Uploaded October 2020 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
It’s c1000 and the way crimes are viewed is, unsurprisingly, based on Anglo-Saxon ideas about both justice and how society should be organised. The most notable of these beliefs are: that the role of the community in policing the behaviour of others is very important, that God is the final judge of guilt or innocence and that the status and position of different groups should be clear in the law.
#GCSEHistory #GCSERevision #CrimeAndPunishmentGCSE
PATREON: patreon.com/alonglongtimeago
Revision Notes:
- How crimes were viewed was based on Anglo-Saxon ideas about justice and how society should be organised
They believed:
- The role of the local community in policing the behaviour of others was very important
- That god was the final judge of innocence or guilt
- The status and position of different groups should be clear in law
- The role of the community in enforcing the law
- They believed it was the victim’s responsibility to seek justice
- But also that the community should play a part in delivering justice
- Being loyal to your community was seen as a duty
- By the 10th cent English shires were divided into smaller areas called hundreds
- Each hundred was divided into 10 tithings
- All the men (aged 12+) in a tithing were responsible for the behaviour of all the others
- One man from each hundred and one man from each tithing had to meet regularly with the king’s shire reeve (sheriff)
- Their role was to prevent crime, particularly cattle theft, in their communities
- When chasing a cattle thief a ‘hundredsman’ was entitled to take two ‘tithingmen’ with him
- These developments made the community increasingly important in Saxon law enforcement
- The community as a whole was also responsible for tracking down those suspected of crimes
- Anyone who witnessed a crime could raise a ‘hue and cry’ (a shout for help)
- Everyone who heard was expected to help chase and capture the suspects
- Taking Oaths
- Saxon justice relied heavily on religion when deciding guilt
- Oaths were an important way of proving innocence
- Hearings took place in public and the accused could swear their innocence under oath
- They could also call upon others in the community to support their claims as ‘oath helpers'
- In most cases the accused walked free
- Whilst it may seem ineffective, in small, tight-knit communities it would be very hard for a criminal to get away with a repeat offence
- If they were a repeat offender or had been caught red-handed, they weren’t given the option of swearing an oath of innocence
- Trial by Ordeal
- In cases where there wasn’t enough evidence to prove a person was guilty, the church had an important role
- The accused could be tried by the church authorities in a ‘trial by ordeal'
- It was a test of guilt in the eyes of god
- Inc trial by hot iron, hot water or cold water
- Trial by hot iron/water: heat used to burn one of the accused’s hands which was then bandaged, if healed well then god judged them to be innocent
- Cold water: accused thrown into water with their arms tied - if u floated u were guilty, sank innocent and were hauled up again
- This was because the water ‘accepted’ the innocent person as pure, whilst the guilty had been ‘rejected’ by it
- Christian thinking also had an influence on Saxon ideas about some punishments
- For some crimes, inc petty theft, the church advised maiming
- The belief was that, unlike execution, this type of punishment gave the criminal time to seek forgiveness from God
FULL NOTES: quizlet.com/_58irn6?x=1jqt&i=1fj39y
IMAGE ATTRIBUTIONS
0:12
"West Stow Anglo-Saxon village" by Midnightblueowl, licensed under CC-BY 3.0
Source: commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=38559494
Licence: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en
Author's Page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Midnightblueowl
0:17
Attribution: User:Mashkawat.ahsan
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en
0:30
Attribution: Jeff Tomlinson
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
0:59
Attribution: Jo Turner
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
1:06
Attribution: Ron Strutt
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
1:38
Attribution: Keith Evans
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
1:45
Attribution: User: (WT-shared) Nick at wts wikivoyage
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/deed.en
3:06
Attribution: Peter Jordan
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
***---Social Media---***
Twitter: twitter.com/alongtimeago_YT | @alongtimeago_YT
Patreon: patreon.com/alonglongtimeago
Insta: instagram.com/alonglongtimeago | @alonglongtimeago
facebook.com/alongtimeagoYT
*The information for this video was sourced from the Pearson Crime & Punishment GCSE history textbook & it is based around the specification for the the Pearson Edexcel 9-1 GCSE History
It’s c1000 and the way crimes are viewed is, unsurprisingly, based on Anglo-Saxon ideas about both justice and how society should be organised. The most notable of these beliefs are: that the role of the community in policing the behaviour of others is very important, that God is the final judge of guilt or innocence and that the status and position of different groups should be clear in the law.
#GCSEHistory #GCSERevision #CrimeAndPunishmentGCSE
PATREON: patreon.com/alonglongtimeago
Revision Notes:
- How crimes were viewed was based on Anglo-Saxon ideas about justice and how society should be organised
They believed:
- The role of the local community in policing the behaviour of others was very important
- That god was the final judge of innocence or guilt
- The status and position of different groups should be clear in law
- The role of the community in enforcing the law
- They believed it was the victim’s responsibility to seek justice
- But also that the community should play a part in delivering justice
- Being loyal to your community was seen as a duty
- By the 10th cent English shires were divided into smaller areas called hundreds
- Each hundred was divided into 10 tithings
- All the men (aged 12+) in a tithing were responsible for the behaviour of all the others
- One man from each hundred and one man from each tithing had to meet regularly with the king’s shire reeve (sheriff)
- Their role was to prevent crime, particularly cattle theft, in their communities
- When chasing a cattle thief a ‘hundredsman’ was entitled to take two ‘tithingmen’ with him
- These developments made the community increasingly important in Saxon law enforcement
- The community as a whole was also responsible for tracking down those suspected of crimes
- Anyone who witnessed a crime could raise a ‘hue and cry’ (a shout for help)
- Everyone who heard was expected to help chase and capture the suspects
- Taking Oaths
- Saxon justice relied heavily on religion when deciding guilt
- Oaths were an important way of proving innocence
- Hearings took place in public and the accused could swear their innocence under oath
- They could also call upon others in the community to support their claims as ‘oath helpers'
- In most cases the accused walked free
- Whilst it may seem ineffective, in small, tight-knit communities it would be very hard for a criminal to get away with a repeat offence
- If they were a repeat offender or had been caught red-handed, they weren’t given the option of swearing an oath of innocence
- Trial by Ordeal
- In cases where there wasn’t enough evidence to prove a person was guilty, the church had an important role
- The accused could be tried by the church authorities in a ‘trial by ordeal'
- It was a test of guilt in the eyes of god
- Inc trial by hot iron, hot water or cold water
- Trial by hot iron/water: heat used to burn one of the accused’s hands which was then bandaged, if healed well then god judged them to be innocent
- Cold water: accused thrown into water with their arms tied - if u floated u were guilty, sank innocent and were hauled up again
- This was because the water ‘accepted’ the innocent person as pure, whilst the guilty had been ‘rejected’ by it
- Christian thinking also had an influence on Saxon ideas about some punishments
- For some crimes, inc petty theft, the church advised maiming
- The belief was that, unlike execution, this type of punishment gave the criminal time to seek forgiveness from God
FULL NOTES: quizlet.com/_58irn6?x=1jqt&i=1fj39y
IMAGE ATTRIBUTIONS
0:12
"West Stow Anglo-Saxon village" by Midnightblueowl, licensed under CC-BY 3.0
Source: commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=38559494
Licence: creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en
Author's Page: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Midnightblueowl
0:17
Attribution: User:Mashkawat.ahsan
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en
0:30
Attribution: Jeff Tomlinson
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
0:59
Attribution: Jo Turner
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
1:06
Attribution: Ron Strutt
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
1:38
Attribution: Keith Evans
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
1:45
Attribution: User: (WT-shared) Nick at wts wikivoyage
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/1.0/deed.en
3:06
Attribution: Peter Jordan
License: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/2.0/deed.en
***---Social Media---***
Twitter: twitter.com/alongtimeago_YT | @alongtimeago_YT
Patreon: patreon.com/alonglongtimeago
Insta: instagram.com/alonglongtimeago | @alonglongtimeago
facebook.com/alongtimeagoYT
*The information for this video was sourced from the Pearson Crime & Punishment GCSE history textbook & it is based around the specification for the the Pearson Edexcel 9-1 GCSE History
