Mick West | Explained: "Go Fast" UFO Video - Not Low and Not Fast - Like a Balloon! @MickWest | Uploaded June 2019 | Updated October 2024, 9 hours ago.
The "Go Fast" UFO looks like it's going really fast, but a simple analysis of the data available in the video shows that it is not.
So, the History Channel's "Unidentified" show was wrong and "To the Stars Academy" was wrong. Not only that, but they are either the worst 3D analysts in the world, or they knew it was wrong a year ago and just kept going with it because it's more interesting that way.
Metabunk "Go Fast" analysis thread: metabunk.org/go-fast-footage-from-tom-delonges-to-the-stars-academy-balloon.t9569
"Not So Fast" video, explaining the parallax illusion in depth. youtube.com/watch?v=YYqVa59VRRc
3D recreation with a NON-MOVING object, demonstrating the extent of parallax. youtube.com/watch?v=j1O4iBke2vo
Nimitz/FLIR analysis: metabunk.org/2004-uss-nimitz-tic-tac-ufo-flir-footage-flir1.t9190
Gimbal analysis: metabunk.org/nyt-gimbal-video-of-u-s-navy-jet-encounter-with-unknown-object.t9333
The "Go Fast" UFO looks like it's going really fast, but a simple analysis of the data available in the video shows that it is not.
So, the History Channel's "Unidentified" show was wrong and "To the Stars Academy" was wrong. Not only that, but they are either the worst 3D analysts in the world, or they knew it was wrong a year ago and just kept going with it because it's more interesting that way.
Metabunk "Go Fast" analysis thread: metabunk.org/go-fast-footage-from-tom-delonges-to-the-stars-academy-balloon.t9569
"Not So Fast" video, explaining the parallax illusion in depth. youtube.com/watch?v=YYqVa59VRRc
3D recreation with a NON-MOVING object, demonstrating the extent of parallax. youtube.com/watch?v=j1O4iBke2vo
Nimitz/FLIR analysis: metabunk.org/2004-uss-nimitz-tic-tac-ufo-flir-footage-flir1.t9190
Gimbal analysis: metabunk.org/nyt-gimbal-video-of-u-s-navy-jet-encounter-with-unknown-object.t9333