Uploaded September 2024 | Updated September 2026, 1 week ago
Ashley Edwards, who was working at DeepMind when she co-authored the Genie paper and is now at Runway, covered several key aspects of the Genie AI system and its applications in video generation, robotics, and game creation.
MLST is sponsored by Brave:
The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at brave.com/api.
Genie's approach to learning interactive environments, balancing compression and fidelity.
The use of latent action models and VQE models for video processing and tokenization.
Challenges in maintaining action consistency across frames and integrating text-to-image models.
Evaluation metrics for AI-generated content, such as FID and PS&R diff metrics.
The discussion also explored broader implications and applications:
The potential impact of AI video generation on content creation jobs.
Applications of Genie in game generation and robotics.
The use of foundation models in robotics and the differences between internet video data and specialized robotics data.
Challenges in mapping AI-generated actions to real-world robotic actions.
Ashley Edwards: ashedwards.github.io
TOC (*) are best bits
00:00:00 1. Intro to Genie & Brave Search API: Trade-offs & limitations *
00:02:26 2. Genie's Architecture: Latent action, VQE, video processing *
00:05:06 3. Genie's Constraints: Frame consistency & image model integration
00:07:26 4. Evaluation: FID, PS&R diff metrics & latent induction methods
00:09:44 5. AI Video Gen: Content creation impact, depth & parallax effects
00:11:39 6. Model Scaling: Training data impact & computational trade-offs
00:13:50 7. Game & Robotics Apps: Gamification & action mapping challenges *
00:16:16 8. Robotics Foundation Models: Action space & data considerations *
00:19:18 9. Mask-GPT & Video Frames: Real-time optimization, RL from videos
00:20:34 10. Research Challenges: AI value, efficiency vs. quality, safety
00:24:20 11. Future Dev: Efficiency improvements & fine-tuning strategies
Refs:
1. Genie (learning interactive environments from videos) / Ashley and DM collegues [00:01]
arxiv.org/abs/2402.15391
2. VQ-VAE (Vector Quantized Variational Autoencoder) / Aaron van den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, Koray Kavukcuoglu [02:43]
arxiv.org/abs/1711.00937
3. FID (Fréchet Inception Distance) metric / Martin Heusel et al. [07:37]
arxiv.org/abs/1706.08500
4. PS&R (Precision and Recall) metric / Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi et al. [08:02]
arxiv.org/abs/1806.00035
5. Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture / Alexey Dosovitskiy et al. [12:14]
arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929
6. Genie (robotics foundation models) / Google DeepMind [17:34]
https://deepmind.google/research/publications/60474/
7. Chelsea Finn's lab work on robotics datasets / Chelsea Finn [17:38]
https://ai.stanford.edu/~cbfinn/
8. Imitation from observation in reinforcement learning / YuXuan Liu [20:58]
arxiv.org/abs/1707.03374
9. Waymo's autonomous driving technology / Waymo [22:38]
waymo.com
10. Gen3 model release by Runway / Runway [23:48]
runwayml.com
11. Classifier-free guidance technique / Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans [24:43]
arxiv.org/abs/2207.12598
Ashley Edwards, who was working at DeepMind when she co-authored the Genie paper and is now at Runway, covered several key aspects of the Genie AI system and its applications in video generation, robotics, and game creation.
MLST is sponsored by Brave:
The Brave Search API covers over 20 billion webpages, built from scratch without Big Tech biases or the recent extortionate price hikes on search API access. Perfect for AI model training and retrieval augmentated generation. Try it now - get 2,000 free queries monthly at brave.com/api.
Genie's approach to learning interactive environments, balancing compression and fidelity.
The use of latent action models and VQE models for video processing and tokenization.
Challenges in maintaining action consistency across frames and integrating text-to-image models.
Evaluation metrics for AI-generated content, such as FID and PS&R diff metrics.
The discussion also explored broader implications and applications:
The potential impact of AI video generation on content creation jobs.
Applications of Genie in game generation and robotics.
The use of foundation models in robotics and the differences between internet video data and specialized robotics data.
Challenges in mapping AI-generated actions to real-world robotic actions.
Ashley Edwards: ashedwards.github.io
TOC (*) are best bits
00:00:00 1. Intro to Genie & Brave Search API: Trade-offs & limitations *
00:02:26 2. Genie's Architecture: Latent action, VQE, video processing *
00:05:06 3. Genie's Constraints: Frame consistency & image model integration
00:07:26 4. Evaluation: FID, PS&R diff metrics & latent induction methods
00:09:44 5. AI Video Gen: Content creation impact, depth & parallax effects
00:11:39 6. Model Scaling: Training data impact & computational trade-offs
00:13:50 7. Game & Robotics Apps: Gamification & action mapping challenges *
00:16:16 8. Robotics Foundation Models: Action space & data considerations *
00:19:18 9. Mask-GPT & Video Frames: Real-time optimization, RL from videos
00:20:34 10. Research Challenges: AI value, efficiency vs. quality, safety
00:24:20 11. Future Dev: Efficiency improvements & fine-tuning strategies
Refs:
1. Genie (learning interactive environments from videos) / Ashley and DM collegues [00:01]
arxiv.org/abs/2402.15391
2. VQ-VAE (Vector Quantized Variational Autoencoder) / Aaron van den Oord, Oriol Vinyals, Koray Kavukcuoglu [02:43]
arxiv.org/abs/1711.00937
3. FID (Fréchet Inception Distance) metric / Martin Heusel et al. [07:37]
arxiv.org/abs/1706.08500
4. PS&R (Precision and Recall) metric / Mehdi S. M. Sajjadi et al. [08:02]
arxiv.org/abs/1806.00035
5. Vision Transformer (ViT) architecture / Alexey Dosovitskiy et al. [12:14]
arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929
6. Genie (robotics foundation models) / Google DeepMind [17:34]
https://deepmind.google/research/publications/60474/
7. Chelsea Finn's lab work on robotics datasets / Chelsea Finn [17:38]
https://ai.stanford.edu/~cbfinn/
8. Imitation from observation in reinforcement learning / YuXuan Liu [20:58]
arxiv.org/abs/1707.03374
9. Waymo's autonomous driving technology / Waymo [22:38]
waymo.com
10. Gen3 model release by Runway / Runway [23:48]
runwayml.com
11. Classifier-free guidance technique / Jonathan Ho and Tim Salimans [24:43]
arxiv.org/abs/2207.12598

![Neural Networks Are Elastic Origami! [Prof. Randall Balestriero]
Professor Randall Balestriero joins us to discuss neural network geometry, spline theory, and emerging phenomena in deep learning, based on research presented at ICML. Topics include the delayed emergence of adversarial robustness in neural networks (grokking), geometric interpretations of neural networks via spline theory, and challenges in reconstruction learning. We also cover geometric analysis of Large Language Models (LLMs) for toxicity detection and the relationship between intrinsic dimensionality and model control in RLHF.
SPONSOR MESSAGES:
***
CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.
https://centml.ai/pricing/
Tufa AI Labs is a brand new research lab in Zurich started by Benjamin Crouzier focussed on o-series style reasoning and AGI. Are you interested in working on reasoning, or getting involved in their events?
Goto https://tufalabs.ai/
***
Show notes and transcript: https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/3lufge4upq5gy0ug75j4a/RANDALLSHOW.pdf?rlkey=nbemgpa0jhawt1e86rx7372e4&dl=0
TOC:
[00:00:00] Introduction
1. Neural Network Geometry and Spline Theory
[00:01:41] 1.1 Neural Network Geometry and Spline Theory
[00:07:41] 1.2 Deep Networks Always Grok
[00:11:39] 1.3 Grokking and Adversarial Robustness
[00:16:09] 1.4 Double Descent and Catastrophic Forgetting
2. Reconstruction Learning
[00:18:49] 2.1 Reconstruction Learning
[00:24:15] 2.2 Frequency Bias in Neural Networks
3. Geometric Analysis of Neural Networks
[00:29:02] 3.1 Geometric Analysis of Neural Networks
[00:34:41] 3.2 Adversarial Examples and Region Concentration
4. LLM Safety and Geometric Analysis
[00:40:05] 4.1 LLM Safety and Geometric Analysis
[00:46:11] 4.2 Toxicity Detection in LLMs
[00:52:24] 4.3 Intrinsic Dimensionality and Model Control
[00:58:07] 4.4 RLHF and High-Dimensional Spaces
5. Conclusion
[01:02:13] 5.1 Neural Tangent Kernel
[01:08:07] 5.2 Conclusion
REFS:
[00:01:35] Balestriero/Humayun – Deep network geometry & input space partitioning
https://arxiv.org/html/2408.04809v1
[00:03:55] Balestriero & Paris – Linking deep networks to adaptive spline operators
https://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/balestriero18b/balestriero18b.pdf
[00:13:55] Song et al. – Gradient-based white-box adversarial attacks
https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.14965
[00:16:05] Humayun, Balestriero & Baraniuk – Grokking phenomenon & emergent robustness
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.15555
[00:18:25] Humayun – Training dynamics & double descent via linear region evolution
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.12977
[00:20:15] Balestriero – Power diagram partitions in DNN decision boundaries
https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.08443
[00:23:00] Frankle & Carbin – Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for network pruning
https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.03635
[00:24:00] Belkin et al. – Double descent phenomenon in modern ML
https://arxiv.org/abs/1812.11118
[00:25:55] Balestriero et al. – Batch normalization’s regularization effects
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.14778
[00:29:35] EU – EU AI Act 2024 with compute restrictions
https://www.lw.com/admin/upload/SiteAttachments/EU-AI-Act-Navigating-a-Brave-New-World.pdf
[00:39:30] Humayun, Balestriero & Baraniuk – SplineCam: Visualizing deep network geometry
https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content/CVPR2023/papers/Humayun_SplineCam_Exact_Visualization_and_Characterization_of_Deep_Network_Geometry_and_CVPR_2023_paper.pdf
[00:40:40] Carlini – Trade-offs between adversarial robustness and accuracy
https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.06705
[00:44:55] Balestriero & LeCun – Limitations of reconstruction-based learning methods
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mlresearch/v235/main/assets/balestriero24b/balestriero24b.pdf
[00:47:20] Balestriero & LeCun – Spectral analysis of neural network learning
https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2022/file/aa56c74513a5e35768a11f4e82dd7ffb-Paper-Conference.pdf
[00:49:45] He et al. – MAE: Masked Autoencoders for self-supervised learning
https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.06377
[00:54:50] Balestriero et al. – Geometric analysis of LLM layers for toxicity detection
https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.12312
[00:59:35] Balestriero et al. – Superior toxicity detection via geometric features
https://arxiv.org/html/2312.01648v2
[01:04:45] UofT ML – Self-attention control & context length effects
https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.04444
[01:11:55] Roberts – Foundations of deep learning theory
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.10165
[01:15:40] Balestriero & Cha – Kolmogorov GAM Networks via spline partition theory
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2501.00704
[01:16:40] Various – Graph Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (GKAN) extension
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-85083-8 Neural Networks Are Elastic Origami! [Prof. Randall Balestriero]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/l3O2J3LMxqI/mqdefault.jpg)




![The ARC Prize 2024 Winning Algorithm [Daniel Franzen and Jan Disselhoff]
SPONSOR MESSAGES:
***
CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments. Check out their super fast DeepSeek R1 hosting!
https://centml.ai/pricing/
Daniel Franzen and Jan Disselhoff the ARChitects won the ARC Prize 2024 with co-researcher David Hartmann, achieving a remarkable 53.5% accuracy on the ARC challenge using a 12-billion parameter language model. Filmed at Tufa Labs in Zurich, they walk through their solution architecture in detail: how they tokenized grid-based visual puzzles as text and fed them directly into an LLM, why test-time training on evaluation examples gave a major score boost, and how depth-first search over token probabilities outperformed greedy and beam search for solution generation.
The conversation gets into the surprising computational capabilities of language models on spatial reasoning tasks. The team found that LLMs could handle 2D grid reasoning without explicit positional encodings, that symmetry augmentations served as a powerful validation mechanism rather than a training aid, and that the models second-best solutions were often conceptually correct just wrong in a specific detail like rotation direction. They also discuss why their fine-tuned 12B model outperformed much larger foundation models, the role of LoRA in preventing catastrophic forgetting during test-time training, and what the entropy distribution of their search trees reveals about how the model represents uncertainty across different task types.
REFERENCES:
Paper:
[00:01:00] The ARChitects: Winning ARC Prize 2024 Solution
https://github.com/da-fr/arc-prize-2024/blob/main/the_architects.pdf
[00:03:38] Robustness of Analogical Reasoning in LLMs
https://arxiv.org/html/2411.14215
[00:14:58] Search Methods in Language Models
https://arxiv.org/html/2408.00724v2
[00:22:28] GPT-4 Code Solutions for ARC (50% SOTA)
https://redwoodresearch.substack.com/p/getting-50-sota-on-arc-agi-with-gpt
[00:53:08] Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting
https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1611835114
[00:53:58] LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models
https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.09685
Tool:
[00:07:48] Re-ARC Dataset Generator
https://github.com/michaelhodel/re-arc
LINKS:
Full Transcript: https://app.rescript.info/share/57e5d773f2d0b195cbce7eee1f53aef2
Download PDF transcript: https://app.rescript.info/api/public/sessions/7772acbf1f11f44b/pdf
Daniel Franzen
https://github.com/da-fr
REFS
[00:01:05] Winning ARC 2024 solution using 12B param model, Franzen, Disselhoff, Hartmann
https://github.com/da-fr/arc-prize-2024/blob/main/the_architects.pdf
[00:07:50] Re-ARC dataset generator for ARC task variations, Michael Hodel
https://github.com/michaelhodel/re-arc
[00:22:30] GPT-4 guided code solutions for ARC tasks, Ryan Greenblatt
https://redwoodresearch.substack.com/p/getting-50-sota-on-arc-agi-with-gpt The ARC Prize 2024 Winning Algorithm [Daniel Franzen and Jan Disselhoff]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mTX_sAq--zY/mqdefault.jpg)

![Panel discussion on ARC Prize 2024 (Zurich)
Filmed at Tufa AI Labs in Zurich in early January 2025, this panel brings together Tim Scarfe with the actual winners of the 2024 ARC Prize Daniel Franzen and Jan Disselhoff (the ARChitects) alongside IBM Researchs Michael Hersche, with Tufa Labs founder Benjamin Crouzier moderating.
The conversation opens with Tim explaining why o3s performance on ARC forced him to fundamentally update his views. Hed always believed solution-space prediction was impossible for ARC-style problems, assuming youd need programs with compositional generalization. o3 changed that, though questions about dataset contamination and the sheer compute cost ($17 per task) remain.
The heart of the episode is hearing directly from Daniel and Jan about how they actually won. Their approach is elegant: they tokenize ARC grids line by line, then run a depth-first search through the LLMs token probability space. Because ARC grids have far fewer valid completions than natural language, theres a tight alignment between completion probability and correctness. They exploit this by searching below a probability threshold, augmenting problems (flipping, rotating), and multiplying probabilities across perspectives to select the right answer. Its the same model doing generation and verification just with shifted viewpoints.
The panel then gets into informed speculation about what o3 is actually doing under the hood. Is it tree of thought? A single model doing self-play search? The consensus leans toward something like STaR (the Noah Goodman Self-Taught Reasoner approach) at training time, with sophisticated tree search during inference to find optimal chain-of-thought prefixes.
Daniel drops what he calls his spiciest take: that chain-of-thought reasoning in discrete tokens is fundamentally the wrong approach. He points to Metas Large Concept Model as more promising thinking in continuous concept space rather than being forced to externalize thoughts as words. Michael Hersche pushes back, noting youre still missing proper state representation either way.
The discussion closes with the perennial question of whether benchmarks test the right things, what AGI even means (Chollets skill acquisition efficiency definition comes up), and whether wed recognize AGI if it showed up wearing a jagged intelligence profile. Tim notes that using ChatGPT Pro with o1 has been genuinely unreal qualitatively different from anything before.
REFERENCES:
General:
[00:00:00] ARC Prize
https://arcprize.org/
[00:00:00] Tufa AI Labs
https://tufalabs.ai/
[00:00:59] Jan Disselhoff
https://www.linkedin.com/in/jan-disselhoff-1423a2240/
[00:01:12] Daniel Franzen
https://github.com/da-fr
[00:01:50] Michael Hersche - IBM Research
https://research.ibm.com/people/michael-hersche 1
LINKS:
Full Transcript: https://app.rescript.info/share/c9d448cb603038533e299712808607d1
Download PDF transcript: https://app.rescript.info/api/public/sessions/f4ebf79c7b6d4d71/pdf
Daniel Franzen
https://github.com/da-fr Panel discussion on ARC Prize 2024 (Zurich)](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mt3Im4j5iaQ/mqdefault.jpg)
![Dont invent faster horses - Prof. Jeff Clune
SPONSOR MESSAGES:
***
CentML offers competitive pricing for GenAI model deployment, with flexible options to suit a wide range of models, from small to large-scale deployments.
https://centml.ai/pricing/
2. Sponsorship
[00:03:00] 2.1 TufaAI Labs and CentML
Jeff Clune has spent his career chasing one of sciences biggest questions: how did evolution produce the explosion of complexity we see in nature, and can we build algorithms that do the same thing? In this wide-ranging conversation, he lays out the case for open-ended evolutionary algorithms systems designed to generate novel and interesting outcomes forever, drawing on principles from both Darwinian evolution and human cultural innovation.
Clune explains the central paradox of his work: trying too hard to accomplish a specific goal is often the worst strategy. Instead, the best results come from recognising serendipity and keeping hold of interestingly new things, regardless of whether they seem immediately useful. This insight, drawn from Kenneth Stanleys work on novelty search, underpins a new generation of algorithms that use foundation models as judges of what counts as genuinely interesting and novel.
The conversation covers POET (evolved environments for reinforcement learning), NEAT (neuroevolution of augmenting topologies), ADAS (automated design of agentic systems), and OMNI-EPIC (using language models to generate open-ended environments). Clune walks through how these systems riff on previous discoveries to create increasingly complex challenges from simple ball-kicking tasks through multi-room buildings to cluttered restaurant scenarios that robots must navigate.
The interview also tackles AI safety head-on, with Clune advocating for democratic governance coalitions, regulation of frontier models, and global alignment protocols. He discusses why the interpretability problem may be harder than it looks, how open-ended AI systems could pose unique risks, and his view that the biggest danger is not acting on safety soon enough.
