A Response to Dan McClellan on Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 @DavidWilberBlog
A Response to Dan McClellan on Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13 @DavidWilberBlog
Uploaded September 2022 | Updated September 2026, 3 weeks ago
Recently, Dr. Dan McClellan responded to my video on Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13. Dan thinks these passages are ambiguous and that the firm conclusion of most scholars who think these passages are clear is misinformed and simply based on identity politics. Here is my response to his response.

Check out more of my content on:
Personal website: davidwilber.com
Facebook: facebook.com/DavidWilberBlog
Amazon author page: amazon.com/author/davidwilber
Twitter: @dave_wilber
Instagram: @davidwilberblog
A Response to Dan McClellan on Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13The Book of Enoch is Not Scripture: A Friendly ResponseThe Holy Spirit can heal your past | Sermon Clips @FoundedInTruthSean Griffin is Wrong About the Book of Jubilees | David Wilbers ResponseMarital Intimacy on the Sabbath: Does it Violate the Commandment?Sin Sacrifices: A Question That “Topples” Torah Observance?Deny Yourself and Follow Him: The Feast of Dedication (Hanukkah)I Did NOT Mischaracterize Dr. Averbecks Views | Andrew Schumacher Caught Lying Pt. 2What Was Pauls Criticism of the Law in Galatians? #messianicjudaism #yeshua #torahDo not exclude those whom God has welcomed! #shortsCan we follow the Gospel of Jesus AND the Law of Moses at the same time?Nick Fuentes is Wrong: Jesus did Not Replace the Old Testament
David Wilber |

A Response to Dan McClellan on Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER