Michael Pierce | A Critique of the "Big Five" (4/4) @MichaelPiercePhilosophy | Uploaded September 2019 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
I WROTE A BOOK:
Purchase the print paperback: amazon.com/dp/B089278TWR/ref=cm_sw_r_apa_i_l9.XEb3FR3K3B
Purchase the ebook pdf: subjectobjectmichaelpierce.blogspot.com/p/buy-my-book.html?m=1
__________________

H.J. Eysenck, "Four Ways Five Factors Are Not Basic," abstract
differentialclub.wdfiles.com/local--files/personality-structure/Eysenck1992_4ways_are_NOT_basic.pdf

Jack Block, "The Five-Factor Framing of Personality and Beyond: Some Ruminations," abstract
http://psychology.okstate.edu/faculty/jgrice/psyc4333/Block_Jack_2010.pdf

Paunonen and Jackson, "What is Beyond the Big Five? Plenty!" abstract
simine.com/240/readings/Paunonen_and_Jackson_(8).pdf

John Searle's story is found in "Word Turned Upside Down." New York Review of Books, Volume 30, Number 16; October 27, 1983.
And no, I did not go to that reference directly. I got it from a secondary source. So if it isn't really there, let me know.