camera. Camera was at least 12 meters above the lake level, possibly up to 16 meters. Either way, not much would be obstructed at 18.5 km, and nothing really is - besides the beginning when inferior mirage was still strong. The lower camera footage will be more useful for analysis. Not really impressed with the views from higher up. I really do think I can see better from right near the water. Wavy full frame distortion is always much stronger on land, no matter the height. Ill expand on this in an upcoming video. Also notice the camera movement. No wind - maybe a light breeze later on but nothing considerable. Camera was 100% untouched besides changing the battery once. Camera movements dont make sense for wind. 4 hours of recording in 2 minutes shouldnt show any gradual camera movements, especially that slowly rebound. Background and target are both far enough away that they could be close to evenly displaced by refraction. Tripod was secure and camera only at about half zoom. No image stabilizer used on camera. I tried to stabilize it in the editor but there wasnt enough contrast on the far hill, so it wouldnt work right. Oh well, it is what it is.$