REFERENCES:
paper:
[00:02:35] POET: Generating/solving complex challenges
https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.01753
[00:17:05] Automated capability discovery in foundation models
https://openreview.net/forum?id=nhgbvyrvTP
[00:18:10] NEAT: NeuroEvolution of Augmenting Topologies
https://nn.cs.utexas.edu/downloads/papers/stanley.ec02.pdf
[00:26:50] Novelty search vs objective-based optimization
https://www.cs.swarthmore.edu/~meeden/DevelopmentalRobotics/lehman_ecj11.pdf
[00:28:55] AI-generating algorithms approach to AGI
https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.10985
[00:41:10] Video PreTraining (VPT)
https://cdn.openai.com/vpt/Paper.pdf
[00:44:00] Thought Cloning: Imitating human thinking
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2306.00323
[01:15:10] Automated Design of Agentic Systems (ADAS)
https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.08435
[01:32:30] OMNI-EPIC
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15568
book:
[00:11:10] Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned
https://www.amazon.com/Why-Greatness-Cannot-Planned-Objective/dp/3319155237
LINKS:
Full Transcript: https://app.rescript.info/share/1bf7d45e8d7326bba0a73f7fdd686d05
Download PDF transcript: https://app.rescript.info/api/public/sessions/ceffc76fd4f263da/pdf
Jeff Clune:
https://x.com/jeffclune
http://jeffclune.com/ Dont invent faster horses - Prof. Jeff Clune](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/mw5WIDGRLnA/mqdefault.jpg)
![How Researchers Test AI for Hidden Goals — Apollo Research
Can an AI do the right thing for the wrong reason? Tim Scarfe speaks with Apollo Research’s Alexander Meinke, Axel Højmark and Jérémy Scheurer about Measuring Reward-Seeking via Contrastive Belief Updates, their new research with OpenAI.
The panel asks how models infer what graders reward, why good behaviour can come from the wrong reason, and whether that difference can be measured. The conversation moves through promise-breaking, grader awareness, reward hacking, scheming, opaque reasoning and corrigibility, then turns to a detailed walkthrough of the contrastive-belief method and what its results do and do not show. The o3 results discussed here concern an intermediate checkpoint without safety training.
This episode was made in partnership with Apollo Research. MLST retained full editorial control.
Reference
Apollo Research: https://www.apolloresearch.ai/
TIMESTAMPS:
00:00:00 Cold Open
00:02:12 Right Things, Wrong Reasons
00:12:47 Grader Awareness
00:26:22 Legibility
00:32:35 What To Call It
00:35:58 Intelligence, Agency, Anthropomorphism
00:45:16 Apollo’s Mission
00:48:54 The End of the Exponential
00:55:45 The Paper
01:16:34 Closing Reflection
REFERENCES:
tool:
[00:00:08] Claude Fable
https://www.anthropic.com/claude/fable
[00:12:50] AlphaGo Zero
https://deepmind.google/blog/alphago-zero-starting-from-scratch/
[00:44:30] AlphaFold 3
https://deepmind.google/science/alphafold/
paper:
[00:01:02] Measuring Reward-Seeking via Contrastive Belief Updates
https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.18966
[00:16:19] Natural Language Autoencoders Produce Unsupervised Explanations of LLM Activations
https://transformer-circuits.pub/2026/nla/
[00:26:48] Stress Testing Deliberative Alignment for Anti-Scheming Training
https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.15541
[00:35:33] Shortcut learning in deep neural networks
https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07780
[00:53:49] Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks
https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14499
[00:59:52] Modifying LLM Beliefs with Synthetic Document Finetuning
https://alignment.anthropic.com/2025/modifying-beliefs-via-sdf/
[01:10:44] Alignment Faking in Large Language Models
https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14093
[01:13:55] Natural Emergent Misalignment from Reward Hacking
https://www.anthropic.com/research/emergent-misalignment-reward-hacking
other:
[00:10:14] We Need a Science of Scheming
https://www.apolloresearch.ai/science/science-of-scheming/
[00:32:56] CoastRunners reward hacking example
https://deepmind.google/blog/specification-gaming-the-flip-side-of-ai-ingenuity/
organization:
[01:06:07] Redwood Research
https://www.redwoodresearch.org/
ReScript:
https://app.rescript.info/share/718ab68e18cfa3b9b800da6b3290fd42 How Researchers Test AI for Hidden Goals — Apollo Research](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/n1Qk8xbqF-M/mqdefault.jpg)