WL Craig - The Borde, Guth, Vilenkin Theorem Is NOT Conclusive After All, Says Scientist @dewinthemorning

WL Craig - The Borde, Guth, Vilenkin Theorem Is NOT Conclusive After All, Says Scientist @dewinthemorning

Uploaded October 2012 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago

A link to Sean Caroll's answer to WL Craig's podcast:
reasonablefaith.org/sean-carrolls-reply-to-the-rf-podcast

If you're only interested in the BGV theorem, start watching at 5:05.

Craig's podcasts on "Sean Caroll and God":
reasonablefaith.org/sean-carroll-on-science-and-god

A link to my video that I mention at the beginning:
youtube.com/watch?v=TFGJMc69BnM&lc=SYkQMyHPfyifhSl2H43b1w3vNfTr5uvCCiWi0KXKGww&feature=inbox

WL Craig - The Borde, Guth, Vilenkin Theorem Is NOT Conclusive After All, Says Scientist

Craig is NOT an Objective Debater

Portrait of Dishonesty (WL Craig) 2 - Mirror from BikerMan (with my voice-over)

Refutation of A. Plantingas (Modal) New Ontological Argument - It bears repeating

A Tentative Explanation of the Phenomenon Inmendham - The Zig-Zag Man

Why Dawkins Wont Debate Craig Part 3 - Language, Dr.Craig!

The Moral Argument Goes The Way Of All Flesh, Part II - The Nazi Variant

Choveshki Prava/Human Rights (in Bulgarian and English)

Inmendham Calls Humans Bugs! Would He Want the Use of Zyklone B (an insecticide) on Humans (Bugs)?

Evolution and Natural Selection (Dawkins and the Selfish Gene) - Part X

dewinthemorning |

WL Craig - The Borde, Guth, Vilenkin Theorem Is NOT Conclusive After All, Says Scientist