Uploaded December 2010 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago

---

Update: Comment approval now removed. You are free to comment as you wish. This will be revisited if anyone else tries to circumvent a channel ban in future.

PLEASE READ CAREFULLY:

I'm citing "Fair Use" under US Copyright Act, Title 17 512 (g)(f), specifically those clauses covering Comment and Criticism, as well as the DMCA.
aclunc.org/issues/technology/blog/asset_upload_file939_6218.pdf

Also "Fair Dealing" under UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 c.48, Part 1(Copyright) Section 79.4a
opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/ukpga_19880048_en_4

Censorship is NOT a valid argument.

This is the third part of my critical analysis of "What The Bleep Do We Know?! Down The Rabbit Hole".

Future parts will be longer than 15 minutes, so should require fewer videos overall.

Update 17 May 2012: YouTube user Paxmax found this paper in the journal "Nature Nanotechnology" - nature.com/nnano/journal/v7/n5/full/nnano.2012.34.html