@TheDissenterRL
  @TheDissenterRL
The Dissenter | #954 Jonathan Matheson: Why It's OK Not to Think for Yourself @TheDissenterRL | Uploaded June 2024 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
******Support the channel******
Patreon: patreon.com/thedissenter
PayPal: paypal.me/thedissenter
PayPal Subscription 1 Dollar: tinyurl.com/yb3acuuy
PayPal Subscription 3 Dollars: tinyurl.com/ybn6bg9l
PayPal Subscription 5 Dollars: tinyurl.com/ycmr9gpz
PayPal Subscription 10 Dollars: tinyurl.com/y9r3fc9m
PayPal Subscription 20 Dollars: tinyurl.com/y95uvkao

******Follow me on******
Website: thedissenter.net
Facebook: facebook.com/thedissenteryt
Twitter: twitter.com/TheDissenterYT
Podcast: bit.ly/3FeSNqb

This show is sponsored by Enlites, Learning & Development done differently. Check the website here: enlites.com

RECORDED ON JANUARY 17th 2024.
Dr. Jonathan Matheson is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of North Florida specializing in epistemology. His primary research interests concern the epistemic significance of disagreement. He also has research interests in ethics, metaphysics, and philosophy of religion. His latest book is Why It's OK Not to Think for Yourself.

In this episode, we focus on Why It’s OK Not to Think for Yourself. We start by discussing where the idea that people should think for themselves comes from, and social epistemology and the wisdom of crowds. We talk about who we should rely on, how to identify the experts, why we cannot properly evaluate all kinds of information by ourselves, and how we need to rely on other people and on accumulated knowledge. We go through the main objections to Dr. Matheson’s thesis, namely the autonomy objection, the free-rider objection, the Socratic objection, the objection of epistemic vulnerability, the understanding objection, and the intellectual virtue objection. Finally, we discuss epistemic responsibility, and cases where it is not OK to not think for yourself.

