Editorial fatigue, Probably Not 3 @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Editorial fatigue, Probably Not 3  @LydiaMcGrewChannel
Uploaded May 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Mark Goodacre says that Luke invented a new Parable of the Minas (Luke 19:11-27), trying to make it different from the Parable of the Talents told in Matthew 25:14-30. But, says Goodacre, Luke made up a clunky parable (that Jesus never really told) due to "editorial fatigue," and we can find the signs of this in the parables themselves.

Here I discuss the question of whether a 10 vs. 1 pattern is really especially typical of Luke, something Goodacre claims is a giveaway of Luke's invention. Where would mainstream NT scholars be without cherry picking and illusory "patterns"?

Goodacre's influential article is available here free:

markgoodacre.org/Q/fatigue.htm

I also refer to this monograph:

archive.org/details/gouldergospelsex0000good

And this book:

amazon.com/Synoptic-Problem-through-Understanding-Bible/dp/0567080560
Editorial fatigue, Probably Not 3Bayes, Skeptics, and the Resurrection 9The Paradox of Improbable EvidenceMatthean Discourses 4: Jesus teaching the same thing twice in one gospel!Editorial fatigue, Probably Not 2Discrepancy Hunting in Non-Biblical Literature: Couldnt Sallust just have made a mistake?Development Theories of the Gospels are All Bunk 2: More on the PassionThe Strange Minimalist Use of Liberal Scholar Norman PerrinIf youre an evidentialist, whats the point of church?Running back to the Prior 3: Arif Ahmed resuscitates the swoon theoryAuthorship of John, Part 9: Could the son of Zebedee have witnessed the Passion?Authorship of John, Part 11: Who was at the Last Supper?
Lydia McGrew |

Editorial fatigue, Probably Not 3

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER