Uploaded August 2026 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Some companies claim to automate the entire takedown process. The speaker argues that much of this automation is really workflow automation, such as filling out takedown forms.
A complete takedown process also requires monitoring, verification, and confirmation that the action was correct. A mistaken automated takedown could disrupt a legitimate organization, making the final validation step consequential.
The speaker’s position is that roughly 90% can be automated, but the remaining 10% requires human validation.
Which security decisions should remain human-controlled even when most of the workflow can be automated?
Subscribe to our podcasts: securityweekly.com/subscribe
#Automation #SecurityOperations #SecurityWeekly #Cybersecurity #InformationSecurity #AI #InfoSec
Some companies claim to automate the entire takedown process. The speaker argues that much of this automation is really workflow automation, such as filling out takedown forms.
A complete takedown process also requires monitoring, verification, and confirmation that the action was correct. A mistaken automated takedown could disrupt a legitimate organization, making the final validation step consequential.
The speaker’s position is that roughly 90% can be automated, but the remaining 10% requires human validation.
Which security decisions should remain human-controlled even when most of the workflow can be automated?
Subscribe to our podcasts: securityweekly.com/subscribe
#Automation #SecurityOperations #SecurityWeekly #Cybersecurity #InformationSecurity #AI #InfoSec