Time Links:
00:00 Intro
00:27 Where the idea that people should think for themselves comes from
06:42 Social epistemology
08:39 The wisdom of crowds
10:51 Who should we rely on?
13:17 Can we properly evaluate all kinds of information by ourselves?
16:56 Identifying the experts
27:42 Relying on other people and on accumulated knowledge
30:10 The autonomy objection
37:09 The free-rider objection
42:53 The Socratic objection
47:28 Epistemic vulnerability
51:19 The understanding objection
55:15 Intellectual virtues
1:04:41 Epistemic responsibility
1:10:04 Cases where it is not OK to not think for yourself
1:13:08 Follow Dr. Matheson’s work!
--
Follow Dr. Matheson’s work:
Website: bit.ly/3RFniMW
PhilPeople profile: bit.ly/3rrpa1f
Why It's OK Not to Think for Yourself: bit.ly/49o3X9B
--
A HUGE THANK YOU TO MY PATRONS/SUPPORTERS: PER HELGE LARSEN, JERRY MULLER, HANS FREDRIK SUNDE, BERNARDO SEIXAS, ADAM KESSEL, MATTHEW WHITINGBIRD, ARNAUD WOLFF, TIM HOLLOSY, HENRIK AHLENIUS, FILIP FORS CONNOLLY, DAN DEMETRIOU, ROBERT WINDHAGER, RUI INACIO, ZOOP, MARCO NEVES, COLIN HOLBROOK, PHIL KAVANAGH, SAMUEL ANDREEFF, FRANCIS FORDE, TIAGO NUNES, FERGAL CUSSEN, HAL HERZOG, NUNO MACHADO, JONATHAN LEIBRANT, JOÃO LINHARES, STANTON T, SAMUEL CORREA, ERIK HAINES, MARK SMITH, JOÃO EIRA, TOM HUMMEL, SARDUS FRANCE, DAVID SLOAN WILSON, YACILA DEZA-ARAUJO, ROMAIN ROCH, DIEGO LONDOÑO CORREA, YANICK PUNTER, CHARLOTTE BLEASE, NICOLE BARBARO, ADAM HUNT, PAWEL OSTASZEWSKI, NELLEKE BAK, GUY MADISON, GARY G HELLMANN, SAIMA AFZAL, ADRIAN JAEGGI, PAULO TOLENTINO, JOÃO BARBOSA, JULIAN PRICE, EDWARD HALL, HEDIN BRØNNER, DOUGLAS FRY, FRANCA BORTOLOTTI, GABRIEL PONS CORTÈS, URSULA LITZCKE, SCOTT, ZACHARY FISH, TIM DUFFY, SUNNY SMITH, JON WISMAN, WILLIAM BUCKNER, PAUL-GEORGE ARNAUD, LUKE GLOWACKI, GEORGIOS THEOPHANOUS, CHRIS WILLIAMSON, PETER WOLOSZYN, DAVID WILLIAMS, DIOGO COSTA, ANTON ERIKSSON, ALEX CHAU, AMAURI MARTÍNEZ, CORALIE CHEVALLIER, BANGALORE ATHEISTS, LARRY D. LEE JR., OLD HERRINGBONE, MICHAEL BAILEY, DAN SPERBER, ROBERT GRESSIS, IGOR N, JEFF MCMAHAN, JAKE ZUEHL, BARNABAS RADICS, MARK CAMPBELL, TOMAS DAUBNER, LUKE NISSEN, KIMBERLY JOHNSON, JESSICA NOWICKI, LINDA BRANDIN, NIKLAS CARLSSON, GEORGE CHORIATIS, VALENTIN STEINMANN, PER KRAULIS, KATE VON GOELER, ALEXANDER HUBBARD, BR, MASOUD ALIMOHAMMADI, JONAS HERTNER, URSULA GOODENOUGH, DAVID PINSOF, SEAN NELSON, MIKE LAVIGNE, JOS KNECHT, ERIK ENGMAN, LUCY, YHONATAN SHEMESH, MANVIR SINGH, PETRA WEIMANN, AND PEDRO BONILLA!
A SPECIAL THANKS TO MY PRODUCERS, YZAR WEHBE, JIM FRANK, ŁUKASZ STAFINIAK, TOM VANEGDOM, BERNARD HUGUENEY, CURTIS DIXON, BENEDIKT MUELLER, THOMAS TRUMBLE, KATHRINE AND PATRICK TOBIN, JONCARLO MONTENEGRO, AL NICK ORTIZ, NICK GOLDEN, AND CHRISTINE GLASS!
AND TO MY EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS, MATTHEW LAVENDER, SERGIU CODREANU, BOGDAN KANIVETS, ROSEY, AND GREGORY HASTINGS!

#TheDissenter #JonathanMatheson #Philosophy
#954 Jonathan Matheson: Why Its OK Not to Think for Yourself#942 Fernanda Ferreira: Linguistics, Fluency, Speech Disfluencies, and Comprehension#910 Daniel Simons - Nobodys Fool: Why We Get Taken In and What We Can Do about It#884 Maleen Thiele: Infant Social Learning#820 Joseph Errington: The History of Linguistics, Colonialism, and Language Ideologies#840 Alicia Juarrero - Context Changes Everything: How Constraints Create Coherence#831 Freddie deBoer: How Elites Ate the Social Justice Movement#827 Joseph Henrich: Cross-Cultural Research, Intelligence, Mating Systems, and Religion#983 Vinod Goel - Reason and Less: Pursuing Food, Sex, and Politics#856 Frank Keil: The Development of Causal Thinking, Explanation, and the Institution of Science#1001 Edward Hall: The Philosophy of Causation, and the Structure of Reality#848 Robert Sapolsky - Determined: A Science of Life without Free Will

#954 Jonathan Matheson: Why It's OK Not to Think for Yourself @TheDissenterRL

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER