Uploaded January 2024 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Recently, a “Bible” known as the את Cepher has been gaining popularity among some believers. It incorporates several non-inspired books in its collection, contains numerous inaccurate transliterations and translations, and plagiarizes Wikipedia and other sources. In this video, I explain why you should avoid this “Bible.”
00:00 Introduction
00:22 The Eth Cepher Plagiarizes Wikipedia and Other Sources
02:51 The People Behind the Eth Cepher Are Unqualified
04:30 The Eth Cepher Employs Bizarre, Inaccurate transliterations
06:52 The Eth Cepher Includes Non-Inspired Books
08:25 The Eth Cepher Contains Numerous Mistranslations
10:13 Conclusion
Subscribe to my newsletter: davidwilber.substack.com/subscribe
Check out more of my content on:
Personal website: davidwilber.com
Facebook: facebook.com/DavidWilberBlog
Amazon author page: amazon.com/author/davidwilber
Twitter: twitter.com/DavidWilberBlog
Instagram: instagram.com/davidwilberblog
Recently, a “Bible” known as the את Cepher has been gaining popularity among some believers. It incorporates several non-inspired books in its collection, contains numerous inaccurate transliterations and translations, and plagiarizes Wikipedia and other sources. In this video, I explain why you should avoid this “Bible.”
00:00 Introduction
00:22 The Eth Cepher Plagiarizes Wikipedia and Other Sources
02:51 The People Behind the Eth Cepher Are Unqualified
04:30 The Eth Cepher Employs Bizarre, Inaccurate transliterations
06:52 The Eth Cepher Includes Non-Inspired Books
08:25 The Eth Cepher Contains Numerous Mistranslations
10:13 Conclusion
Subscribe to my newsletter: davidwilber.substack.com/subscribe
Check out more of my content on:
Personal website: davidwilber.com
Facebook: facebook.com/DavidWilberBlog
Amazon author page: amazon.com/author/davidwilber
Twitter: twitter.com/DavidWilberBlog
Instagram: instagram.com/davidwilberblog










