@CreationMyths
  @CreationMyths
Creation Myths | Discovery Institute Accidentally Refutes Intelligent Design @CreationMyths | Uploaded July 2024 | Updated October 2024, 11 minutes ago.
Discovery Institute keeps going with the junk DNA stuff, and they miss the ball again with their latest. And in doing so, they made an argument that has some unintended implications.

It's a great argument *against* intelligent design creationism.

This is just a hobby for me, but if you appreciate what I'm doing and want to say thank you, you can contribute here:
patreon.com/creationmyths
paypal.me/creationmyths?locale.x=en_US

And if you want early access to pre-recorded videos, you can become a channel member: youtube.com/channel/UCZmhEtG-QIrmyWoW0M6TIgQ/join

If you disagree with anything in this video and want an opportunity to make your case, email me: creationmythschannel@gmail.com. I'll give you as much time as you want, and then I'll take the time I want to respond, and we can have a conversation.
Discovery Institute Accidentally Refutes Intelligent Design40 Failed Predictions? LOL NOPE, with Science FriendsWrong Answers Only #3: The New Answers Book 1, Chapters 3 and 4Creation Myth: Lactase Persistence and Loss of RegulationEvolution and Creationism with A Rational EmpiricistCreation Myth: Irreducible ComplexityCreation Myth: H1N1 and Genetic EntropyCreation Trick: Quote-Mine the AbstractDr. Nathaniel Jeanson Flubs PhylogeneticsBook Review: Replacing Darwin by Dr. Nathaniel Jeanson (Part 1)Creation Myth: Orphan Genes Refute Common AncestryThings Cant Evolve with NephilimFree (Rage Quit)

Discovery Institute Accidentally Refutes Intelligent Design @CreationMyths

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER