Uploaded August 2008 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
UPDATE (09/08/08):
IchtusDeogloria is the next Creationist to be named and shamed. His video will be in production shortly.
UPDATE (04/08/08):
Just like any other Creationist, NF has now shown up here with his insults and his lies, demanding peer reviewed papers on how Recombination allows for increased variation. Well, no doubt he'll deny them until his Bible chokes him, but here are some resources to give everyone else who is interested a start.
Science Daily: Genetic Recombination
sciencedaily.com/articles/g/genetic_recombination.htm
Genetic Recombination Misused: An article refuting creationist misrepresentation of science
evolutionpages.com/Critique%20of%20Ashcraft%20article.htm
(and by the way, the article this is in response to itself, while it is a Creationist article, contradicts NF, because it states that Recombination IS THE ONLY METHOD OF VARIATION; thus contradicting the claim by NF that Recombination prevents changes).
WileyScience Journal: ChemBioChem
www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109741904/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Construction of a 10,000 marker ultra-dense genetic recombination map of Potato: Providing a framework for accelerated gene isolation and a genome-wide physical map
genetics.org/cgi/content/abstract/genetics.106.055871v1
ScienceDirect: Genetic recombination at different points in the Npro-coding region of bovine viral diarrhea viruses and the potentials to change their antigenicities and pathogenicities (this one I KNOW will go over NF's head)
sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T32-4H8MNMB-2&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=5d35d9e2fba9606889ec5b12181ad90c
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY.
I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technolo...
Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/...
Censorship is NOT a valid argument.
This is a video series that reveals Creationists for what they truly are; closed minded and completely incorrect.
Nephilimfree is the Creationist featured in this video. He is the master of the condescending look and his claims are laughable. Each one of his claims is debunked in the following documents:
Talk Origins: Are Mutations Harmful?
talkorigins.org/faqs/mutations.html
Talk Origins: Response to Creationist Claim CB101: "Most Mutations are Harmful" (Henry Morris)
talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB101.html
Gate.Net: Beneficial Mutations
gate.net/~rwms/EvoMutations.html
New Scientist: E.Coli and Citrate+ Ingestion - A new genetic trait
newscientist.com/channel/life/dn14094-bacteria-make-major-evolutionary-shift-in-the-lab.html
Talk Origins: "Plagiarised Errors and Molecular Genetics"
(includes the section on Duane Gish's argument about Pseudogenes and "Backups")
talkorigins.org/faqs/molgen
Not relevant to the video but interesting nonetheless:
Transcripts of the Kitzmiller Vs Dover Trial:
talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover.html
Also available here:
aclupa.org/legal/legaldocket/intelligentdesigncase/dovertrialtranscripts.htm
UPDATE (09/08/08):
IchtusDeogloria is the next Creationist to be named and shamed. His video will be in production shortly.
UPDATE (04/08/08):
Just like any other Creationist, NF has now shown up here with his insults and his lies, demanding peer reviewed papers on how Recombination allows for increased variation. Well, no doubt he'll deny them until his Bible chokes him, but here are some resources to give everyone else who is interested a start.
Science Daily: Genetic Recombination
sciencedaily.com/articles/g/genetic_recombination.htm
Genetic Recombination Misused: An article refuting creationist misrepresentation of science
evolutionpages.com/Critique%20of%20Ashcraft%20article.htm
(and by the way, the article this is in response to itself, while it is a Creationist article, contradicts NF, because it states that Recombination IS THE ONLY METHOD OF VARIATION; thus contradicting the claim by NF that Recombination prevents changes).
WileyScience Journal: ChemBioChem
www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/109741904/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Construction of a 10,000 marker ultra-dense genetic recombination map of Potato: Providing a framework for accelerated gene isolation and a genome-wide physical map
genetics.org/cgi/content/abstract/genetics.106.055871v1
ScienceDirect: Genetic recombination at different points in the Npro-coding region of bovine viral diarrhea viruses and the potentials to change their antigenicities and pathogenicities (this one I KNOW will go over NF's head)
sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6T32-4H8MNMB-2&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=5d35d9e2fba9606889ec5b12181ad90c
PLEASE READ CAREFULLY.
I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
http://www.aclunc.org/issues/technolo...
Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/...
Censorship is NOT a valid argument.
This is a video series that reveals Creationists for what they truly are; closed minded and completely incorrect.
Nephilimfree is the Creationist featured in this video. He is the master of the condescending look and his claims are laughable. Each one of his claims is debunked in the following documents:
Talk Origins: Are Mutations Harmful?
talkorigins.org/faqs/mutations.html
Talk Origins: Response to Creationist Claim CB101: "Most Mutations are Harmful" (Henry Morris)
talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB101.html
Gate.Net: Beneficial Mutations
gate.net/~rwms/EvoMutations.html
New Scientist: E.Coli and Citrate+ Ingestion - A new genetic trait
newscientist.com/channel/life/dn14094-bacteria-make-major-evolutionary-shift-in-the-lab.html
Talk Origins: "Plagiarised Errors and Molecular Genetics"
(includes the section on Duane Gish's argument about Pseudogenes and "Backups")
talkorigins.org/faqs/molgen
Not relevant to the video but interesting nonetheless:
Transcripts of the Kitzmiller Vs Dover Trial:
talkorigins.org/faqs/dover/kitzmiller_v_dover.html
Also available here:
aclupa.org/legal/legaldocket/intelligentdesigncase/dovertrialtranscripts.htm
