Uploaded April 2011 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
This is a video response to youtube.com/watch?v=U3EDcQ0cheI&feature=feedlik
Youtube partners and privileges by NoMoreC2
In it he is critical of YouTube for not allowing fair use when it comes to YouTube Partners. As it turns out the ability for partners to block their content from being used by others is not something YouTube partners can do.
First lets define our terms. youtube.com/playboy is a Branded Channel. In other words they actually pay YouTube for the right to be here. You can learn more about what a Branded Channel is here youtube.com/t/advertising_brand_channels
However NoMoreC2 is correct in his claim of hypocrisy on YouTube's part when it comes to removing videos for showing too much skin while at the same time taking money from Playboy.
Now some partners are enrolled into what is called the Content ID or Content Management System. You can learn about the program from YouTube employee Margaret Stewart here: youtube.com/watch?v=UoX-YihV_ew
Here is the application page for the Content ID program
youtube.com/content_id_signup
Once approved you can either track, monetize, or block content uploaded to YouTube. You can also block content being shown to certain countries.
Now the one thing I disagree with here is if someone wishes to claim a video uploaded by someone else and choses to monetize it. The ad revenue is not shared with the person who made the video. That is why in most cases I fill out the dispute form for the content ID match.
However the Content ID system is preferable to me compared to how it used to be back in the early years of YouTube. Content ID matches do not result in a copyright strike and there is no threat to your channel even if the video is blocked. You do run the risk of getting a DMCA if you fight the content ID match but that can be disputed as well. The Content ID system is not perfect, however it has resulted is fewer DMCAs for mashups, and parodies uploaded to YouTube.
How to put a condom on a Banana with commentary by Coughlan616
youtube.com/watch?v=duPS1uJz04Y
This video was blocked by VideoJug when he tried to post it so I posted it on my channel and fought the content ID match and the subsequent DMCA to get this video on YouTube.
youtube.com/coughlan616
Re: Don't Circumcise Me Bro
youtube.com/watch?v=xL1Dde8koWA
Originally had a content ID match from Onision that was sucessfully disputed.
This is a video response to youtube.com/watch?v=U3EDcQ0cheI&feature=feedlik
Youtube partners and privileges by NoMoreC2
In it he is critical of YouTube for not allowing fair use when it comes to YouTube Partners. As it turns out the ability for partners to block their content from being used by others is not something YouTube partners can do.
First lets define our terms. youtube.com/playboy is a Branded Channel. In other words they actually pay YouTube for the right to be here. You can learn more about what a Branded Channel is here youtube.com/t/advertising_brand_channels
However NoMoreC2 is correct in his claim of hypocrisy on YouTube's part when it comes to removing videos for showing too much skin while at the same time taking money from Playboy.
Now some partners are enrolled into what is called the Content ID or Content Management System. You can learn about the program from YouTube employee Margaret Stewart here: youtube.com/watch?v=UoX-YihV_ew
Here is the application page for the Content ID program
youtube.com/content_id_signup
Once approved you can either track, monetize, or block content uploaded to YouTube. You can also block content being shown to certain countries.
Now the one thing I disagree with here is if someone wishes to claim a video uploaded by someone else and choses to monetize it. The ad revenue is not shared with the person who made the video. That is why in most cases I fill out the dispute form for the content ID match.
However the Content ID system is preferable to me compared to how it used to be back in the early years of YouTube. Content ID matches do not result in a copyright strike and there is no threat to your channel even if the video is blocked. You do run the risk of getting a DMCA if you fight the content ID match but that can be disputed as well. The Content ID system is not perfect, however it has resulted is fewer DMCAs for mashups, and parodies uploaded to YouTube.
How to put a condom on a Banana with commentary by Coughlan616
youtube.com/watch?v=duPS1uJz04Y
This video was blocked by VideoJug when he tried to post it so I posted it on my channel and fought the content ID match and the subsequent DMCA to get this video on YouTube.
youtube.com/coughlan616
Re: Don't Circumcise Me Bro
youtube.com/watch?v=xL1Dde8koWA
Originally had a content ID match from Onision that was sucessfully disputed.
