Ancient Aliens Debunked is a 3 hour refutation of the theories proposed on the History Channel series Ancient Aliens. It is essentially a point by point critique of the "ancient astronaut theory" which has been proposed by people like Erich von Däniken and Zecharia Sitchin as well as many others.
The film covers topics like: Ancient building sites: Puma Punku, The Pyramids, Baalbek, Incan sites, And Easter Island. Ancient artifacts: Pacal's rocket, the Nazca lines, the Tolima "fighter jets", the Egyptian "light bulb", Ufo's in ancient art, and the crystal skulls. Ancient text issues: Ezekiel's wheel, Ancient nuclear warfare, Vimana's, the Anunnaki, and the Nephilim.
It was produced by Chris White and includes commentary from Dr. Michael Hesier.
It is distributed for free on the internet. Viewers are encouraged to download, share, or burn copies to DVD, as long as they do not profit from its distribution.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.”
Ancient Aliens Debunked is a 3 hour refutation of the theories proposed on the History Channel series Ancient Aliens. It is essentially a point by point critique of the "ancient astronaut theory" which has been proposed by people like Erich von Däniken and Zecharia Sitchin as well as many others.
The film covers topics like: Ancient building sites: Puma Punku, The Pyramids, Baalbek, Incan sites, And Easter Island. Ancient artifacts: Pacal's rocket, the Nazca lines, the Tolima "fighter jets", the Egyptian "light bulb", Ufo's in ancient art, and the crystal skulls. Ancient text issues: Ezekiel's wheel, Ancient nuclear warfare, Vimana's, the Anunnaki, and the Nephilim.
It was produced by Chris White and includes commentary from Dr. Michael Hesier.
It is distributed for free on the internet. Viewers are encouraged to download, share, or burn copies to DVD, as long as they do not profit from its distribution.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.”Coral Castle Mystery solved with AMAZING new footageVerseByVerseBT2015-02-17 | Video: Chris White Ancient Aliens Debunked: youtube.com/watch?v=j9w-i5oZqaQ Original footage used with permission from Darren Nemeth.The Gospel is GOOD News - Kinetic Typography Sermon JamVerseByVerseBT2014-11-01 | This is my first attempt at kinetic typography I hope to do more in the future.
The Seven-Year Covenant Then he shall confirm a covenant with many for one week; But in the middle of the week He shall bring an end to sacrifice and offering. (Daniel 9:27a)
Here in the last verse of Daniel chapter 9, we have a reference to the Antichrist making some kind of covenant with many people. This verse gives weight to the thesis that the Antichrist will claim to be the Jewish Messiah. Even until very recently, I've assumed that this verse was referring to a "seven-year peace agreement." It has become so common for people to refer to this verse as a peace treaty of some sort that I confess I sort of took it for granted.
However, there is no reason to think this covenant is speaking of a peace treaty. In all the Bible versions I have available to me though Bible software and the Internet (a considerable number), the word "peace" is not mentioned or even implied. In addition, I suggest that whatever this covenant is that the Antichrist makes must be a covenant that was already in place, based on the underlying Hebrew text.
I believe this verse is referring to the Antichrist trying to fulfill the modern Jewish expectations of a "new covenant" that the Messiah will make in the last days. This concept is detailed in many places in the Old Testament, but a notable one is in Jeremiah 31:31, which states: "Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah."
If ever there was proof of visitation by ancient astronauts, one of the best and most convincing pieces of evidence would have to be the epic Nuremburg "space battle" of April 4,1561, recorded on April 14, 1561 (some sources say 1566, but the date on the woodcut in Roman numerals seems to read 1561). Especially since almost all retellings of the story mainly focus on the picture and a loose summary of the events that occurred that day, with an emphasis on UFO battles and crashed ships. And good luck finding anything else besides that. Just about everywhere you read it, the story goes like so. Residents woke up early one April morning and saw the spectacle in the above woodcut, which clearly looks like the final space battle from Return of the Jedi complete with X-Wings, explosions and Darth Vader's star destroyer. Making this even more convincing is that some of the objects are said to have fought for a while, and some crashed as seen in the lower right hand corner. Orbs and crosses fighting. Tubes and a giant arrow. Crashing ships. Has to be a space battle. - Or does it?Caesars Messiah Debunked - Covert Messiah Refuted - Joe Artwill CritqueVerseByVerseBT2013-10-12 | My Website: http://caesarsmessiahdebunked.com
Caesar's Messiah was a book published by a dot com businessman named Joseph Atwill in 2005. Last year, he released a documentary based on the book and everyone is talking about it all of a sudden, because Atwill put out the world's most misleading press release for his film screening in London. Richard Dawkins then retweeted the press release, even though he said he didn't endorse the theory, and now this eight-year-old theory is news again. Thank you, Richard Dawkins.
The basic premise of Caesar's Messiah is that the Roman Imperial family, the Flavians, invented Jesus by using the Jewish historian Josephus and, presumably, other people to write the gospels after Rome defeated the Jews in 70 AD. The idea was to make the militant Jewish rebels accept a peaceful Messiah and, thereby, give Rome less trouble.
Atwill says that the New Testament was written in a code that requires you to read Josephus' War of the Jews alongside the New Testament to get the joke. He, of course, is the only person to crack this code, making him super smart.
The following are just some of the major problems with this theory. For footnotes and references to the claims I'm about to make, go to the link in the description or to the website ceasarsmessiahdebunked.com.
One of the biggest problems this theory has is the existence of Christianity before 73 AD, when Atwill says that the idea was concocted by the Romans. Quite simply, if Christianity can be demonstrated to exist before that time, this theory is toast.
The famous historian Tacitus says that Nero was persecuting Christians in Rome in 64 AD. He also mentions that "immense multitudes" of Christians were living in Rome at the time. Try to figure out why "immense multitudes" of Christians are in Rome ten years before Christianity was supposed to have been invented.
Suetonius also mentions Nero punishing Christians, as well as many Christian historians. That seems like a bad PR idea to write this kind of stuff: "Hey, everyone! Join the new religion so we can burn you alive and feed you to lions. The signup sheet is right over there."
Paul, who tradition has being killed by Nero around 66 AD, wrote thirteen of the letters in the New Testament, all of them very Christian. Even the most skeptical scholars in this field don't date these letters later than 68 AD, and most of them much earlier than that. You should find out why even these skeptical scholars feel the need to place these letters so early, which you can do at the website caesarsmessiahdebunked.com.
Okay, so, let's move beyond the historical problems with saying that Christianity didn't exist before 73 AD, and let's look at some of the common sense or logical problems with his theory.
Why in the world would the Romans do this? They had already totally crushed the Jews in 70 AD, destroying the city and the temple.
When the Romans had a problem with people not wanting to conform to their rules, which they did often, they did what they do best: crush people into submission with war. There was never any need to do anything different, especially at this point in their history. Also, consider that the Jews weren't even a threat to them in any meaningful way. Plus, as I said, they had already completely destroyed them.
Atwill, in response to J.P. Holding on the point that the Romans had already defeated the Jews, said well, yeah, but Josephus mentions that the Romans had some problems with a few Jewish rebels from Alexandria just after the war. Holding replied, saying:
What Josephus refers to is disturbances in Alexandria that were instigated by the Sicarii who had fled to Jerusalem after being beaten there. So, in reality, this was nothing more than a mop-up after a decisive victory -- and I might add, no reason for Titus to invent a religion for them, since he beat them soundly there as well.
Okay, so let's look a little bit at the New Testament that Titus supposedly created, and see if it makes sense to you that the Romans would make this up and actually want people to read it.
This film is a detailed study of the bible about the concept of the Sabbath. As the Sabbath cannot be full understood without a good understanding of the scriptures this film is also a study on the different covenants in the Bible, such as the Abrahamic and the Mosaic. This is a study for every Christian, not just people concerned about the Sabbath, as it is the story of the Gospel. I hope it will help you understand the plan of God more and praise Him for His goodness to us.
Scripture references in the video in order of appearance.
John 14:6, Matthew 11:27, Acts 4:12 Romans 1:18-20 Romans 1:19; 2:14-15 Romans 1:18--3:23 John 14:6, Matthew 11:27, Acts 4:12 Gen 5:5--5:19 Gen 5:22-24 Hebrews 11:5-6 Job 1:5, Job 19:25 Galatians 3:6-3:22, Hebrews 11:17-19, Romans 4:1-4:14 2 chronicles 2:17-2:18 Ruth 1:15-16 John 4:21-23 Romans 1:21-2:1 Romans 2:4-6 2 Peter 3:9 Romans 5:6
what about those that have never heard the gospel jesus christ repent apologetics movie chris white knowwheretorun1984Why Would God Allow Suffering?VerseByVerseBT2011-12-15 | Why Would God Allow Suffering -The Problem of Evil - William Lane Craig
The audio clip was used with permission by www.reasonablefaith.orgHas The Bible Been Changed?VerseByVerseBT2011-12-15 | Can You Trust the Bible Historically? - Is it a Game of Telephone? - What about the Gnostic Gospels?
Can we trust the New Testament as a historical document? Hasn't the Bible been rewritten so many times that it can't be trusted? Wasn't the New Testament written hundreds of years after Christ? *Was the bible changed?
Clip from http://www.100huntley.com used with written permissionAll Religions Are One....Or Are They?VerseByVerseBT2011-12-15 | What about the religious pluralism question? Here are some videos I mentioned: What do I have to do to be saved: http://vimeo.com/27517045 Legalism Debunked http://vimeo.com/27517127Did Jesus Claim to Be The Messiah or God?VerseByVerseBT2011-12-15 | The Divinity of Christ - Did Jesus Claim to be God? - Chris White
There are many benefits to sharing the gospel message through DVD tracts. 1. Rarely does an evangelist have enough time to explain the gospel as thoroughly and as powerfully as it is presented in the DVD tracts.
2. Giving a person a DVD allows them to watch it in the privacy of their home, where they are comfortable, and hopefully more willing to consider the gospel.
3. You can hand out more DVD tracts that you can give presentations of the gospel, they can also be mailed
4. When evangelizing to special groups like Muslims, Mormons, and Jehovah's Witnesses sometimes it helps for them to hear testimonies of people that have come out of those groups by the power of Christ and we have special DVD tracts that do just that.
For Churches:
Churches can print up DVD tracts and put their contact information on the packaging
For Missionaries
can either pass out the DVD tract or have special showings of one of the DVD tracts, we are constantly working to translate the DVD tract into new languages
For Evangelists
like myself, It really helped me cover more ground having the DVD tract to hand out.
Im trying to keep the message simple but powerful, but if you have suggestions of more DVD tracts to use feel free to contact me, There are many more choices of videos out there, and if you would like to use material from other movies you have found on Youtube or Google or similar websites I have made a tutorial video to show you how to do so.
Links on the History of Ley Lines http://www.pauldevereux.co.uk/html/body_leylines.html http://www.scienceandreason.ca/pseudoscience/pseudoarchaeology/falling-for-ley-lines http://www.deepinfo.com/WorldGrid.htmZeitgeist Refuted Final Cut (full movie)VerseByVerseBT2010-12-29 | This film was made by Elliot Nesch For a free dvd, visit: http://www.holybibleprophecy.org Zeitgeist Refuted is a documentary film in response to the bold claims made in Peter Joseph's Zeitgeist the movie concerning the Christian faith. This film examines the similarities and differences of pagan religions according to history and scholarly opinion. Additionally, it explores the historicity of Jesus. Also discussed are the Jesus Myth Theory and Astrotheology. The viewer will also see a critique of the works of Zeitgeist sources cited in the Zeitgeist bibliography such as Acharya S, Gerald Massey and Jordan Maxwell. This documentary exposes the Freemasonry, Theosophy and New Age influence on Zeitgeist and the Zeitgeist Movement.The Real Zeitgeist Challenge Debunked (full video)VerseByVerseBT2010-12-29 | http://nowheretorunradio.com Chris White debunks a recent interview that Peter Joseph The director of the Zeitgeist Movie does with Acharya S (or Dorthy D.M. Murdock) the main source for the movies claims about Jesus.
show notes: http://zeitgeist challenge
full interview audio: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sOf3f_...
link to the first (June 11, 2008) rebuttle to achaya s by zeitgeist challenge http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmUGPb...
evidence of the existence of jesus http://video.google.com/videoplay?doc...
peter joseph interviews acharya s Achary S Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection refutationUFOs in Ancient Art Debunked (P2. Egyptian Art)VerseByVerseBT2010-12-29 | http://nowheretorunradio.com Websites referenced Grey at the tomb Ptahhotep http://www.sprezzatura.it%2FArte%2FArte_UFO_6.htm Abydos Helicopter http://www.catchpenny.org/abydos.html
The first impression is that at the basis of these web sites lies a very simplistic methodology, being any historical or artistic knowledge carefully avoided. The standard practice seems to be: first taking a book concerning art, better if dealing with art works of the 17th or previous centuries; then looking for any strange detail, above all saucer-like objects of any kind. Thats it. This way, obviously, it is easy both to detect strange elements and to declare them alien or unidentified in respect to the environment or the period in which they appear.
The point is that no one of the authors of these web sites takes into account the symbolic meaning of these strange elements in respect to the art of the period. Worst of all, by considering these elements as the representation of something real or really seen by the artist, they assume that the artist, eg. an Italian artist of the 15th century or an anonymous Byzantine painter, would actually be allowed to insert any non canonical or un-codified element into a religious representation. On the contrary, in past times the commissioners (those who choose the subject and supervised the execution of the art work - in these cases the religious institutions) would have never allowed the author to insert into a work of art anything other than what previously decided, especially in case of religious subjects. In this latter case, in addition, restrictions were even stronger.
At this point one may wonder whether these authors writing about art and UFOs have ever entered a museum or a church. If so, they would be astonished about the infinite amount of strange objects included into paintings, statues and art works of any kind
Next chapters focus on the real subject and meaning of a variety of art works which appear into Italian and other ufology web sites, and are intended as a strong response to those web pages which publish ancient art reproductions without any knowledge of their real subject, meaning and historical value.Bill Cooper Debunked Jordan MaxwellVerseByVerseBT2010-12-29 | While listening to William (Bill) Coopers famous "Mystery Babylon" series I noticed that Bill was reading something, like he normally did,, but this time he didn't say what it was he was reading. I found out it was Jordan Maxwell's book "That Old Time Religion" After I made that connection Cooper did all the debunking. This presentation will show the following: 1.) Cooper makes it very clear that he believes Maxwell to be spreading the "mystery" religion 2.) It will also show that Maxwell is NOT showing us what "they" believe, but that he is telling us (in essence) to believe what "they" believe. 3.) Cooper clearly implicates Zechariah Sitchin in relation to Maxwells work. 4.) It will explain Coopers position, which has been misrepresented by people that failed to realize that he would read Masonic literature often in order to expose it to the public, he clearly seems to think Maxwell book is Masonic as well. 5.) I break down the interview of Maxwell on The Hour of The TimeSacred Name Movement Debunked (full video)VerseByVerseBT2010-12-29 | This is a refutation of the "Sacred Name" theories or divine name.
Topics Discussed:
Baal The Name or Shem of God The Tetragrameton Is Jesus connected to Zeus? Is deus or dios connect to Zeus? How did we get the name Jesus? What is the true pronunciation of Jesus? Are we calling on pagan gods when we call on modern names of God and Jesus? Does Krishna = Christ? Where did the word Jehovah come from ? What does the bible say about saying the original hebrew names?