Uploaded November 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 hour ago
In a 2021 speech entitled “The Universities are the Enemy,” Vice President JD Vance declared, “We have to honestly and aggressively attack the universities in this country.” Such attacks are part of the global authoritarian playbook to curtail universities’ independence and capacity to sustain democracy. In the U.S., however, the attack is perversely cloaked in civil rights discourse and tied to the persistent assault on racial justice efforts. As SFFA v. Harvard exemplifies, measures meant to address discrimination against marginalized communities are rebranded as racism against white people. Today this strategy manifests in right-wing campaigns against “critical race theory” and “DEI.”
A redefined notion of antisemitism marks the latest front. Here, conservative white elites and some Jewish communities are encouraged to band together to suppress critical thinking, progressive ideas, and supposedly “woke” faculty and students accused of antisemitism. This weaponization of “antisemitism” serves as a cloak for efforts to dismantle faculty self-governance and academic freedom. Universities are being pressured by donors and trustees as they struggle to balance student protest rights with claims of safety. Faculty governance norms are being upended as personnel are dismissed without due process. These crises collide with economic vulnerability after decades of neoliberal “corporatization.”
This panel draws on Critical Race Theory to examine how to act strategically and collaboratively within an individualist, careerist academic culture during this era of ideological conflict, with the goal of protecting and advancing higher education’s core mission: the pursuit of truth and knowledge for the common good.
•Mario L. Barnes, Chancellor’s Professor of Law, UC Irvine School of Law
•Steven W. Bender, Associate Dean for Planning and Strategic Initiatives and Professor of Law, Seattle University Law School
•Meera E. Deo, Professor of Law, Southwestern Law School
•Athena D. Mutua, Professor of Law and the Floyd H. & Hilda L. Hurst Faculty Scholar, University at Buffalo Law School
In a 2021 speech entitled “The Universities are the Enemy,” Vice President JD Vance declared, “We have to honestly and aggressively attack the universities in this country.” Such attacks are part of the global authoritarian playbook to curtail universities’ independence and capacity to sustain democracy. In the U.S., however, the attack is perversely cloaked in civil rights discourse and tied to the persistent assault on racial justice efforts. As SFFA v. Harvard exemplifies, measures meant to address discrimination against marginalized communities are rebranded as racism against white people. Today this strategy manifests in right-wing campaigns against “critical race theory” and “DEI.”
A redefined notion of antisemitism marks the latest front. Here, conservative white elites and some Jewish communities are encouraged to band together to suppress critical thinking, progressive ideas, and supposedly “woke” faculty and students accused of antisemitism. This weaponization of “antisemitism” serves as a cloak for efforts to dismantle faculty self-governance and academic freedom. Universities are being pressured by donors and trustees as they struggle to balance student protest rights with claims of safety. Faculty governance norms are being upended as personnel are dismissed without due process. These crises collide with economic vulnerability after decades of neoliberal “corporatization.”
This panel draws on Critical Race Theory to examine how to act strategically and collaboratively within an individualist, careerist academic culture during this era of ideological conflict, with the goal of protecting and advancing higher education’s core mission: the pursuit of truth and knowledge for the common good.
•Mario L. Barnes, Chancellor’s Professor of Law, UC Irvine School of Law
•Steven W. Bender, Associate Dean for Planning and Strategic Initiatives and Professor of Law, Seattle University Law School
•Meera E. Deo, Professor of Law, Southwestern Law School
•Athena D. Mutua, Professor of Law and the Floyd H. & Hilda L. Hurst Faculty Scholar, University at Buffalo Law School
![CRS 25th Anniversary Symposium- Moral Panic and Moral Dilemma: CRT & the Reckoning of Our Democracy
While vilified and mischaracterized in the contemporary American imagination, Critical Race Theory (CRT) is the very analytical tool that can help America reckon with its unjust past and chart a racially just future. CRT recognizes that America’s past is not distant from its current reality. In the last text he wrote before his murder, Martin Luther King, Jr. observed that “[n]o society can fully repress an ugly past when the ravages persist into the present.” The Fugitive Slave Act of yesterday echoes in today’s anti-immigrant policies—fueled by racism and xenophobia. Slavery’s denial of education for enslaved (and some free) Black people reappears in the substandard opportunities still reserved for Black children in segregated, under-resourced schools.
CRT teaches that the past is prologue and that cycles of inequality perpetuate unless interrupted. At bottom, tactics of racial oppression—past and present—seek to erase the power, perseverance, and political participation of Black people and other communities of color. CRT not only exposes this agenda but also provides a blueprint for building a more racially just democracy. This is why CRT has long been both a target, as seen in the current moral panic about CRT, DEI, and other equity efforts, and an emancipatory tool.
This panel will bring together legal scholars and policy advocates who use CRT to expose the law’s complicity in racial inequality. Panelists will explore how CRT can help America confront its past and advance justice in democracy, immigration, and education.
•Janel George, Associate Professor of Law and Founding Director, Racial Equity in Education Law & Policy Clinic, Georgetown Law
•Cara McClellan, Founding Director and Practice Associate Professor of the Advocacy for Racial and Civil (ARC) Justice Clinic, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School
•Karla McKanders, Director, Thurgood Marshall Institute, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.
•Jin Hee Lee, Director of Strategic Initiatives, NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. CRS 25th Anniversary Symposium- Moral Panic and Moral Dilemma: CRT & the Reckoning of Our Democracy](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mrrX8EssmXg/mqdefault.jpg)









