Uploaded April 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Here I discuss Mark Goodacre's claim that the feeding of the five thousand in Luke shows signs of "editorial fatigue." According to Goodacre, Luke factually changes the location of the feeding to a city and then just two verses later slips back into including elements of the story that are incompatible with this made-up setting. So he "ruins the story."
I bring a little rigorous common sense to bear to show how unjustified this theory is.
Here is Goodacre's article:
markgoodacre.org/fatigue.pdf
Thumbnail courtesy of FreeBibleImages.org
Here I discuss Mark Goodacre's claim that the feeding of the five thousand in Luke shows signs of "editorial fatigue." According to Goodacre, Luke factually changes the location of the feeding to a city and then just two verses later slips back into including elements of the story that are incompatible with this made-up setting. So he "ruins the story."
I bring a little rigorous common sense to bear to show how unjustified this theory is.
Here is Goodacre's article:
markgoodacre.org/fatigue.pdf
Thumbnail courtesy of FreeBibleImages.org










