BBC Wrong on Fukushima, Again @GoddardsJournal
BBC Wrong on Fukushima, Again  @GoddardsJournal
Uploaded March 2016 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Response to: bbc.com/news/world-asia-35761141
Expanded upon here: bbc.com/news/world-asia-35761136

Dose-rate conversion:
translatorscafe.com/cafe/EN/units-converter/radiation/24-22/microsievert%2Fhour-millisievert%2Fyear
" 2.8 microsievert/hour = 24.5448 millisievert/year "

Study cited @ 1:40 re regional natural background dose rate of 0.05 uSv/y
Malins et al (2016). Evaluation of ambient dose equivalent rates influenced by vertical and horizontal distribution of radioactive cesium in soil in Fukushima Prefecture. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 151 (2016) 38e49 pubmed.gov/26408835

Study cited @ 3:58
Mozdarani et al (2002). Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of individuals with chronic exposure to gamma radiation. Arch Irn Med, 5(1): 32-36. http://www.ams.ac.ir/AIM/NEWPUB/13/16/8/AIM/0251/32-gamma.pdf

Study cited @ 4:24
Zakeri & Assaei (2004). Cytogenetic monitoring of personnel working in angiocardiography laboratories in Iran hospitals. Mutat Res. 2004 Aug 8;562(1-2):1-9. pubmed.gov/15279825

Study cited @ 4:48
Kendall et al (2013). A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980-2006. Leukemia. 27(1): 3–9. pubmed.gov/22766784

Study cited @ 5:08
Spycher et al (2015). Background ionizing radiation and the risk of childhood cancer: a census-based nationwide cohort study. Environ Health Perspect, 123(6), 622-8. pubmed.com/25707026 Spycher's graphs are in nSv/h, which is nanosieverts per hour and which I converted for this video to microsieverts per hour by the rule: 100 nSv = 0.1 µSv.

@ 8:04, BBC concedes that 122 Chernobyl deaths estimate is misleading
bbc.co.uk/complaints/comp-reports/ecu/banggoesthetheory
BBC: “Two viewers (one of them writing on behalf of 55 co-signatories, most of them academics from a variety of disciplines) complained that the item seriously understated the likely death toll (in relation to both Chernobyl and Fukushima) and, by ignoring scientific opinion which favoured higher estimates.”

Estimate of Chernobyl deaths @ 8:47 from
European Environmental Agency (2013). Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation. EEA Report 1/2013, Chap 18, p. 435, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/late-lessons-2
.
BBC Wrong on Fukushima, AgainFace Masks for Life & LibertyDoes Marijuana Cause Schizophrenia?Harambe was Heroic - RIP☢ Fukushima ☢ Fearmongering DebunkedFukushima Radiation Not Safe!Fukushima Unit 3 Reactor-Well Cap Fractured?Monarch Butterfly Gardening vs Extinction
GoddardsJournal |

BBC Wrong on Fukushima, Again

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER