Debunking the Kalam Cosmological Argument Religion Debate 2013-08-31 | Philosophy professor Peter Millican responds to William Lane Craig's cosmological argument for God.If you are interested in a more thorough refutation of this argument, I highly recommend this "Countering the Kalam" playlist: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6M9lJ0vrA7E17ejxJNyPxRM7Zki-nS6GAlso see: Oh, What a Tangled Web! - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rSAo6IpiFU&feature=share&list=PL33ABD27539B516A9The Kalam Cosmological Fallacy: A Brief History of the Failures of Intuition - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUYjnL2PqUgI "Kalam" Like I See 'Em.. - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aD9MtIma5YUDebunking the Kalam (scientific errors) - youtube.com/watch?v=baZUCc5m8sEA written refutation of Kalam: http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=KalamThe full William Lane Craig vs. Peter Millican debate can be seen here: youtube.com/watch?v=9JVRy7bR7zICopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Street Epistemology - A Turning Point for Atheism Religion Debate 2018-09-01 | Anthony Magnabosco is a worldwide promoter and practitioner of Street Epistemology, which is a conversational method for respectfully challenging claims by asking probing questions to uncover the reliability of one's belief formation process.He has appeared on The Thinking Atheist, The Atheist Experience, The David Pakman Show, Cognitive Dissonance, The Friendly Atheist Podcast and blog, as well as several other podcasts and shows. Anthony has inspected hundreds of people’s beliefs using this approach, frequently uploads videos of those discussions to his YouTube channel, and has given several talks, interviews and workshops on the subject. Be prepared to question your own conclusions on how to effectively engage with a God believer or anyone else who happens to make a claim!Learn more at: streetepistemology.comHis channel: youtube.com/user/magnabosco210A Manual for Creating Atheists - amazon.com/Manual-Creating-Atheists-Peter-Boghossian/dp/1939578094AMERICAN ATHEISTS is a national 501(c)(3) organization that defends civil rights for atheists, freethinkers, and other nonbelievers; works for the total separation of religion and government; and addresses issues of First Amendment public policy. Follow our updates on Twitter and Facebook.Official Website: atheists.orgTwitter: twitter.com/AmericanAtheistFacebook: facebook.com/AmericanAtheists
Sam Harris - Choosing A Religion Religion Debate 2017-12-16 | Part of the Sam Harris playlist by MorphingReality: youtube.com/user/TheSkatersunitedCopyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Science & Certainty (Sam Harris) Religion Debate 2017-12-02 | Created by MorphingReality. Check out his channel for more excellent videos! youtube.com/user/TheSkatersunited/videos?sort=dd&flow=grid&view=0Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
The Case Against the Resurrection (Keith Parsons) Religion Debate 2017-04-15 | The opening statement from former pastor Keith Parsons in his debate against William Lane Craig. For more videos like this, check out the Case Against the Resurrection playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf113iNh-64a8_1bdkrX7kHqPa88_hjfRThe full debate is available here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxO0u39zeycIf you have a torrent program, here is a large collection of great god debates: http://tinyurl.com/jwenufvWhy I am Not a Christian, by Keith Parsons: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/keith_parsons/whynotchristian.htmlGod's Killings in the Bible: http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible.htmlDeath toll - God vs Satan: http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2006/08/who-has-killed-more-satan-or-god.htmlCruelty in the bible - http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/cruelty/long.htmlAtrocities in the bible - http://www.thethinkingatheist.com/bible_atrocities.htmlAbsurdities in the bible - http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/abs/long.htmRape in the bible - http://www.evilbible.com/Rape.htmMurder in the bible - http://www.evilbible.com/Murder.htmSlavery in the bible - http://www.evilbible.com/Slavery.htmContradictions in the bible - http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/by_name.htmlA few more contradicitons - http://www.evilbible.com/Biblical%20Contradictions.htmFailed prophecies in the bible - http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/proph/long.htmlMore failed prophecies - http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Failed_biblical_propheciesMore - http://www.goatstar.org/failed-propheciesHere are a few facts that every Christian should know about their bible. Some facts about the New Testament:All 4 canonical gospels are written by anonymous Greek-speaking Christians living 40-75 years after the death of Jesus, not by eye-witnesses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible#Gospels_and_Actshttp://unveiling-christianity.org/2009/01/19/the-anonymous-four-gospelshttp://www.rationalresponders.com/the_gospels_are_anonymous_works_and_none_are_eyewitness_accountshttp://www.twopaths.com/jintro.htmWe have no original copies of any book in the New Testament, and most of the copies we have come from many centuries after the originals were lost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_manuscript#New_Testament_manuscriptsThe new testament contains many contradictions: http://www.errancy.com/ratings/overall-ratingshttp://www.infidels.org/library/modern/paul_carlson/nt_contradictions.htmland historical errors: http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/historical_errors_in_the_gospels-3.htmThe new testament may contain as many as 11 forgeries, letters that were written in the name of someone other than the person who actually wrote them (The term "pseudepigraphy" is often used instead of "forgery", but the meaning is identical):http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/02/06/968376/bible-writers-intended-to-deceive.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Pauline_epistles#Disputed_epistleshttp://www.amazon.com/Forged-Writing-God-Why-Bibles-Authors/dp/B006QS02F8/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0Here is an excellent lecture where NT Scholar Bart D. Ehrman discusses some of the scribal alterations and additions that were made to the New Testament as it was copied and recopied over the centuries: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mpHpLrJVHYSome problems with the resurrection accounts of Jesus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCdJT8avbpo
Is the New Testament Reliable? Religion Debate 2017-04-06 | Dr. Bart Ehrman debated Craig Evans on March 31, 2010 over the reliability of the New Testament. Here are a few select excerpts from the debate containing information that every Christian should know about their bible. Some facts about the New Testament:All 4 canonical gospels are written by anonymous Greek-speaking Christians living 40-75 years after the death of Jesus, not by eye-witnesses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible#Gospels_and_Actshttp://unveiling-christianity.org/2009/01/19/the-anonymous-four-gospelshttp://www.rationalresponders.com/the_gospels_are_anonymous_works_and_none_are_eyewitness_accountshttp://www.twopaths.com/jintro.htmWe have no original copies of any book in the New Testament, and most of the copies we have come from many centuries after the originals were lost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_manuscript#New_Testament_manuscriptsThe new testament contains many contradictions: http://www.errancy.com/ratings/overall-ratingshttp://www.infidels.org/library/modern/paul_carlson/nt_contradictions.htmland historical errors: http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/historical_errors_in_the_gospels-3.htmThe new testament may contain as many as 11 forgeries, letters that were written in the name of someone other than the person who actually wrote them (The term "pseudepigraphy" is often used instead of "forgery", but the meaning is identical):http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/02/06/968376/bible-writers-intended-to-deceive.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Pauline_epistles#Disputed_epistleshttp://www.amazon.com/Forged-Writing-God-Why-Bibles-Authors/dp/B006QS02F8/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0Here is an excellent lecture where Ehrman discusses some of the scribal alterations and additions that were made to the New Testament as it was copied and recopied over the centuries: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0mpHpLrJVHYSome problems with the resurrection accounts of Jesus: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCdJT8avbpoBiblical Criticism: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_criticismThe full Ehrman vs. Evans debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2BNwZk6Wi4 Bart Ehrman's books:http://www.amazon.com/Bart-D.-Ehrman/e/B001I9RR7G/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1Thanks to Fibbs1701 for helping edit these clips together. He has many excellent religion-related videos on his channel. Please check them out and consider subscribing! http://www.youtube.com/user/Fibbs1701
Those 7 Times Matt Dillahunty Terminated Religion Religion Debate 2017-03-11 | Thanks to ScienceNet for the original upload. Subscribe to his channel for more great videos! youtube.com/channel/UCLbyMUSR3-V6D3tXU4i4uugLike Us on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/WFLAtheism & http://www.facebook.com/WeLoveAtheismCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Christopher Hitchens - Theocracy Religion Debate 2017-02-28 | Hitchens playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6C79437EA36D0FE5This video was created by MorphingReality. Check out his channel for more great videos! youtube.com/user/TheSkatersunited/videos
Religion Meets Culture - Christopher Hitchens Religion Debate 2017-02-16 | Hitchens playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6C79437EA36D0FE5This video was created by MorphingReality. Check out his channel for more great videos! youtube.com/user/TheSkatersunited/videos
7 Savage Truths About Religion Religion Debate 2017-02-15 | Reuploaded with permission. For more excellent videos like this, check out youtube.com/user/jerrybber/videosCopyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Is Faith Enough? Religion Debate 2016-08-12 | This two minute video asks if faith is enough to maintain a god belief. Want to Learn More About Street Epistemology? Check out these resources:Book: 'A Manual for Creating Atheists' http://tinyurl.com/SE-PB-AMFCA Street Epistemology Website: streetepistemology.com/resourcesThe free Atheos App for Iphone or Android (excellent SE tutorials): http://www.atheos-app.comPlaylist of Street Epistemology:http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-ST-EPSPlaylist of My Top Five:http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-TOP5Playlist of SE Breakdown Tutorials:http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-BD-TUTORIALSPlaylist of Interviews & Presentations:http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-ST-TALKSPlaylist of Ward ("It's [faith] a gift!"):http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-WARDPlaylist of Austin ("the faith is all in or all out"):http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-AUSTINDiscussion with Aisha ("But I have faith"):youtu.be/S3_rqPW4HxcDiscussion with Johnny ("I have faith in that book"):youtu.be/zXxKvRcqFjUDiscussion with Elissa (Jehovah's Witness):youtu.be/LZpfLjKebM4Discussion with Nadia ("three different levels of faith"):youtu.be/BT7fa6J1pVgPlaylist of Maheep ("blind confidence"):http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-MAHEEPDiscussion with Antoni ("person to person to person"):youtu.be/F5EpfExorQQPlaylist of Kayla ("I'm not really quite sure what more there is"):http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-KAYLAPlaylist of All Talks that Appeared in this Video:http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-IFESpecial thanks to Socrates Jones for narrating. Please visit their YouTube Channel: http://tinyurl.com/kotoszvReuploaded with permission of Anthony Magnabosco. Be sure to subscribe to his channel here: youtube.com/channel/UCocP40a_UvRkUAPLD5ezLIQTwitter: twitter.com/magnaboscoFacebook: facebook.com/magnabosco210
Talking People Out of Faith - A One Minute Intro Religion Debate 2016-08-05 | Get an introduction to Street Epistemology in one minute. Want to Learn More About Street Epistemology? Check out these resources:Book: 'A Manual for Creating Atheists' http://tinyurl.com/SE-PB-AMFCA The free Atheos App for Iphone or Android has excellent SE tutorials: http://www.atheos-app.comMore resources: streetepistemology.com/resourcesPlaylist of My Top Five:http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-TOP5Playlist of Kiana (Karma drop 82% to 53%):http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-KIANAPlaylist of Hannah (Jesus drop 90% to 50%):http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-HANNAHDiscussion with Jamil (God drop 100% to 60%):http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-JAMILPlaylist of All Talks that Appeared in this Video:http://tinyurl.com/PL-AM-SE-WISEReuploaded with permission of Anthony Magnabosco. Twitter: twitter.com/magnaboscoFacebook: facebook.com/magnabosco210Youtube: youtube.com/channel/UCocP40a_UvRkUAPLD5ezLIQ
The Case Against the Resurrection (Bart D. Ehrman) Religion Debate 2016-03-26 | Happy Easter! ;) Check out the full Case Against the Resurrection playlist here: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf113iNh-64a8_1bdkrX7kHqPa88_hjfRNew Testament scholar Bart Ehrman lays out the problems with taking the resurrection stories seriously from a historical perspective. If you are interested in a list of contradictions in the resurrection accounts, check out the links below: http://www.religionfacts.com/christianity/charts/resurrection_accounts.htmhttp://atheism.about.com/od/gospelcontradictions/p/Resurrection.htmhttp://errancy.org/tomb.htmlA refutation of the common "minimal facts" approach to defending the resurrection: adversusapologetica.wordpress.com/2013/06/29/knocking-out-the-pillars-of-the-minimal-facts-apologeticSome additional facts about the New Testament that should cast doubt on it's reliability:All 4 canonical gospels are written by anonymous Greek-speaking Christians living 40-70 years after the death of Jesus, not by eye-witnesses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Bible#Gospels_and_Actshttp://www.christianbiblereference.org/jintro.htmhttp://www.rationalresponders.com/the_gospels_are_anonymous_works_and_none_are_eyewitness_accountsWe have no original copies of any book in the New Testament, and most of the copies we have come from many centuries after the originals were lost: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biblical_manuscript#New_Testament_manuscriptsThe new testament contains many contradictions: http://www.errancy.com/ratings/overall-ratingshttp://www.infidels.org/library/modern/paul_carlson/nt_contradictions.htmlhttp://www.skeptically.org/bible/id6.htmland historical errors: http://www.answering-christianity.com/abdullah_smith/historical_errors_in_the_gospels-3.htmThe new testament may contain as many as 11 forgeries, letters that were written in the name of someone other than the person who actually wrote them (The term "pseudepigraphy" is often used instead of "forgery", but the meaning is identical):http://www.newsobserver.com/2011/02/06/968376/bible-writers-intended-to-deceive.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_Pauline_epistles#Disputed_epistleshttp://www.amazon.com/Forged-Writing-God-Why-Bibles-Authors/dp/B006QS02F8/ref=tmm_hrd_title_0Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
The Indelible Stamp of our Lowly Origins Religion Debate 2016-02-21 | "We must acknowledge, that man with all his noble qualities, with sympathy which feels for the most debased, with benevolence which extends not only to other men but to the humblest living creature, with his god-like intellect which has penetrated into the movements and constitution of the solar system - with all these exalted powers - Man still bears in his bodily frame the indelible stamp of his lowly origin." - Charles Darwin, The Descent of ManCreated by Uppruni Tegundanna. Check out his channel for more amazing videos! http://www.youtube.com/user/UppruniTegundanna/videos?sort=p&view=0Wikipedia page on Evolution: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EvolutionEvidence of Common Descent: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evidence_of_common_descentHuman Chromosome #2: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chromosome_2_(human)#EvolutionThe Collapse of Intelligent Design (Ken Miller Lecture): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ohd5uqzlwsUFacts of Evolution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEP7Z55Z6nMMechanisms of Evolution: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ja6vDo2jOScFrequently asked questions about evolution: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/library/faq/index.htmlEvolution: Fact and Theory: http://www.actionbioscience.org/evolution/lenski.html15 evolutionary gems: http://www.nature.com/nature/newspdf/evolutiongems.pdfEvolution is a scientific fact: http://www.nationalacademies.org/evolution/TheoryOrFact.htmlHuman Evolution: http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidenceScientific evidence against a young earth: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Evidence_against_a_recent_creationMore Evolution Resources: http://www.nationalacademies.org/evolution/WebResources.htmlClips:Planet Earth PBS NOVA Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial Human Animal Darwin's Dangerous Idea Charles Darwin and the Tree of Life Life of MammalsNational Geographic - Ape GeniusYann Arthus Bertrand - Home TEDTalks: Susan Savage-Rumbaugh: Apes that write, start fires and play Pac-Man What Darwin Didn't Know Music: IBM 1401 Processing Unit - Jóhann Jóhannsson (www.johannjohannsson.com)Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Refuting Cosmological Arguments for God (AnticitizenX mirror) Religion Debate 2016-01-30 | Part of AnticitizenX's great "Philosophical Failures of Christian Apologetics" series: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL3IOkNR8_9gpQa5teO1xQANB-3MiY17ukFor more refutations of the Kalam argument, you can check out the videos below:Dr. Peter Milican on Kalam: youtube.com/watch?v=oMwp9Wd-QmEDemolishing the Kalam Argument (a comprehensive series from CounterApologist): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KvZGauAmo8 TheoreticalBS vs William Lane Craig: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCCF97F3B92DF3CB8For a detailed written refutation, check out: http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=KalamMusical Credit:"Origins" by Mike "Skitch" Schiciano.This guy is amazing! Show him some love and check out his music.Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/skitchstudio/o...Bandcamp ($1.00): http://skitch.bandcamp.com/track/origins
Jesus Christ: Madman or Something Worse? Religion Debate 2016-01-30 | Madman or Something Worse is a short film that critically examines the ethics of Jesus of Nazareth. Produced by Peter Brietbart, with animations by Many Artists Who Do One Thing.http://www.madmanorsomethingworse.comAll credit goes to the following people:Writer / Production / Direction: Peter BrietbartAnimation / Illustration / Typography: Many Artists Who Do One Thing http://www.mawdot.co.ukEditor / Production: Keita LynchOriginal Score: Adam FelmanCamera Operators: Marco De La Vega, Katie BirksSound Engineer: Dave GambleModels:Hannah BaconSol Bailey BarkerDino KazamiaPatrick CollingwoodTom MurphyLucy WinwardPeter BrietbartMihai BadicCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Why the God Hypothesis is Obsolete Religion Debate 2016-01-23 | This is an intro to a great series of videos on the psychology of belief by Valerie Tarico. I highly recommend checking out the other videos she has done here: youtube.com/user/TrustingDoubt/videos?flow=grid&view=0 Also be sure to check out the Psychology of Belief series by AnticitizenX: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL59FDC1E7AB317957&feature=mh_lolzCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Let There Be Hitch Religion Debate 2016-01-16 | A tribute to the late Christopher Hitchens. Check out the Hitchens playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PL6C79437EA36D0FE5Thanks Atheism-Is-Unstoppable for the original upload: youtube.com/channel/UCg6MuFVugHwWCp1YDQDAy1wCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Lawrence Krauss on Science vs. Religion Religion Debate 2016-01-02 | Responding to a question from a Muslim, Dr. Krauss lays out the difference between the scientific and religious mindset. Full Debate: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3YKrLab0IWgCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
THE FEYNMAN SERIES - Curiosity Religion Debate 2016-01-01 | The Feynman Series is a side project of The Sagan Series, an educational project working in the hopes of promoting scientific literacy in the general population. If you enjoyed this video, I highly recommend checking out the rest here: youtube.com/user/damewse/videos Created by @ReidGower http://twitter.com/reidgowerCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.Part 1: BEAUTY - youtube.com/watch?v=cRmbwczTC6ECREDITSMUSIC : Ludovico Einaudi - Primavera - itunes.apple.com/us/artist/ludovico-einaudi/id7420827NARRATION: Richard Feynman - Take The World From Another Point Of ViewBBC The Great Rift - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00mfldkKoyaanisqatsi - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0085809Microcosmos - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117040BBC Life - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life_(BB...)Chronos - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0088919BBC Planet Earth - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Earth_%28TV_series%29BBC The Secret Life of Chaos - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pv1c3Wonders of the Universe - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonders_of_the_UniverseTrinity and Beyond - http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0114728
A Manual for Creating Atheists (Peter Boghossian) Religion Debate 2015-12-26 | A presentation from Dr. Peter Boghossian at Imagine No Religion 3 conference.For examples of these techniques in action, see: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLh10RgQgGuM-tnT7fKwgF4Dt57oh_yL5rYou can also check out Boghossian's book "A Manual for Creating Atheists": http://tinyurl.com/mlpdpbfThanks to FloatingJetsam for the original upload: http://www.youtube.com/user/FloatingJetsam
THE SAGAN SERIES - Life Looks for Life Religion Debate 2015-12-25 | The Sagan Series is an educational project working in the hopes of promoting scientific literacy in the general population. Check out the full series here: http://www.youtube.com/user/damewseCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.Created by Reid Gower.CREDITS (Used with permission wherever possible)Thomas Newman - Any Other Name - itunes.apple.com/gb/album/american-beauty-original-motion/id17000291Carl Sagan - The Pale Blue Dot - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pale_Blue_DotBBC Wonders of the Solar System - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wonders_of_the_Solar_SystemWhen We Left Earth - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_We_Left_Earth:_The_NASA_MissionsVimeo "Timescapes Timelapse: Mountain Light" by Tom Lowe - vimeo.com/6686768Microcosmos - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicrocosmosBBC Planet Earth - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planet_Earth_%28TV_series%29Vimeo "Low/Available light test for Canon 7D" by Jim Forrest - http://www.vimeo.com/10438271NASA - http://www.youtube.com/user/NASAtelevisionNational Geographic - Inside the Milky Way - http://shop.nationalgeographic.com/ngs/product/dvds/national-geographic-channel-dvds/space/inside-the-milky-way-blu-ray-discBBC The Secret Life of Chaos - http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pv1c3Baraka -http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baraka_%28film%29Vimeo "Time-Lapse Reel 2" by Spencer Black - http://www.blackvisual.comYouTube "Nuclear Weapon Test Atomic Nuke Bomb Explosion" by newworldterror - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlLIxndhDfMHubble IMAX 3D - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hubble_3D
Christianity Refutes Itself (ProfMTH mirror) Religion Debate 2015-12-24 | Christianity fails to fulfill the condition that John 17 has Jesus saying would communicate to the world that he had been sent by God. Other examples of Christianity refuting itself: Jesus makes predictions that don't come true, which, according to Deuteronomy 18:22, means that Jesus is a false prophet. See "Jesus Was Wrong & Should Be Ignored": http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HW1Es5983qQList of Christian denominations: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_denominationsThanks to ProfMTH for making this video. Check out his channel for more great videos: youtube.com/user/ProfMTH/videos?view=0&flow=grid&sort=pMusic: "Thank You, Jesus!" (The Holmes Brothers)Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Christian vs. Muslim (Darkmatter2525 mirror) Religion Debate 2015-11-28 | Despite being "enemies", they share some interesting similarities..Thanks to DM2525 for the original upload. Check out his channel for more great videos! youtube.com/user/DarkMatter2525
Christian Justice Religion Debate 2015-11-08 | What would the American Justice System be like if we implemented New Testament rules?Created and reuploaded with permission of Darkmatter2525. Check out his channel for more great videos! http://www.youtube.com/user/DarkMatter2525
Tenacious DNA (HD) Religion Debate 2015-07-19 | A brief history of life on planet earth, including many obstacles and near extinctions our ancestors went through to get us here today.Reuploaded with the permission of UppruniTegundanna. Check out his channel for more amazing videos! - http://www.youtube.com/user/UppruniTegundanna/videos?view=0&sort=p&flow=gridClips:Animal ArmageddonCatastropheCellCharles Darwin and the Tree of LifeContactEarth Shocks - MegavolcanoJourney to 10,000BCNASANational Geographic: Born of FireNational Geographic: Destructive ForcesNational Geographic: Earth Investigated - How Life was FormedNational Geographic: Ocean RealmPlanet EarthThe Story of GodWalking with BeastsWalking with CavemenWalking with DinosaursWalking with MonstersMusic:Efling - Stafrænn HákonEindir - EinómaSwedenborgske Rom - JagaCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Rationalism Breeds Atheism Religion Debate 2015-07-11 | Also check out 100 Renowned Academics Speaking About God: youtube.com/watch?v=De6j01DCsZMThe more scientifically literate, intellectually honest and objectively skeptical a person is, the more likely they are to disbelieve in anything supernatural, including gods. This is a compilation of some of the best examples of such individuals with their thoughts on the divine. They include in order of appearance:Lord Martin Rees is the Astronomer Royal and Master of Trinity College, Cambridge. He was President of the Royal Society between 2005 and 2010.Dr Sam Harris is an American author, neuroscientist and CEO of Project Reason. He holds a PhD in neuroscience from UCLA, and a BA in philosophy from Stanford University.Professor Richard Feynman was an American physicist who received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1965.Professor Noam Chomsky is an Institute Professor and professor emeritus of linguistics at MIT and well known as one of the fathers of modern linguistics.Stephen Fry is an English actor, screenwriter, author, playwright, journalist, poet, comedian, television presenter and film director.Professor Leonard Susskind is Professor of Theoretical Physics at Stanford University, and widely regarded as one of the fathers of string theory.Sir Bertrand Russell was an English philosopher who was awarded the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1950. He is considered one of the founders of analytic philosophy and is widely held to be one of the 20th century's premier logicians.Dr Richard Carrier is an American historian who received his PhD in ancient history from Columbia University.Sir David Attenborough is a broadcaster and naturalist. He studied Natural Sciences at Cambridge, and his distinguished career in broadcasting now spans more than 50 years.Professor Neil deGrasse Tyson is an American astrophysicist, the Frederick P. Rose Director of the Hayden Planetarium at the American Museum of Natural History and Visiting Research Scientist and Lecturer at Princeton University. He attended Harvard College (B.A), University of Texas (M.A.) and Columbia University (M.Phil.), (Ph.D.). Professor Vilayanur Ramachandran is a neuroscientist, Director of the Center for Brain and Cognition, and Professor in the Department of Psychology and the Neurosciences Graduate Program at the University of California, San Diego. He obtained his PhD from Trinity College, Cambridge.It seems plainly obvious in the 21st century that rational thought inevitably breeds atheism.All credit for this video goes to Dr Jonathan T. Pararajasingham. Check out his channel for more great videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/JPararajasinghamAnd especially his "Speaking About God" series:50 Renowned Academics Speaking About God: http://youtu.be/s47ArcQL-XQ30 Renowned Writers Speaking About God: http://youtu.be/tpxoD9KFpHIOverview of Rationalism: http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/atheism/types/rationalism.shtmlCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Disproving Gods with Science and History Religion Debate 2015-07-05 | In this lecture, Dr. Richard Carrier quickly surveys the history of major religions, and lays out a collection of logical arguments for why science and history support naturalism, and disprove the god hypothesis. See below for additional resources.Part 2: Q&A (interesting questions, which I cut from this video for time purposes): youtu.be/79UAYyMYk7I?t=46m50sThe Case Against Christianity (playlist): youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf113iNh-64ba5FppqyEFnuJLf3UY5tDRGood articles by Richard Carrier:Why I am Not a Christian: http://infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/whynotchristian.htmlWhy I Don't Buy the Resurrection Story: http://infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/resurrection/lecture.htmland books: http://www.amazon.com/Richard-Carrier/e/B001K8LYEM/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?qid=1435398823&sr=8-1Thanks to CFI Calgary for the original upload. Check out their channel for more excellent videos! youtube.com/user/CFICalgary/videos
Is Slavery in the Bible? Religion Debate 2015-07-03 | This video explores what the Bible God really says about slavery, as well as what Civil War Christians thought about the issue. See below for additional resources:Video created by Discern4. Check out his channel for more great videos! http://www.youtube.com/user/Discern4The Bible and Slavery: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bible_and_slaveryA few choice bible quotes: http://www.evilbible.com/Slavery.htm Links to pro-slavery arguments from southern Christians:Pastor Thorton Stringfellow: http://docsouth.unc.edu/church/string/string.htmlE.W. Warren: http://docsouth.unc.edu/imls/warren/warren.htmlGeorge Fitzhugh: http://docsouth.unc.edu/southlit/fitzhughcan/fitzcan.html"Slavery was established by decree of Almighty God...it is sanctioned in the Bible, in both Testaments, from Genesis to Revelation...it has existed in all ages, has been found among the people of the highest civilization, and in nations of the highest proficiency in the arts." Jefferson Davis, President of the Confederate States of America. "There is not one verse in the Bible inhibiting slavery, but many regulating it. It is not then, we conclude, immoral." Rev. Alexander Campbell "The right of holding slaves is clearly established in the Holy Scriptures, both by precept and example." Rev. R. Furman, D.D., Baptist, of South Carolina "The doom of Ham has been branded on the form and features of his African descendants. The hand of fate has united his color and destiny. Man cannot separate what God hath joined." United States Senator James Henry Hammond. Quotation from the 21st century: "If we apply sola scriptura to slavery, I'm afraid the abolitionists are on relatively weak ground. Nowhere is slavery in the Bible lambasted as an oppressive and evil institution: Vaughn Roste, United Church of Canada.The quotation by Jefferson Davis, listed above, reflected the beliefs of many Americans in the 19th century. Slavery was seen as having been "sanctioned in the Bible." They argued that:1. Biblical passages recognized, controlled, and regulated the practice.2. The Bible permitted owners to beat their slaves severely, even to the point of killing them. However, as long as the slave lingered longer than 24 hours before dying of the abuse, the owner was not regarded as having committed a crime, because -- after all -- the slave was his property. 3. Paul had every opportunity to write in one of his Epistles that human slavery -- the owning of one person as a piece of property by another -- is profoundly evil. His letter to Philemon would have been an ideal opportunity to vilify slavery. But he wrote not one word of criticism.4. Jesus could have condemned the practice. He might have done so in one of his many parables mentioning slaves. But there is no record of him having said anything negative about the institution.Eventually, the abolitionists gained sufficient power to eradicate slavery in most areas of the world by the end of the 19th century. Slavery was eventually recognized as an extreme evil. But this paradigm shift in understanding came at a cost. Christians wondered why the Bible was so supportive of such an immoral practice. They questioned whether the Bible was entirely reliable. Perhaps there were other practices that it accepted as normal which were profoundly evil -- like genocide, torturing prisoners, raping female prisoners of war, forcing rape victims to marry their rapists, executing religious minorities, burning some prostitiutes alive, etc. The innocent faith that Christians had in "the Good Book" was lost -- never to be fully regained.http://www.religioustolerance.org/sla_bibl.htmMusic by Derek Oldman - Venus Opposite Mars (Chillish 303 Mix)http://www.jamendo.com/en/album/15520Prophecy - http://www.jamendo.com/en/album/15520Also be sure to check out an excellent series called "The Slavery Dialogs" by Discovering Religion: http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLABDCAD2EB0C22A53&feature=plcpCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Who Wrote The New Testament Gospels? Religion Debate 2015-06-26 | Did Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John write the gospels attributed to them? When was the first Gospel produced and by whom? Bible scholar Bart D. Ehrman answers these questions in a debate with Craig Evans. See below for additional resources.Why Scholars Doubt the Traditional Authors of the Gospels: adversusapologetica.wordpress.com/2013/12/17/why-scholars-doubt-the-traditional-authors-of-the-gospelsAuthorship of the New Testament: http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Authorship_of_the_New_TestamentFull Bart Ehrman vs. Craig Evans debate: youtube.com/watch?v=L7gmgdk9qG8Copyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
TESTING for faith in God (Proof you do NOT believe) Religion Debate 2015-06-19 | This is a test designed to allow believers to determine if they truly believe in god.Thanks NegationofP for the original upload: youtube.com/user/NEGATI0NofP
The Case for Atheism (Richard Carrier) Religion Debate 2015-06-13 | This is Richard Carrier's opening statement from a "Does God Exist?" debate at Skepticon 2. The full debate (also featuring Victor Stenger and JT Eberhard) can be seen here: youtube.com/watch?v=0WJ31_ZXJ_0 I also recommend checking out Carrier's excellent essay "Why I am not a Christian": http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/whynotchristian.htmland book (by the same title) http://www.amazon.com/Why-Am-Not-Christian-Conclusive/dp/1456588850And if you want more videos like this, check out The Case Against Christianity playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf113iNh-64ba5FppqyEFnuJLf3UY5tDRThanks to HamboneProductions for the original upload. He has many other great videos from Skepticon on his channel. Feel free to check them out here: youtube.com/channel/UCwkTEGxYK4tKsZXISScmUJwCopyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
TheoreticalBullshit vs William Lane Craig (mirror) Religion Debate 2015-05-24 | TBS's video: http://youtu.be/gYpfkdQ32Io?t=1m24sMore problems with the Kalam Cosmological Argument are pointed out in these videos:youtube.com/watch?v=oMwp9Wd-QmEhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KvZGauAmo8http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCCF97F3B92DF3CB8And this website: http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Kalam
The Case for Naturalism (Sean Carroll) Religion Debate 2015-04-19 | Opening statement by Sean Carroll at "The Great Debate: Has Science Refuted Religion?", on 25 March 2012. Other participants in the debate were Michael Shermer, Dinesh D'Souza, and Ian Hutchinson. See the whole debate here: youtube.com/watch?v=ulykALV2FQ8This statement explains how the progress of science has led us to the philosophy of naturalism: the view that there is only one world, which obeys laws of nature, and which we are part of.Michael Shermer's Youtube Channel: youtube.com/user/MichaelShermer/videosSean Carrol's Youtube Channel: youtube.com/user/seancarroll/videosand blog: http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blogThe Skeptic Society: http://www.skeptic.com/about_usI also recommend checking out Carroll's response to the fine tuning argument here: youtube.com/watch?v=ulykALV2FQ8Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
The Line Between Life and Not Life (Ted Talks) Religion Debate 2015-04-11 | In his lab, Martin Hanczyc makes "protocells," experimental blobs of chemicals that behave like living cells. His work demonstrates how life might have first occurred on Earth...and perhaps elsewhere too. Check out the links below for more information:Protocells: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProtocellWikipedia page on abiogenesis: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AbiogenesisTalkorigins Page: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/abioprob/originoflife.htmlTEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes. Featured speakers have included Al Gore on climate change, Philippe Starck on design, Jill Bolte Taylor on observing her own stroke, Nicholas Negroponte on One Laptop per Child, Jane Goodall on chimpanzees, Bill Gates on malaria and mosquitoes, Pattie Maes on the "Sixth Sense" wearable tech, and "Lost" producer JJ Abrams on the allure of mystery. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, development and the arts. Closed captions and translated subtitles in a variety of languages are now available on http://www.TED.com, at http://www.ted.com/translate.Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
The Faith Check: Is There a God? Religion Debate 2015-04-04 | This is part of a great series by Youtuber "TheFaithCheck". If you enjoy the video, feel free to check out the rest of the series here: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB82893A7FE929A2CCopyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.Like Us on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/WFLAtheism & http://www.facebook.com/WeLoveAtheism
The Battle of Faith and Truth Religion Debate 2015-03-29 | This is an exercise for Christians to help you determine if you hold on to beliefs that are not true.Check out The Faith Check playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB82893A7FE929A2CThe story where God kills David's baby: biblegateway.com/passage/?search=2+Samuel+12%3A13-18&version=NIVGod's killings in the bible: http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible.htmlCopyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
The Case Against Christianity - Matt Dillahunty Religion Debate 2015-03-28 | This is Matt Dillahunty's opening statement in a recent debate on the existence of God.To see more videos like this, check out The Case Against Christianity playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf113iNh-64ba5FppqyEFnuJLf3UY5tDRThanks to David Smalley for hosting the debate. For more great content, be sure to check out the Dogma Debate podcast: http://dogmadebate.com and Youtube channel: youtube.com/user/mrdavidsmalley/videosThanks to Brandy Madden for uploading the full debate. If you are interested, you can see it here: youtube.com/watch?v=UiNEuz6wstM
Playing God: The Loving Psychopath Religion Debate 2015-03-22 | A different perspective on the Christian god.Music composition, video editing, and graphics by Ben Kokolas. http://www.youtube.com/user/CircusOfBedlamAudio by Philhellenes: youtube.com/user/philhellenesCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Responding to the Fine Tuning Argument for God (Sean Carroll) Religion Debate 2015-02-08 | Physicist Sean Caroll lays some of the problems with the popular "fine tuning" arguments for a god. You can check out Caroll's post-debate reflections here: http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2014/02/24/post-debate-reflectionsCopyright Disclaimer: Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Genesis Creation Visualized - Scientifically Religion Debate 2015-01-26 | How might the first chapter of the Bible look if the Genesis creation narrative were an accurate and literal account of the creation of the Cosmos? Enjoy this visual re-write of Genesis to see a more scientifically accurate, and poetic account of "Biblical Creation," and consider the question, "If time machines prove the first 18 verses of the Bible are wrong - why make public policy based on the assumption that the rest are right?"Created by TheSkepticalMagician - youtube.com/channel/UC9-0PiGi2XfSEsv9mzft1Jgtheskepticalmagician.wordpress.comSource Material:Copyright free space images and animations are courtesy of NASA public domain resources - http://www.nasa.gov/audience/formedia/features/MP_Photo_Guidelines.htmlBackground music is copyright free audio from Apple Logic - http://store.apple.com/us/mac/mac-accessories/software#!&categoryReplacement=standard%2Fhome%2Fshop_mac%2Fsoftware%2Fmusic_audioAll other appearances and spoken word portions of this video are performed by the author and creator.
Science Doesnt Care About Religion Religion Debate 2015-01-17 | Science seeks the truth about the natural world through observation, experimentation and identification. Science does not intentionally refute religion, it just so happens that's where the evidence leads.Created by TheAtheistAdvocate: facebook.com/TheAtheistAdvocateCheck out his Youtube channel as well: youtube.com/user/ReligousTruth/videos
Dust That Sings Religion Debate 2015-01-11 | Putting the history of our planet in perspective.Reuploaded with permission of Philhellenes. Check out his channel for more great videos: youtube.com/channel/UCh9g56Xhr_OKqZKxN4b4KrQ
The Case Against the Resurrection (Richard Carrier) Religion Debate 2015-01-10 | Historian Richard Carrier gives a comprehensive refutation of the arguments for a physical resurrection of Jesus. These clips were taken from his two debates with Mike Licona. You can watch the full debates here:Debate 1: youtube.com/watch?v=-EGrzxkozVUDebate 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1_GYR3xjPQWhy I Don't Buy the Resurrection Story by Richard Carrier: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrier/resurrection/introduction.htmlOther writings by Richard Carrier: http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/richard_carrierHis books: http://www.amazon.com/Richard-Carrier/e/B001K8LYEM/ref=ntt_athr_dp_pel_1and website: http://www.richardcarrier.infoIf you would like to download this video, you can do so here: http://www.mediafire.com/?ghzwje2e6maemdgCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Skeptical thinking (The Atheist Experience) Religion Debate 2015-01-08 | Matt Dillahunty on the virtues of skepticism.Check out The Atheist Experience playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf113iNh-64YtdxBJ2lw-dds2xlU9EAgU
Do You Know God? (Darkmatter2525 mirror) Religion Debate 2015-01-01 | Reuploaded with permission of Darkmatter2525: youtube.com/user/DarkMatter2525Billions of people claim to “know” God. How could they all be wrong? Simple. Just listen to them. If ten people claim to know your friend Jimmy, yet they all describe Jimmy in different, incompatible ways, then either they don’t know Jimmy, or Jimmy has been doing some lying.Like Us on Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/WFLAtheism & http://www.facebook.com/WeLoveAtheism
Why Christianity is Unreasonable (Richard Carrier) Religion Debate 2014-12-27 | This is an excerpt from Richard Carrier's opening statement in his debate against David Marshall. The full debate can be seen here: youtube.com/watch?v=ooXCaMwTGD8 (Carrier starts at 26:00)Event hosted between the University of Alabama Non-Theists and Ratio Christi (UAH Chapter)http://www.uahnontheists.orghttp://ratiochristi.org/uahIf you enjoyed the video, be sure to check out my "The Case Against Christianity" playlist: youtube.com/playlist?list=PLf113iNh-64ba5FppqyEFnuJLf3UY5tDRCopyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. I realize no profit, monetary or otherwise, from the exhibition of these videos.
Considering a Creator (Sam Harris) Religion Debate 2014-12-21 | Sam Harris discusses the rather clumsy way the gods choose to reveal themselves to humanity. The full interview can be seen here: youtube.com/watch?v=o9zeGbkjKk8Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Wanderers (Carl Sagan) Religion Debate 2014-12-06 | Wanderers is a vision of humanity's expansion into the Solar System, based on scientific ideas and concepts of what our future in space might look like, if it ever happens. The locations depicted in the film are digital recreations of actual places in the Solar System, built from real photos and map data where available.Without any apparent story, other than what you may fill in by yourself, the idea of the film is primarily to show a glimpse of the fantastic and beautiful nature that surrounds us on our neighboring worlds - and above all, how it might appear to us if we were there.For more information and stills gallery, please turn to: http://erikwernquist.com/wanderersmgur.com/a/Ur5dPCREDITS:VISUALS - Erik Wernquist - erik@erikwernquist.comMUSIC - Cristian Sandquist - cristiansandquist@mac.comWORDS AND VOICE - Carl SaganCOLOR GRADE - Caj Müller/Beckholmen Film - caj@beckholmenfilm.seLIVE ACTION PHOTOGRAPHY - Mikael Hall/Vidiotism - mikael@vidiotism.comLIVE ACTION PERFORMANCE - Anna Nerman, Camilla Hammarström, Hanna MellinVOCALIST - Nina Fylkegård - nina@ladystardust.seTHANK YOU - Johan Persson, Calle Herdenberg, Micke Lindgren, Satrio J. Studt, Tomas Axelsson, Christian Lundqvist, Micke Lindell, Sigfrid Söderberg, Fredrik Strage, Johan Antoni, Henrik Johansson, Michael Uvnäs, Hanna MellinTHIS FILM WAS MADE WITH USE OF PHOTOS AND TEXTURES FROM:NASA/JPL, NASA/CICLOPS, NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Scientific Visualization Studio, ESA, John Van Vliet, Björn Jonsson (and many others.Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use. All copyrighted materials contained herein belong to their respective copyright holders, I do not claim ownership over any of these materials. In no way do I benefit either financially or otherwise from this video.
Moses and the 17 Commandments Religion Debate 2014-11-29 | Why are the "official" 10 commandments in the bible different from the 10 commonly cited by Christians?Who wrote the Pentateuch / Torah?Did Moses prophesy about Jesus?Thanks to Discern4 for making this video. Check out his channel for more great content. - youtube.com/user/Discern4/videos?flow=grid&view=0&sort=p
If I Were the Devil Religion Debate 2014-09-27 | A transcript of one version of Paul Harvey's homily: http://www.arlingtoncardinal.com/2012/03/paul-harvey-if-i-were-the-devil-radio-audio-and-transcriptThanks to GrapplingIgnorance for the original upload. Subscribe to his channel for more great videos: youtube.com/user/GrapplingIgnorance/videos?sort=p&view=0&flow=gridGod's killings in the Bible: http://dwindlinginunbelief.blogspot.com/2010/04/drunk-with-blood-gods-killings-in-bible.html
