Uploaded December 2011 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Studies cited in order presented:
National Academy of Sciences Low-Dose Radiation Report
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=R1
Data tables used, 12D-1 and 12D-2:
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=311
http://www.nap.edu/openbook/030909156X/gifmid/311.gif
How to scale that data to unique exposure scenarios, Annex 12D, Example 1:
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=310
15-country study of nuclear-worker cancer risk
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388693
Table 5 shown is from Part II of the study
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388694
iangoddard.com/15countries_Part2_Table5.png
Jacob et al. (2009) meta-analysis of nuclear-worker studies
oem.bmj.com/content/66/12/789.full.pdf
Editorial on Jacob et al. quoted
oem.bmj.com/content/66/12/785.extract
Chromosomal translocations are associated with cancer
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152359
Boffetta et al. (2007) more chromoHarm entails more cancer
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17071846
Bhatti et al. (2010) meta-analysis of chromosomal damage
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3075914
# Addendum #
Since I posted this video, the 'Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' published a special edition on low-dose radiation, the lead article of which
bos.sagepub.com/content/68/3/10.full.pdf
matches and thereby corroborates the case I present in this video. It also covers additional research and nuclear-industry efforts to derail scientific investigation of radiation risks.
Some friends created PDF files of this video available here
In English
docs.google.com/file/d/0B5qUOl0_hAfneW9rWmJ0akNMZEk/edit
In Japanese
docs.google.com/file/d/0B5qUOl0_hAfnWmtwMkNRb0Z2WDA/edit
chernobyl-chubu-jp.org/_userdata/Fukushima%20Radiation%20NOT%20SAFE!.pdf
Studies cited in order presented:
National Academy of Sciences Low-Dose Radiation Report
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=R1
Data tables used, 12D-1 and 12D-2:
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=311
http://www.nap.edu/openbook/030909156X/gifmid/311.gif
How to scale that data to unique exposure scenarios, Annex 12D, Example 1:
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11340&page=310
15-country study of nuclear-worker cancer risk
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388693
Table 5 shown is from Part II of the study
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17388694
iangoddard.com/15countries_Part2_Table5.png
Jacob et al. (2009) meta-analysis of nuclear-worker studies
oem.bmj.com/content/66/12/789.full.pdf
Editorial on Jacob et al. quoted
oem.bmj.com/content/66/12/785.extract
Chromosomal translocations are associated with cancer
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3152359
Boffetta et al. (2007) more chromoHarm entails more cancer
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17071846
Bhatti et al. (2010) meta-analysis of chromosomal damage
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3075914
# Addendum #
Since I posted this video, the 'Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists' published a special edition on low-dose radiation, the lead article of which
bos.sagepub.com/content/68/3/10.full.pdf
matches and thereby corroborates the case I present in this video. It also covers additional research and nuclear-industry efforts to derail scientific investigation of radiation risks.
Some friends created PDF files of this video available here
In English
docs.google.com/file/d/0B5qUOl0_hAfneW9rWmJ0akNMZEk/edit
In Japanese
docs.google.com/file/d/0B5qUOl0_hAfnWmtwMkNRb0Z2WDA/edit
chernobyl-chubu-jp.org/_userdata/Fukushima%20Radiation%20NOT%20SAFE!.pdf
