@CreationMyths
  @CreationMyths
Creation Myths | DEBATE: Is the Human Genome Largely Junk DNA? with Dr. Casey Luskin @CreationMyths | Uploaded May 2024 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
On May 2nd, 2024 on the Non-Sequitur Show, I debated Discovery Institute's Dr. Casey Luskin on the question "Is the human genome largely junk DNA?"

This is that debate in full. The takeaway is this: Yes, the human genome is mostly (80-90%) junk DNA, that is, DNA that does not have a function.

By the end of this debate, Dr. Luskin had revised his argument somewhat, and if creationists use *that* version of the argument going forward, they'll be a lot less wrong about junk DNA.

This is just a hobby for me, but if you appreciate what I'm doing and want to say thank you, you can contribute here:
patreon.com/creationmyths
paypal.me/creationmyths?locale.x=en_US

And if you want early access to pre-recorded videos, you can become a channel member: youtube.com/channel/UCZmhEtG-QIrmyWoW0M6TIgQ/join

If you disagree with anything in this video and want an opportunity to make your case, email me: creationmythschannel@gmail.com. I'll give you as much time as you want, and then I'll take the time I want to respond, and we can have a conversation.
DEBATE: Is the Human Genome Largely Junk DNA? with Dr. Casey LuskinCreation Myth: Created HeterozygosityDiscovery Institute Accidentally Refutes Intelligent Design40 Failed Predictions? LOL NOPE, with Science FriendsWrong Answers Only #3: The New Answers Book 1, Chapters 3 and 4Creation Myth: Lactase Persistence and Loss of RegulationEvolution and Creationism with A Rational EmpiricistCreation Myth: Irreducible ComplexityCreation Myth: H1N1 and Genetic EntropyCreation Trick: Quote-Mine the AbstractDr. Nathaniel Jeanson Flubs PhylogeneticsBook Review: Replacing Darwin by Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson (Part 1)

DEBATE: Is the Human Genome Largely Junk DNA? with Dr. Casey Luskin @CreationMyths

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER