dewinthemorning | A Question to Inmendham and to All Other Antinatalists/Efilists @dewinthemorning | Uploaded November 2014 | Updated October 2024, 37 minutes ago.
I present my thought experiment - Imagine that just before Inmendham was born, a man who had a philosophy like his efilism, was elected for a president of the USA. This president managed to get all the power in the USA and enacted the laws of efilism - it wasn't allowed for any children to be born any more. This had many consequences for life in the USA because now, only people of Inmendham's age or older would be living in the USA. What would the efilists think about that?
@Juan Alejo asked me in the comments "Are you trying to say that antinatalism is impractical?" I think my answer belongs here, in the description:
That "... antinatalism is impractical" is the least objection from the BILLIONS of people who are not antinatalists/efilists. They would have numerous other objections if they ever heard of that ideology. No, the fact that "... antinatalism is impractical" is one aspect of the proposed line of actions of efilism that could interest the SEVERAL followers of that ideology, because that would affect them personally. That's what I am highlighting here.
A video, related to the topic here: youtube.com/watch?v=ux1GxExRUUY
I present my thought experiment - Imagine that just before Inmendham was born, a man who had a philosophy like his efilism, was elected for a president of the USA. This president managed to get all the power in the USA and enacted the laws of efilism - it wasn't allowed for any children to be born any more. This had many consequences for life in the USA because now, only people of Inmendham's age or older would be living in the USA. What would the efilists think about that?
@Juan Alejo asked me in the comments "Are you trying to say that antinatalism is impractical?" I think my answer belongs here, in the description:
That "... antinatalism is impractical" is the least objection from the BILLIONS of people who are not antinatalists/efilists. They would have numerous other objections if they ever heard of that ideology. No, the fact that "... antinatalism is impractical" is one aspect of the proposed line of actions of efilism that could interest the SEVERAL followers of that ideology, because that would affect them personally. That's what I am highlighting here.
A video, related to the topic here: youtube.com/watch?v=ux1GxExRUUY
