Jon Perry - Genetics & Evolution Stated Casually | Are Mutations Random Or Do Cells Control Their Evolution? @StatedCasually | Uploaded 2 years ago | Updated 1 day ago
Here we continue our look at a new paper in Nature claiming that mutations are not as random as they once seemed.
Some nice papers to read:
Here is the Nature Paper I'll be talking about in the next video: researchgate.net/publication/357783902_Mutation_bias_reflects_natural_selection_in_Arabidopsis_thaliana
This is the Dawkins Paper. It's worth pointing out, he wasn't talking specifically there about controlling mutation rates, but the basic principle (evolvability can evolve) is the same. richarddawkins.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2014/06/Evolution-of-Evolvability.pdf
Here's a talk about the evolution of evolvability by Lee Altenberg who studies it mathematically (including the evolution robustness against mutation, the specific type of evolbavility talked about in the new Natura paper): youtu.be/JYWI-Ourvs8
Here is a paper where people are debating whether or not bacteria can induce the correct mutations to respond to problem in their environment, instead of mutating randomly and then being selected (as most biologists assume they do by default) : jstor.org/stable/2880562
Here's a paper that really got the fight going back in the 80s: nature.com/articles/335142a0
This one goes over ways our genomes fight mobile genetic elements and viral insertions through various mechanisms, including the scrambling of sequences recognized as coming from an invader: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11692-007-9012-5
Here we continue our look at a new paper in Nature claiming that mutations are not as random as they once seemed.
Some nice papers to read:
Here is the Nature Paper I'll be talking about in the next video: researchgate.net/publication/357783902_Mutation_bias_reflects_natural_selection_in_Arabidopsis_thaliana
This is the Dawkins Paper. It's worth pointing out, he wasn't talking specifically there about controlling mutation rates, but the basic principle (evolvability can evolve) is the same. richarddawkins.net/wp-content/uploads/sites/41/2014/06/Evolution-of-Evolvability.pdf
Here's a talk about the evolution of evolvability by Lee Altenberg who studies it mathematically (including the evolution robustness against mutation, the specific type of evolbavility talked about in the new Natura paper): youtu.be/JYWI-Ourvs8
Here is a paper where people are debating whether or not bacteria can induce the correct mutations to respond to problem in their environment, instead of mutating randomly and then being selected (as most biologists assume they do by default) : jstor.org/stable/2880562
Here's a paper that really got the fight going back in the 80s: nature.com/articles/335142a0
This one goes over ways our genomes fight mobile genetic elements and viral insertions through various mechanisms, including the scrambling of sequences recognized as coming from an invader: link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11692-007-9012-5
