Digital Simulations of Minds Will Not Be Conscious: from mere causality to real qualia contact @/Andr%C3%A9sG%C3%B3mezEmilsson

Andrés Gómez Emilsson | Digital Simulations of Minds Will Not Be Conscious: from mere causality to real qualia contact @/Andr%C3%A9sG%C3%B3mezEmilsson | Uploaded March 2023 | Updated October 2024, 16 hours ago.

Equanimity as a Tool to Increase the Stress Dissipation Capacity of the Nervous System

Harmonic Society: 8 Models of Art for a Scientific Paradigm of Aesthetic Qualia

Attention & Awareness: Oscillatory Complementarity, Non-Linearities, and the Pointlessness of It All

Energy Management: Discussion on Advanced Techniques for Neural Annealing w/ Libor, Beata, & Andrés

The Qualia Review - Episode 3: Tactile Textures

Buddhist Annealing: Wireheading Done Right with the Seven Factors of Awakening

$Quantifying Bliss: Empirically Testable Hypotheses For Valence Talk by Andrés Gómez Emilsson from the Qualia Research Institute. Venue: 2018 Science of Consciousness conference, Tucson, AZ. Abstract: What makes an experience blissful? Can bliss ever be quantified? Emotion is usually factored along two main axes: arousal (energy level) and valence (the pleasure-pain axis). High valence (i.e. highly blissful) states of consciousness include: orgasm, romantic love, deep sleep, concentration meditation (so-called “Jhana states”), psychedelic ecstasy, and so on. Low valence states include: depression, anxiety, bodily discomfort, and the experiential quality of listening to dissonance. Confusingly, we also experience neutral as well as mixed states of consciousness. An explanatory framework that ties together these disparate experiences in a coherent way is needed, such that valence becomes objectively quantifiable. Affective neuroscience classically addresses the question of “what makes an experience blissful” in terms of things such as neuroanatomical correlates (“pleasure center activation”), neurotransmitter and receptor function (“Mu-opioid activation”), and computational concepts (“reinforcement learning”). It is important to note that positive valence is associated with these features, but that does not, on its own, constitute a satisfying explanation. More so, counterexamples to such associations abound (unpleasant opioidergic states, reinforcement without pleasure, etc.) A scientific account of valence should be able to explain these associations and their exceptions, provide clear quantitative metrics for valence in arbitrary brain states, and, above all, make precise and testable (hopefully surprising) predictions. We advance a framework for studying consciousness that can deliver just that. We introduce the concepts of: Qualia Formalism (for any given conscious experience, there exists a mathematical object isomorphic to its phenomenology), Qualia Structuralism (this mathematical object has a rich set of formal structures), and Valence Realism (valence is a crisp phenomenon of conscious states upon which we can apply a measure). Based on this framework we propose the “Symmetry Theory of Valence” (STV): Given a mathematical object isomorphic to the qualia of a system, the mathematical property which corresponds to how pleasant it is to be that system is that object’s symmetry. We pair up the STV to various accounts of “the structural level at which valence takes place” and generate empirically testable predictions for each. Namely, we generate predictions for: (1) the protein and microtubule account introduced by Hameroff & Penrose (1996), (2) the “mental organs” account of states of consciousness proposed by Ray (2012), and (3) the connectome-specific harmonic account of brain states by Atasoy et al. (2016). In particular for (3), we arrive at an equation that transforms fMRI data into Consonance-Dissonance-Noise Signatures (CDNS) which, according to the STV, ought to account for a large fraction of the variance associated with valence. If experimentally verified, this equation would be the first fully quantitative account of valence derived from first principles capable of tying together the myriad kinds of bliss into a coherent framework.$