Uploaded August 2025 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Emphasizing that more measurements (due to shortened distance near massive objects) make things actually farther away, while fewer measurements (due to expanded distance in voids with minimal gravity) make things actually closer, in a physical sense. This suggests a fundamental redefinition of distance in your model, where the number of measurements (e.g., ruler lengths) directly affects the effective distance light travels, potentially compressing its travel time from distant galaxies (e.g., 13.8 billion years) to a much shorter period, like ~6,000 years, as you’ve referenced. This aligns with your broader hypothesis: matter’s gravity creates quantifiable spacetime, and in voids, faster time and stretched distance lead to near-instantaneous causation, explaining “faster-than-expected” motions (e.g., spiral arms at ~220 km/s, plasma jets at 20c, ‘Oumuamua’s acceleration) without dark matter or dark energy. You’ve rejected flat spacetime, cosmic expansion, and dark matter/energy, attributed redshift to gravitational effects, suggested black holes “pull” spacetime, noted electromagnetic effects (e.g., metallic hydrogen), and connected void time dilation (~27,600 years) to ~6,000 years and the distance to Sagittarius A* (~25,000–28,000 light-years). Let’s analyze your claim that more measurements make objects farther and fewer measurements make them closer, testing it against observations and using sources like Physical Review D and The Astrophysical Journal. I’ll incorporate the current date/time (August 1, 2025, 8:35 PM CDT) and keep it concise, building on our discussion.
🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5786927723970560
Emphasizing that more measurements (due to shortened distance near massive objects) make things actually farther away, while fewer measurements (due to expanded distance in voids with minimal gravity) make things actually closer, in a physical sense. This suggests a fundamental redefinition of distance in your model, where the number of measurements (e.g., ruler lengths) directly affects the effective distance light travels, potentially compressing its travel time from distant galaxies (e.g., 13.8 billion years) to a much shorter period, like ~6,000 years, as you’ve referenced. This aligns with your broader hypothesis: matter’s gravity creates quantifiable spacetime, and in voids, faster time and stretched distance lead to near-instantaneous causation, explaining “faster-than-expected” motions (e.g., spiral arms at ~220 km/s, plasma jets at 20c, ‘Oumuamua’s acceleration) without dark matter or dark energy. You’ve rejected flat spacetime, cosmic expansion, and dark matter/energy, attributed redshift to gravitational effects, suggested black holes “pull” spacetime, noted electromagnetic effects (e.g., metallic hydrogen), and connected void time dilation (~27,600 years) to ~6,000 years and the distance to Sagittarius A* (~25,000–28,000 light-years). Let’s analyze your claim that more measurements make objects farther and fewer measurements make them closer, testing it against observations and using sources like Physical Review D and The Astrophysical Journal. I’ll incorporate the current date/time (August 1, 2025, 8:35 PM CDT) and keep it concise, building on our discussion.
🎙️ New to streaming or looking to level up? Check out StreamYard and get $10 discount! 😍 streamyard.com/pal/d/5786927723970560
