A Skeptical Human | David Pakman Debunked: "Male Circumcision Is Beneficial!" @ASkepticalHumanOnYouTube | Uploaded April 2019 | Updated October 2024, 3 hours ago.
Circumcision advocates argue that performing this procedure on children and infants is justified because of its medical, hygienic, and aesthetic benefits. Here, I point out the many problems in all of these different arguments, ultimately concluding that circumcising children without their consent is deeply immoral and unjustified.
Support my videos on Patreon!: patreon.com/askepticalhuman
Merch store!: shopaskepticalhuman.com
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/aSkepticalHuman
Text or audio version of this content is available on my website: askepticalhuman.com/miscellaneous/2019/4/21/debunking-david-pakman-male-circumcision-is-beneficial
Thumbnail photos: Angelo Esslinger (whitesession)/Pixabay; Clker-Free-Vector-Images/Pixabay; joffi/Pixabay;
Circumcision advocates argue that performing this procedure on children and infants is justified because of its medical, hygienic, and aesthetic benefits. Here, I point out the many problems in all of these different arguments, ultimately concluding that circumcising children without their consent is deeply immoral and unjustified.
Support my videos on Patreon!: patreon.com/askepticalhuman
Merch store!: shopaskepticalhuman.com
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/aSkepticalHuman
Text or audio version of this content is available on my website: askepticalhuman.com/miscellaneous/2019/4/21/debunking-david-pakman-male-circumcision-is-beneficial
Thumbnail photos: Angelo Esslinger (whitesession)/Pixabay; Clker-Free-Vector-Images/Pixabay; joffi/Pixabay;