@filmandmediastudieschannel
  @filmandmediastudieschannel
Film & Media Studies | Christian Metz's Film Semiotics Part 2: Syntagmatic vs Paradigmatic @filmandmediastudieschannel | Uploaded 2 years ago | Updated 4 hours ago
This is the second and final video on Christian Metz's film semiotics, where we're looking at Metz's book Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema. In this video, we're examining the positive side of Metz's argument that cinema is a "language" rather than a "language system" by learning about how film signifies through a "syntagmatic" chain.

The video defines the distinction between the terms syntagmatic and paradigmatic by looking at how these terms were employed by Ferdinand de Saussure, and then it gives an example of film as syntagmatic chain with the opening of Strangers on a Train (Hitchcock, 1950).
Christian Metzs Film Semiotics Part 2: Syntagmatic vs ParadigmaticSergei Eisensteins Theory of Animation: Plasmatic DisneyDiscontinuity Editing Part 3: Sergei Eisenstein and Alfred HitchcockBazins Evolution of the Language of Cinema Part 2Hugo Munsterbergs The PhotoplayWhat Unfriended (2014) Teaches Us About BufferingMulveys Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema and Psychoanalytic TheoryContingent Motionbell hookss Oppositional Gaze: Black Female SpectatorsGilles Deleuzes Movement-Image and Time-Image, Explainedbell hookss The Oppositional Gaze and Jordan Peeles Get Out (2017)Laura Mulveys Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema, Part 3: Vertigo

Christian Metz's Film Semiotics Part 2: Syntagmatic vs Paradigmatic @filmandmediastudieschannel

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER