rockets push off air13:33 basically, the sun is so far away, that no matter where you are on the terminator line, everyone will have the same sunrise and sunset azimuth angles, because the difference from the center of the sun to the center of the earth (equator) and to the top of the earth (north) is .0016 degrees (the distance flattens the earth curve). Later in the video a follow up clip (starts around 17:26), similar to the previous clip but works out the distant sun azimuth angle to about 113 degrees and they prove it with actual data for two cities on the terminator line exactly on opposite latitudes on either side of the equator. Then it compares that to the actual angles and they don't match. In reality, you can only get 113 degrees at the equator. And, the error gets worse the further from the equator you go. It also points out that the sunrise and sunset azimuth angles work only for the equinoxes. The sun rises at 90 degrees and sets at 270 degrees everywhere.
Then comes two clips from the BS detector, he was a legend on here, made some great vids and disappeared. In the first one he makes an argument for the close sun (very easy to follow, he had a nice way of reducing a topic so that anybody could get the point). The second clip he points out problems with the sun angles and the equator, and he references null school (a website that updates the weather data every three hours or so) he showed how the heat map makes no sense on a tilted globe but makes perfect sense on the Gleason's map with a sun that circles above. In fact, null school no longer allows you to view the heat map on the flat earth map any more, and this video from BS detector had something to do with that.
Then the last two clips, one shows that eclipses don't make sense on the globe (you get a zig zag path of totality) but make perfect sense on the Gleason's map (you get circles when you join the paths of totality). The final clip shows you how well we can focus on the sun and moon (looking straight up into the sky, compared to how poorly we can focus on two people at ground level 1.5 miles away. Making the point that the sun and moon are obviously much closer than claimed by the globe preachers.
One tip for watching the first two clips, is to only read the text overlays.
SUNRISE SUNSET AZIMUTH ANGLES prove local sun not 93 million miles away FLAT EARTHrockets push off air2021-01-12 | 13:33 basically, the sun is so far away, that no matter where you are on the terminator line, everyone will have the same sunrise and sunset azimuth angles, because the difference from the center of the sun to the center of the earth (equator) and to the top of the earth (north) is .0016 degrees (the distance flattens the earth curve). Later in the video a follow up clip (starts around 17:26), similar to the previous clip but works out the distant sun azimuth angle to about 113 degrees and they prove it with actual data for two cities on the terminator line exactly on opposite latitudes on either side of the equator. Then it compares that to the actual angles and they don't match. In reality, you can only get 113 degrees at the equator. And, the error gets worse the further from the equator you go. It also points out that the sunrise and sunset azimuth angles work only for the equinoxes. The sun rises at 90 degrees and sets at 270 degrees everywhere.
Then comes two clips from the BS detector, he was a legend on here, made some great vids and disappeared. In the first one he makes an argument for the close sun (very easy to follow, he had a nice way of reducing a topic so that anybody could get the point). The second clip he points out problems with the sun angles and the equator, and he references null school (a website that updates the weather data every three hours or so) he showed how the heat map makes no sense on a tilted globe but makes perfect sense on the Gleason's map with a sun that circles above. In fact, null school no longer allows you to view the heat map on the flat earth map any more, and this video from BS detector had something to do with that.
Then the last two clips, one shows that eclipses don't make sense on the globe (you get a zig zag path of totality) but make perfect sense on the Gleason's map (you get circles when you join the paths of totality). The final clip shows you how well we can focus on the sun and moon (looking straight up into the sky, compared to how poorly we can focus on two people at ground level 1.5 miles away. Making the point that the sun and moon are obviously much closer than claimed by the globe preachers.
One tip for watching the first two clips, is to only read the text overlays.Picture of BBQ on Napkin exposes fake globe earthrockets push off air2024-02-08 | @rocketspushoffair You don't live on a ball!(English) Argentina Prez Slams Elite at Davos! & BONUS SATANIC RITUALrockets push off air2024-01-22 | @rocketspushoffairEMBALMER zeeerockets push off air2024-01-20 | @rocketspushoffair Whistleblower and Embalmer Richard Hirschman joins Lady Zeee to share his findings from injected individuals, with evidence of huge structures growing inside of them and killing them even a year after their shots.Start Speaking Out! [FREEDOM & PROSPERITY] COUP D’ÉTAT {FINAL DEATH BLOW} Start Speaking Out!rockets push off air2024-01-20 | @rocketspushoffair From Biology to Population: Evidence-Based Public Health Lessons and Next Steps — Stockholm Conference, Läkaruppropet (day 2) Jan 22nd 2023 — Doctor's Appeal Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger MSc PhD Privat-Docent is a public health scientist with an international academic research and teaching career in public health at the University of Geneva, Switzerland. She is Professor at the University of Lausanne and Universities of Switzerland as well as for an American University Program on Global Health and Development in Geneva and for the Study Abroad international training program. Astrid has authored more than 180 scientific articles, policy documents and government, EU and UN reports, as well as 12 books. She received an award from Switzerland and from the United Nations Secretary General for her international work and was a consultant and a project collaborator with both the WHO and the UN during her career. Astrid worked for more than 3 years with the WHO in Geneva to develop a training course for member states to implement the WHO International Health Regulation (IHR) as a legally binding law for all member states. Astrid became skeptical about the COVID-19 narrative and the WHO’s interventions at an early stage when she found them to be contrary to the IHR pandemic preparedness guidelines. She wrote several articles where she questioned the risk assessment and emergency management of member states and the massive policy response reported in scientific and media articles.WEF FU 😆😁😂 16M views in one day! (triple play)rockets push off air2024-01-20 | @rocketspushoffair Link to original video on X https://twitter[]com /damonimani/status/1747388354587463766
Transcript
And I appreciate the World Economic Forum providing me the opportunity to be on this stage and say F**K you Claus Schwab and F**K your new world order. We the people were born free we will stay free and you and all of your globalist friends, including everyone in this room, can go F**K yourselves.Sudden Cardiac Deathrockets push off air2024-01-16 | Sudden Cardiac DeathSpike Protein under the microscope & CRAZY FROGrockets push off air2024-01-12 | Spike Protein under the microscope
*FREE* Tyga Type Beat - "CRAZY FROG" ft Offset youtube.com/watch?v=zTB7iBLh-os Produced by: Call Me G @callmeg_._Spike Protein Molecular Biology glycine zippers and protein foldingrockets push off air2024-01-12 | Spike Protein Molecular Biology glycine zippers and protein folding
Dr. Rosanna Chifari is a neurologist in Italy.
The International Covid Summit, organized by the association RéinfoLiberté and the Syndicat Enseignement Recherche Liberté continued in Massy, near Paris.
April 1, 2022- ICS - R.Chifari « The neurological effects of spike »PAYING FOR OUR OWN DESTRUCTIONrockets push off air2024-01-03 | PAYING FOR OUR OWN DESTRUCTIONTEST BALLOONrockets push off air2023-12-23 | TEST BALLOONWatermelons: The Green Movements True Colors by James Delingpole who helped expose Climategate!rockets push off air2023-12-19 | James Delingpole is a bestselling British author and blogger who helped expose the Climategate scandal back in 2009. Reason.tv caught up with Delingpole in Los Angeles recently to learn more about his entertaining and provocative new book Watermelons: The Green Movement's True Colors. At its very roots, argues Delingpole, climate change is an ideological battle, not a scientific one. In other words, it's green on the outside and red on the inside. At the end of the day, according to Delingpole, the "watermelons" of the modern environmental movement do not want to save the world. They want to rule it. http://XN--N-X64S.WSHIDE THE DECLINE 2 (original) CLIMATEGATE SMOKING GUN hockey stick graph! included 😆😁😂rockets push off air2023-12-19 | Climategate is never over! A TOTAL SCAM! More info to come!HIDE THE DECLINE 1 (original) CLIMATEGATE SMOKING GUN hockey stick graph! included 😆😁😂rockets push off air2023-12-19 | Climategate is never over! A TOTAL SCAM! More info to come!CRAZY global warming predictions! Drunk CNN owner 😆😁😂rockets push off air2023-12-18 | Just another HOAX! 😆😁😂Nothing!rockets push off air2023-12-13 | Nothing!
As surprising as it may seem! talkaboutbruno.ca1992 UN Agenda 21 launched by a boy posing as a girlrockets push off air2023-12-09 | Severn Suzuki is a man?The Real Worldrockets push off air2023-12-08 | The Real World20 MILES UP EYE LEVEL HORIZON DOESNT GET ANY FLATTER THAN FLATrockets push off air2023-12-05 | DOESN'T GET ANY FLATTER THAN FLAT 20 MILES UPGPS is based on Surveying & Celestial Navigation GPS requires a flat plane cannot work on a globerockets push off air2023-11-29 | If you don't watch the whole thing, you wont get it. Just like if you want to make a baby, and you stop too soon, then you wonder why you failed. Satellites (or balloons, look up Google Loon) must exist over a horizontal plane. The Google balloon satellites communicate with each other over 60 miles with a laser beam, which is perfectly straight and parallel to the flat motionless ground we live on.
27:50 Says it all!
"Your going to have distortions, if you're trying to force something onto a curved surface that wasn't measured on a curved surface!"
The video can end right there, and this is even mentioned in the video. Why? Because it is pointed out that earth has been measured (surveyed) in x y z coordinates (think graph paper, the z is just elevation) and then these measurements were NECESSARILY necessarily distorted to be put on a curved surface on a globe!--That's the end of the glob!
Google search: * how is mercator projection made * [1st result at top of search, below] His most famous work, the Mercator projection, is a geographical chart where the spherical globe is flattened into a two-dimensional map, with latitude and longitude lines drawn in a straight grid. Mercator's view of the world is one that has endured through the centuries and still helps navigators today. Oct 19, 2023 google.com/search?q=how+is+mercator+projection+made&oq=how+is+mercator&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
Mercator World Map Geradus Mercator's world maps flattened the spherical planet to make it easier to display. Displays of the landmasses are not necessarily proportional to their actual size, especially toward the poles.
If you have ever seen a map of the world in a classroom or in an atlas, chances are you have seen the work of Gerardus Mercator, a 16th-century Flemish cartographer (mapmaker). His most famous work, the Mercator projection, is a geographical chart where the spherical globe is flattened into a two-dimensional map, with latitude and longitude lines drawn in a straight grid. Mercator’s view of the world is one that has endured through the centuries and still helps navigators today.
Mercator was born in Flanders (located in modern-day Belgium) in 1512. The son of a cobbler, Mercator grew up in a poor family. He graduated from the University of Louvain in 1532, where he studied mathematics, geography, and astronomy. After graduating, Mercator developed his skills as an engraver, calligrapher, and geographer, and then began making globes and scientific instruments. As his reputation grew, Mercator published several maps of places around the world. These included an early version of his world map, which showed the globe as a heart-shaped projection.
He continued studying the sciences and making maps and instruments for wealthy, and sometimes high-profile, clients. But in 1544, Mercator was arrested under suspicion of heresy; the traveling he did for research had made church officials wary. After spending a few months in prison, he was released and continued his studies.
In 1569, Mercator published his epic world map. This map, with its Mercator projection, was designed to help sailors navigate around the globe. They could use latitude and longitude lines to plot a straight route. Mercator’s projection laid out the globe as a flattened version of a cylinder. All the latitude and longitude lines intersected at 90-degree angles. Because the projection was intended to be a reference for navigation and not land geography, the landmasses on the map are not necessarily proportional to their actual size; at higher latitudes, landmasses appear larger than their actual size. Despite these distortions, Mercator’s projection is still heavily used today.
In addition to publishing his famous projection, Mercator was the pioneer of another geographical tool we use to this day. He coined the term “atlas” (named after the Greek mythological figure who held the world on his shoulders) to describe a collection of maps. Mercator continued his cartography work for the rest of his life, publishing parts of his atlas until his death in 1594.SHADOWS A Deep Dive 😆😁😂 shadows.flat.wtfrockets push off air2023-08-06 | Direct custom link to video above http://shadows.flat.wtf (In comments you don't need to type http://) North of Tropic of Cancer shadows rotate clockwise. South of Tropic of Capricorn shadows rotate counterclockwise. At any given time, the Sun is directly above the earth, somewhere between the two tropics. As the Sun spirals between tropics, shadows rotate clockwise if you are North, and counterclockwise if you are South of where the Sun is directly overhead.
http://stick.flat.wtf original version (includes using shadows to find north)(original!) SHADOWS PROVE Sun circling above 😆😁😂 stick.flat.wtfrockets push off air2023-08-04 | Direct custom link to video above http://stick.flat.wtf (In comments you don't need to type http://) North of Tropic of Cancer shadows rotate clockwise. South of Tropic of Capricorn shadows rotate counterclockwise. At any given time, the Sun is directly above the earth, somewhere between the two tropics. As the Sun spirals between tropics, shadows rotate clockwise if you are North, and counterclockwise if you are South of where the Sun is directly overhead.
Original title: SHADOWS PROVE Sun circling above us (complete course everything you need to know about shadows)
Alternate edit, GLOBE CAN'T SHADOW A Deep Dive 😆😁😂 shadows.flat.wtf (starts with analemma, does not include finding north with shadows) http://shadows.flat.wtf youtube.com/watch?v=cdh_XahtDDwflat earth map plus realtime surface temps so damning nullschool had to take it downrockets push off air2023-07-19 | Listen to some bro's discussing the coverup (too funny!) youtu.be/3F9afCVFt_g The temperature data does not make sense on a TIILTED globe! Everyone started referring others to the real time data, as presented on the flat earth map at nullschool. And this was so damning, that nullschool had to take the flat map down!FLAT EARTH MAP REMOVED from real time temp data websiterockets push off air2023-07-18 | Learn more about temperature data and the equator youtu.be/ul3fx0YTpfc?t=2236 it is impossible for the tilted ball to be correct.ECLIPSES PROVE A FLAT EARTHrockets push off air2023-07-18 | " The fact that sun and moon have been seen above the horizon at a lunar eclipse, completely disproves the theory that the earth has got between the two luminaries. " flatearthtextbook.blogspot.com/2016/11/eclipses-of-moon.html Eclipses and dark bodies are a known fact in history youtube.com/watch?v=ET1tOVQ_nL4Glass Dome Over A Circular Map Outdoors Locates Sun 😆😁😂 reality.flat.wtfrockets push off air2023-07-17 | This video mimics reality!
Old title: "Obviously Flat Earth (add Sun & Dome to Gleason Map)"FLAT EARTHrockets push off air2023-06-28 | " The fact that sun and moon have been seen above the horizon at a lunar eclipse, completely disproves the theory that the earth has got between the two luminaries. " flatearthtextbook.blogspot.com/2016/11/eclipses-of-moon.html
http://flat.wtf debunks this nonsensical comment, at this link youtube.com /watch?v=ka0vlArrT2U &lc=Ugz2dFvjBdFJkrqvoAR4AaABAg.9ydrE_EFnO1A08Mk8Laji_
@engineeringtheweirdguy2103 6 days ago (as of Feb. 29th, 2024) @rocketspushoffair you’re repeating the same debunked line. You keep saying “it requires belief that a cracked body can spin like a solid body… and can have trillions of psi tensile strength” no. It doesn’t require that belief. AGAIN, because gravity is pulling it in, much harder than it’s being spun out. So it doesn’t require ANY tensile strength, because, according to the globe model, it’s under COMPRESSION
Put down the script for a second. Your entire argument about the spin being impossible relies utterly on ignoring gravity and pretending it isn’t apart of the globe model. Which is by definition, a strawman fallacy. Because you’re not debunking the globe model, you’re debunking a model you made up, that doesn’t include gravity. Then claiming it’s the globe model. You’ve built a strawman to defeat. Yours is a flawed argument.TOY GLOBE SHADOW TEST PROVES EQUINOX HAPPENS EVERYDAY ON GLOBErockets push off air2022-03-03 | Direct custom link http://line.flat.wtf When you put a stick in the ground on a globe, you can only ever trace a STRAIGHT LINE on a flat surface everywhere the Sun rises & sets. We observe on our flat earth that straight line shadow tracings only occur at equinox. And, when you add up all the straight lines around the circumference of a latitude you get a circle. On days before and after equinox you get a curved shadow tracing, which is not possible on the fake globe. Watch http://stick.flat.wtf for actual shadow tracings and a more complete debunk in 12 minutes.
rockets push off air REPLY TO GLOBE-RIDER:
@Rrrick "Shadows will trace a straight line on a globe if and only if the declination of the sun is 0, i.e. the sun is above the equator, i.e. it is an equinox." No, only straight lines are possible on a globe, everywhere the Sun is observed to rise and set. Your "if and only if" has been debunked. There are an infinite number of places other than what you specified, that straight lines are created on the globe. The video above line.flat.wtf proves it, as does the other example at stick.flat.wtf Denial is all you have. 😁😆🤩🤠🤯🥳🤕🥸MINIMALISTIC DEBUNK MIDNIGHT SUN ON GLOBE only 180° FOV field of view of sky not 360°rockets push off air2022-02-17 | Direct custom link http://zigzag.flat.wtf Filming midnight sun gives 360° field of view but only 180° on fake globe. Circling sun appears to zig zag up and down as it gets close/far. Blocked in Austria, Germany, Switzerland because of northern midnight sun footage (in the second half of the video) from Polish station at 77° N.Santa knows flat earth! CANNOT FILM 24hr SUN on fake globe must compensate for diameter & curvature!rockets push off air2022-02-15 | Direct custom link http://Santa.flat.wtf To see all comments, SORT BY *Newest first* This video puts the globe-rider into a no-win situation, heads the flathead wins, tails the globehead loses! Because, if the sun is close enough to make it appear to rise to high noon and then climb down to set, then my video (above) stands, and the fake globe earth model is broken.
In other words, dear globe-rider, if you accept fake globe earth claims about the reason (curve of earth) we see the sun rise to high noon and then set, you cannot use "the sun is too far away" excuse, to get out of the required camera rotation compensation, because, the sun then is also too far away for earth curve to be the reason we see the sun rise to noon and then set.
Moreover, my video at http://azimuth.flat.wtf proves in autoCAD that sunrise and sunset azimuth angles would be the same everywhere on fake globe earth, because the sun is so far away. The reason is that THE EARTH CURVE BECOMES .0016 DEGREES = ZERO if you lived on a ball 100 million miles away from the sun. Globe-riders, cannot disagree, if they believe in a distant far away sun!
Hence, you can see that earth's curve is eliminated by the great distance of the sun. That is, the great distance of the sun flattens the curve of the earth ball. And that's the end of the globe!SUN NOT 93MIL MILES AWAY sunrise azimuth angle would be 113.5 degrees at all latitudes but it is notrockets push off air2022-02-15 | Direct custom link http://azimuth.flat.wtf The difference from the center of the sun to the center of the earth to the top of the earth is only .0016 degrees. Sun azimuth angle remains the same, 113.42° (which is 90° + the tilt 23.42° EVERYWHERE). Moving along the sunlight's terminator line, (the dimension towards the screen), doesn't change this angle.
The azimuth angle of the sunrise would be the same at all locations if we were on a ball. It isn't... proving the sun is not 93 million miles away.
OBJECTION: "moving along the terminator line CHANGES THE ANGLE TO NORTH"
ANSWER: No, it does not. North is always a right angle to latitude.😆😁😂
COMMENT: Marten Trudeau
"Basic AutoCad is accurate to the fifteenth decimal place, it's a wonderful program. -- Fantastic video, those angles at 93 million miles is amazing AutoCad does figure them with so much accuracy. The heliocentric ball earth solar system is not working on so many levels and it's an intentional lie to lead people away from faith in God and the bible, which is the truth."HUNDREDS OF FAKE ANTARCTICA 24hr SUN VIDEOS 10 years ago Amundsen-Scott cut up to 11 hours every dayrockets push off air2022-02-14 | Direct custom link http://Amundsen.flat.wtf There's no reason for cuts in a 24 hr midnite sun time laps video, unlesss ... you don't have 24 hours of sun.🤣 Sorry, but you don't live on a ball.FAKE McMurdo ANTARCTICA MIDNIGHT SUN vertical LINE edit artifact always above Sun NO RAYS FADES THRUrockets push off air2022-02-12 | Direct custom link http://McMurdo.flat.wtf You never see the Sun, all you see is a smudge! No Sun rays! And the camera doesn't do a full circle pan, they forgot about south! It's so bad! The Sun COMPLETELY DISAPEARS FROM THE SKY!
The way the fake Sun (smudge) fades in and out can be created in Paint by a kid. And the way the Sun takes the glare with it.
In the fake video, the Sun (smudge) disappears/reappears TRHOUGH THE OBJECT. Not around it. No Sun rays!
In the real footage, no part of the tree (with a relative diameter to the Sun the same as the thin pole in the fake video) swallows up the Sun, glare and all, in the same way a kid would be able to reproduce using Paint.😆
And don't forget the lovely editing artifact in the fake video, you know, that vertical guide line that follows the fake sun until it fades out and reappears when the fake sun fades in, and never changes at all throughout 24 hours.REAL SIZE OF AUSTRALIA 3666.96 KM Sydney to Perth as crow flies based on ship log sailing distancesrockets push off air2021-10-23 | Direct custom link http://australia.flat.wtf you don't live on a ball. Sir Robert Ball, in his "Story of the Heavens," page 163, informs the reader that: "The dimensions of the earth are known with a high degree of accuracy."
This writer is recognized as an able exponent of globular hypotheses, and it is generally conceded that what he says may be regarded as correct.
You don't live on a ball! 😂😂😂
What a complete mess the fake cracked pear globe is in! Total disarray, zero accuracy, circumnavigations in the south look like a 3 year old drew the path! HAAHHHAAHAAAAHAHAA!!!!!
Is the Bible From Heaven, Is the Earth a Globe?--Alex Gleason. There is a chapter near the end (chapter 19) that contains ship log data that confirms longitude diverges south of the equator. The book is full of flat earth proof. (Direct custom link http://Gleason.flat.wtf ) vaultedearth.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/is-the-bible-from-heaven-is-earth-a-globe.pdf
The Gleason map is an azimuthal equidistant map. The distances to the only pole on earth are to the north pole correct (that's the claim) and as my video showed, the latitudes need calibration. And you see that the path of the Challenger plotted on a Mercator map (see direct custom link below) or a globe, looks like a 3 year old did it with a crayon! It only looks like a circumnavigation of the south, on the Gleason map, the military "Air Map". I can use the entire route on a Gleason map, to show it looks like a proper circumnavigation, I can do the same with Captain Cook's path, all three trips together look normal on the Gleason map. In every case, and in every emergency landing,they look disfigured on the globe and Mercator, which proves everything.
Also, the FACT remains, that earth is motionless and flat. That is the basis and the starting point of all intelligent inquiry.
Someone (Paulster X) tried to be a smart guy. In his reply he deducts 20% from 7637 recorded nautical miles; when only 17% (12 ÷ 14.4) is justified! this is in addition to GOING WELL ONTO THE LAND OF ANTARCTICA! You can see everything in the photos at his link (below).
"No, it was not a good match. You suggested measuring this with string, so never one to shy away from a challenge, I did. I approximated the route on a Gleason map based on the route map in the link below. I then curved a piece of string around the rhumb line (following the line of latitude) and another along the voyage route. The first measured 12cm, the second 14.4, so the route was around 20% greater than the rhumb line distance. Using your voyage distance of 7637NM and deducting 20% gives us a rhumb line distance of 6109NM. Dividing by 126.5 degrees gives a distance per degree of 48.3NM, or 55.5 statute miles and a latitude circumference of 19,995 statute miles. The expected earth circumference at 36 degrees latitude is 20,169 miles - so my little escapade with a piece of string looks to be accurate within less than 1%. Not bad eh?"
"Here’s the photos and proof: https://photos.app.goo.gl/1pZoA4HmUCB... Do you still think that voyage approximated a rhumb line?" Direct custom short link: http://18111.flat.wtf
Let's use Paulster X's strings! 12 cm divided by 14.4 cm = .833333333 so let's take that percentage of 7637 NM = 6364.1666 NM divide by 126.5 degrees between Cape of Good Hope and Melbourne = 50.3096 NM per degree at 36 degrees S. Circumference = 18,111 NM globe predicts 17,526 NM
Thus, even if we assume a 1,273 NM ERROR longitude diverges south of the equator, case closed.WHY A SPINNING BODY BREAKS ALONG ITS LONGITUDE no cracked body can spin globe earth is a fantasyrockets push off air2021-09-24 | Chapters listed below. Custom link to this video http://split.flat.wtf You don't live on a ball. Only a SOLID BODY can spin like a top, and no material can handle spinning over 1000 mph (like fake CRACKED GLOBE earth does at equator). The non-working broken globe model, is just a REIFICATION FANTASY, completely imaginary where not a single claim is backed up by science or demonstration or observation (reification is a formal fallacy).
Three pages from three engineering text books (custom links to Blogger): http://spin1.flat.wtf ; http://spin2.flat.wtf ; http://spin3.flat.wtf
Custom links to three YouTube videos I did on this topic (plus two more in end screen): http://split1.flat.wtf ; http://split2.flat.wtf ; http://split3.flat.wtf
"And that's the end of the globe!"
A spinning globe is a stack of flywheels, which reduces to a single ring.
00:00 Warm up 06:38 Start, apple, onion, Styrofoam ball 17:30 Styrofoam rings; heavy force zone 27:43 Can break along any longitude (plus Paulster X and his cockamamie conflation) 31:10 "To cut it short and simply put" breaking depends on surface speed, radius cancels out 36:05 Everything reduces to what happens to a single ring 37:00 Closing comments and bonus info (can't see Sun while on equator looking south)SPLITTING A SPHERE BY SPINNING TOO FAST talk 3 of 3 plus 3 stupid things about gravity EARTH IS FLATrockets push off air2021-05-18 | Direct custom link to video http://slpit3.flat.wtf You don't live on a ball!HOW CENTRIFUGAL TENSION SPLITS A SPHERE globe hoax motionless flat earthrockets push off air2021-05-06 | http://split2.flat.wtf direct custom link to this video, part two of a three video series. You don't live on a tilted cracked spinning water covered ball. Space is FAKE!WHY A SPINNING SPHERE SPLITS basic engineering proves motionless flat earthrockets push off air2021-05-03 | http://findumonde.flat.wtf direct custom link to this video or http://split1.flat.wtf as part one of a three video series. http://spin2.flat.wtf direct custom link to Blogger, see the pages and diagrams from an engineering textbook. You don't live on a ball! Space is fake!LONGITUDE DIVERGES SOUTH OF EQUATOR actual sailing distances prove flat earth and a smaller equatorrockets push off air2021-02-16 | Direct custom link http://longitude.flat.wtf And that's the end of the globe! Normally you would want to add distance to bring the total up to the rumb line (we are trying to find a distance to part of a circle, and ships usually try to go directly from one place to the other) but in this case no extra mileage was needed because of the route itself (it dips south): "December 1873 to February 1874 was spent sailing on a roughly south-eastern track from the Cape of Good Hope to the parallel of 60 degrees south. The islands visited during this period were the Prince Edward Islands, the Crozet Islands, the Kerguelen Islands, and Heard Island. February 1874 was spent travelling south and then generally eastwards in the vicinity of the Antarctic Circle, with sightings of icebergs, pack ice and whales. The route then took the ship north-eastward and away from the ice regions in March 1874, with the expedition reaching Melbourne in Australia later that month."--Try drawing this on the Gleason map, put a length of string on it, then see how nicely the string fits on the curve of 36 degrees south latitude between Cape of Good Hope and Melbourne.
Even if you reduce the distance to 7000 nautical miles (from 7637), you still get 23,000 miles in circumference at 36 degrees, while on the fake globe you get 20,000 miles. And that's the end of the globe! http://www.easysurf.cc/circle.htm#cetol1
"From the same work, we find the distance from Sydney to Wellington (NZ) to be 1,432 miles. The middle latitude is 37½°, and the difference of longitude 23° 36', which gives as the distance round the world at latitude 37½° south, 25,500 statute miles! This distance is again greater than the greatest distance round the 'globe' is said to be and many thousands of miles greater than could be the case on a globe." [Which gives 60.75 nautical miles per degree at 37½° south latitude.]
Is the Bible From Heaven, Is the Earth a Globe?--Alex Gleason. There is a chapter near the end (chapter 19) that contains ship log data that confirms longitude diverges south of the equator. The book is full of flat earth proof. (Direct custom link http://Gleason.flat.wtf ) vaultedearth.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/is-the-bible-from-heaven-is-earth-a-globe.pdf
MUSIC: Matteo Tura - LARSEN youtu.be/bNCjDNjoSJUYOU DO NOT LIVE ON A BALL unless refraction always same and EXACTLY MATCHES CURVE updated editionrockets push off air2021-02-09 | Custom direct link http://RockLake.flat.wtf YOU DO NOT LIVE ON A BALL unless refraction same everywhere everyday all day and EXACTLY compensates for curve. With the camera starting at 12 inches above the frozen lake (17 inches of ice) then dropped to 8 inches and 4 inches, and the furthest light 8 miles away and the closest 4 miles away, a total of 4 lights 1 mile apart and 12 inches above the ice, there is no curve. Only some distortion. Same result on a sunny warm day at Bedford, where Dr. Samuel Rowbotham conducted his two famous experiments http://Rowbotham.flat.wtfAnd a video that will make you laugh so hard you might die http://REFRACTION.flat.wtf
Sound track: Do You Hear What I Hear #LIGHTtheWORLD | The Five Strings youtu.be/dZpzv_IDOP8REFRACTION I laughed so hard I cried Risitas super funny videorockets push off air2021-02-08 | Custom direct link http://refraction.flat.wtf Enjoy!TRAJECTORY CALCULATORS FLAT EARTH BASED Dr Samuel Rowbotham demonstrates whyrockets push off air2021-02-04 | Custom direct link to this video http://Rowbotham.flat.wtf (use Robotham.flat.wtf in comments on YouTube and it automatically hyperlinks). In a similar experiment at http://RockLake.flat.wtf we saw 4 lights all in a row, just like the flags. This was over a frozen lake and over a greater distance, the furthest light being 8 miles away. Each other light 1 mile closer to the camera. The lights and camera were 12 inches off the ground. The lights remained visible at three different camera heights: at 12 inches, 8 inches, and 4 inches off the ground. In both cases Globeheads need to show that "refraction" lifted up each flag, and each light (at all 3 camera elevations) THE EXACT AMOUNT that they were hidden by the curve. Impossible, since refraction is not the same over a frozen lake vs a nice day at Bedford. At no point did the lights appear to move up and down. There was some atmospheric distortion.
rockets push off air 3 minutes ago @Paulster X At no point did the lights appear to move up and down. There was some atmospheric distortion. The curve is the same at Bedford and Rock Lake. But the weather conditions were vastly different, and so was the refraction. But MIRACULOUSLY in both cases, the flags and the lights were lifted up the EXACT AMOUNT they were hiden by the curve! Different refraction, same distances. CLOSE YOUR CHANNELARTIFICIAL HARD AND SOFT SUNLIGHT SET UP IN PHOTOGRAPHY directly mimics a small sun under a dome skyrockets push off air2021-01-29 | This video custom link http://daylight.flat.wtf Enjoy! *daylight.flat.wtf* auto-hyperlinks in YT comments. Part 2 has been removed, now a separate video, custom link http://RockLake.flat.wtfGIANT SUN WOULD FILL ENTIRE SKY if it was a light heliocentric cult defines it as a basketballrockets push off air2021-01-24 | Custom direct link http://basketball.flat.wtf Debunks the To Scale channel. Get two people to hold a candle in the dark, really dark like fake space, and have one stand 10 feet from you, the other 20 feet. Snap a photo, you should see 2 lights the same size! And that's the end of the globe!
From "Music and Morals," by H. R, Haweiss, I extract the following:
"The Antwerp spire is 403 feet high from the foot of the tower; Strasburg measures 468 feet from the level of the sea, but less than 403 feet from the level of the plain. By the clear morning light, from the steeple at Notre Dame at Antwerp, the panorama can hardly be surpassed; 126 steeples may be counted, far and near. Facing northward the Scheldt winds away until it loses itself in a white line, which is none other than the North Sea. By the aid of a telescope ships can be distinguished out on the horizon, and the captains declare they can see the lofty spire at ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILES distant; Middelburg at 75 miles, Fleesing 65 miles, are also visible from the steeple; looking towards Holland, we can distinguish Breda and Walladue, each about 54 miles off."
The above spire would be out of sight A MILE BELOW THE HORIZON, at a distance of 150 miles, and as no telescope can pierce a segment of water, the conclusion is that water is level.
The Earth Review of July, 1894, says: "The Captain of the s.s. Milo, referring to the question as to how far a powerful light can be seen, says: 'The other day, when off Skagen, the rays from Hantsholmen lighthouse were distinctly visible, though the light was fully seventy-two miles away.' Mr. B. wrote and asked how the light could be seen unless the lighthouse was 3,500 feet above sea-level? This is the official reply he received: Editorial Department, Tit-Bits, Dec. 21, 1892. The paragraph you refer to was sent me by the Captain of the s.s. Milo, and he vouched for its accuracy. Under these circumstances I cannot enter into a discussion as to the possibility of his being able to see it or not. P.S.—Mr. B. allowed that the reported observation was made from a mast-head 100 feet above sea-level."
But in determining by that principle our scientists have neglected to consider one of the most important points; they forget that the law which makes objects apparently diminishing in proportion to their distance from the observer does not affect luminous bodies; the brighter the light of the body the longer its bulk will remain unchanged in our sight, whereas an object but faintly lighted becomes invisible, as I have said, at a distance which exceeds its diameter 5,000 times. If the said law extended to luminous bodies, then a flame one inch wide could not be seen at the distance of 225 yards, whereas we know from experiment that the size of its apparent bulk does not change even when the candle is carried to a distance of several thousand yards. As the sunlight is extremely bright, the bulk of the sun must therefore seem unchangeable...
EXCELLENT TEST: Ryan Q Vincent 21 minutes ago @paolo salucci Now you are being silly with your 'cannon test!! Here is a possible real test... imagine a line of 6 ft florescent lights end to end for 600 ft at the end of a long runway or flat area. Now, take a camera and start taking photos as you start close to them then back away. How far do you need to be to make the angular size the same as the sun? Does the scaled distance match what you believe about the sun?
Imagine not just one row of lights but many hundreds of vertically as well. What do you think you will find?
Go check the size of lighthouse lamp areas and how far they can be seen away? Spot the issues with your reasoning yet?GIANT DISTANT SUN ALCHEMIST IDEA who were they why did they do itrockets push off air2021-01-21 | The were not engineers, not practical scientists or actual scientists. Fake globe earth is covered by cracked basalt crust under the oceans. Cracked basalt cannot spin, no cracked body can spin. No material can spin like a top over 1000 mph (like fake globe earth at the equator) w/o exploding way before that. BASIC ENGINEERING http://spin1.flat.wtf [If custom links scare you, click the Blogger icon on the about page of my channel. Either way, you go directly to a secure page on Blogger.PHOTOS WITH HORIZON & SUN ABOVE TREES prove flat earth PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE on a ball (Rory Cooper)rockets push off air2021-01-21 | Direct custom link http://chips.flat.wtf There is no debunking REALITY. You live on a stationary flat earth, with the Sun, Moon, and Stars above you. Just the way you see it.ERATOSTHENES PROVED A SMALL LOCAL SUN over a flat motionless earth Carl Sagan lies exposedrockets push off air2021-01-17 | The direct custom link is http://range.flat.wtf This video shows how the data obtained by Eratosthenes, when properly used, actually proves a small local Sun over a flat earth. His false interpretation of the data is a result of his assumptions of a spinning globe, and parallel light from a massive distant Sun.
A flat table was turned into a globe, in a perfect scientific experiment http://lens.flat.wtf (direct link to YouTube video) when DEBUNKED http://spin1.flat.wtf unnatural assumptions were used. The independent variable was the lens, and the dependent variable was the angle of deception (Eratosthenes' 7.2 degree angle, that he was fooled by for not considering the effects of atmospheric lensing)
The video at http://lens.flat.wtf proves that the atmosphere acting as a lens causes the range of Sun heights, from a few to several thousand nautical miles. The range itself proves the Sun is close. The values at the extremities are discarded since they are most prone to error. This leaves 2700 nautical as the BEST estimate of the height of the sun. SMALL LOCAL SUN
BASIC ENGINEERING http://spin1.flat.wtf *No cracked material can spin, and no solid material can spin over 1000 mph w/o exploding way before that.*
My challenge for Globeheads: WITHOUT ANY WILD ASSUMPTIONS (DEBUNKED AT http://spin1.flat.wtf ) show me how the range of heights proves a massive distant sun, parallel light, and a 1000 mph spinning cracked basalt covered ball. When it clearly proves a small local Sun moving over a flat motionless earth, from which the data was derived http://lens.flat.wtf
SCIENCE DOES NOT REQUIRE WILD UNNATURAL ASSUMPTIONS: such as a cracked basalt covered behemoth globe spins like a top over 1000 mph. *Show us that cracked basalt can do this.* Prove cracked basalt can contain trillions of psi of tension (caused by the behemoth globe spinning over 1000 mph see http://spin1.flat.wtf for calculations and pages from engineering textbooks), when it cannot even contain 1 psi. *No cracked material can spin, and no solid material can spin over 1000 mph w/o exploding well before that speed.* FAKE GLOBE.
http://spin1.flat.wtf goes directly to Blogger. You can also click the Blogger icon on the about page of my channel.
COPY INTO YOUTUBE COMMENTS (WILL INSTANTLY BECOME HYPERLINKS):
lens.flat.wtf and for video descriptions use http://lens.flat.wtf
*ERATOSTHENES DEBUNKED FLAT EARTH no he forgot atmosphere is a lens* lens.flat.wtf
range.flat.wtf and for video descriptions use http://range.flat.wtf
*ERATOSTHENES PROVED A SMALL LOCAL SUN over a flat motionless earth Carl Sagan lies exposed* range.flat.wtf
rockets push off air 37 minutes ago @Andrew Holdaway (Eratosthenes) proved a small local sun over a motionless flat earth, just get rid of the assumptions of a cracked basalt behemoth spinning 1000 mph, parallel light and distant sun. The data requires no assumptions to be properly interpreted. The range proves a small close sun. The values at the extremities are discarded since they are most prone to error. This leaves 2700 nautical as the BEST estimate of the height of the sun. The atmosphere is the reason we don't have thee exact height http://lens.flat.wtfWHY DO THINGS DROP relative density gravity hoax pink panther #SaveBobrockets push off air2021-01-08 | The direct custom link to this video is http://drop.flat.wtf In a letter to Dr. Richard Bentley on Feb 25th, 1692; Isaac Newton says: "Tis inconceivable that inanimate brute matter should, without mediation of something else which is not material, operate upon and affect other matter without mutual contact, as it must be if gravitation, in the sense of Epicurus, be essential and inherent in it. And this is one reason why I desired you WOULD NOT ASCRIBE INNATE GRAVITY TO ME. That gravity should be innate, and essential to matter, so that one body may act upon another at a distance through a vacuum, without the mediation of anything else, by and through which their action and force may be conveyed from one to another, is to me SO GREAT AN ABSURDITY that I believe no man who has in philosophical matters a competent faculty of thinking can ever fall into it. Gravity must be caused by an agent acting constantly according to certain laws, but whether this agent be material or immaterial I have left to the consideration of my readers." Scheurer, PB. Debrock, G. Newton's Scientific and Philosophical Legacy, 1988, p. 52
You can listen for 5 MINUTES a nice discussion that debunks even more lies about Newton, and what he said about gravity.FIREARMS INSTRUCTOR DEBUNKS CORIOLIS motionless flat earthrockets push off air2021-01-06 | Direct custom link http://coriolis.flat.wtf (omit the http in comments, just type coriolis.flat.wtf and YouTube automatically hyperlinks it) Also see http://spin1.flat.wtf no way earth is spinning. Federal Firearms Instructor Edward Hendrie’s book The Greatest Lie On Earth Proof That Our World Is Not A Moving GlobeSNIPER 20K CORIOLIS BET CHALLENGE earth is flat and motionlessrockets push off air2021-01-06 | Direct custom link http://sniper.flat.wtf (omit the http in comments, just type sniper.flat.wtf and YouTube automatically hyperlinks it) See also http://coriolis.flat.wtf