Uploaded May 2011 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
1. Craig does not give a definition for what he is giving evidence for.
2. Part of his opening speech needs a translation... into proper English.
3. Contradictory statements:
1) a/ the number of past events can't be infinite - b/ the number of 'abstract objects' is infinite. So, is it possible for any number of things to be infinite? Which is it?
2) Uses two conflicting trends in philosophy: a/ objects exist - b/ everything is in the process of becoming. Existence or Becoming. Which is it?
3) a/ accepts the theory of the Big Bang, in its basis is Einstein"s Theory of Relativity - b/ does not accept Einstein's Theory of Relativity, because it renders absolute time and simultaneity meaningless, hence no god. Which is it?
Craig's opening speech in the debate with the phisicist Laurence Krauss "What is the Evidence for God?":
youtube.com/watch?v=0K6-M_ZwaXk
youtube.com/watch?v=DOwLG0GSIh8&feature=related
"God and Time", a lecture by Craig:
youtube.com/watch?v=PeosUsckIk0
Craig doesn't give a definition for god, when asked:
reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8779
Heraclitus's philosophy of becoming:
suite101.com/content/ancient-greek-philosophy-and-heraclitus-a98753
Positivism:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positivism
britannica.com/facts/5/561019/Ernst-Mach-as-discussed-in-Positivism-philosophy
1. Craig does not give a definition for what he is giving evidence for.
2. Part of his opening speech needs a translation... into proper English.
3. Contradictory statements:
1) a/ the number of past events can't be infinite - b/ the number of 'abstract objects' is infinite. So, is it possible for any number of things to be infinite? Which is it?
2) Uses two conflicting trends in philosophy: a/ objects exist - b/ everything is in the process of becoming. Existence or Becoming. Which is it?
3) a/ accepts the theory of the Big Bang, in its basis is Einstein"s Theory of Relativity - b/ does not accept Einstein's Theory of Relativity, because it renders absolute time and simultaneity meaningless, hence no god. Which is it?
Craig's opening speech in the debate with the phisicist Laurence Krauss "What is the Evidence for God?":
youtube.com/watch?v=0K6-M_ZwaXk
youtube.com/watch?v=DOwLG0GSIh8&feature=related
"God and Time", a lecture by Craig:
youtube.com/watch?v=PeosUsckIk0
Craig doesn't give a definition for god, when asked:
reasonablefaith.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=8779
Heraclitus's philosophy of becoming:
suite101.com/content/ancient-greek-philosophy-and-heraclitus-a98753
Positivism:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positivism
britannica.com/facts/5/561019/Ernst-Mach-as-discussed-in-Positivism-philosophy
