rockets push off air
(KillerSpray.com) METEOROLOGIST OF 10 YEARS TOTALLY IGNORED BY SO-CALLED ACTIVISTS (CHEMTRAILS)
updated
Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger MSc PhD Privat-Docent is a public health scientist with an international academic research and teaching career in public health at the University of Geneva, Switzerland. She is Professor at the University of Lausanne and Universities of Switzerland as well as for an American University Program on Global Health and Development in Geneva and for the Study Abroad international training program. Astrid has authored more than 180 scientific articles, policy documents and government, EU and UN reports, as well as 12 books. She received an award from Switzerland and from the United Nations Secretary General for her international work and was a consultant and a project collaborator with both the WHO and the UN during her career. Astrid worked for more than 3 years with the WHO in Geneva to develop a training course for member states to implement the WHO International Health Regulation (IHR) as a legally binding law for all member states. Astrid became skeptical about the COVID-19 narrative and the WHO’s interventions at an early stage when she found them to be contrary to the IHR pandemic preparedness guidelines. She wrote several articles where she questioned the risk assessment and emergency management of member states and the massive policy response reported in scientific and media articles.
Transcript
And I appreciate the World Economic Forum providing me the opportunity to be on this stage and say F**K you Claus Schwab and F**K your new world order. We the people were born free we will stay free and you and all of your globalist friends, including everyone in this room, can go F**K yourselves.
*FREE* Tyga Type Beat - "CRAZY FROG" ft Offset
youtube.com/watch?v=zTB7iBLh-os
Produced by: Call Me G
@callmeg_._
Dr. Rosanna Chifari is a neurologist in Italy.
The International Covid Summit, organized by the association RéinfoLiberté and the Syndicat Enseignement Recherche Liberté continued in Massy, near Paris.
April 1, 2022- ICS - R.Chifari « The neurological effects of spike »
As surprising as it may seem!
talkaboutbruno.ca
27:50 Says it all!
"Your going to have distortions, if you're trying to force something onto a curved surface that wasn't measured on a curved surface!"
The video can end right there, and this is even mentioned in the video. Why? Because it is pointed out that earth has been measured (surveyed) in x y z coordinates (think graph paper, the z is just elevation) and then these measurements were NECESSARILY necessarily distorted to be put on a curved surface on a globe!--That's the end of the glob!
Google search: * how is mercator projection made * [1st result at top of search, below]
His most famous work, the Mercator projection, is a geographical chart where the spherical globe is flattened into a two-dimensional map, with latitude and longitude lines drawn in a straight grid. Mercator's view of the world is one that has endured through the centuries and still helps navigators today. Oct 19, 2023
google.com/search?q=how+is+mercator+projection+made&oq=how+is+mercator&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
[link from top search result]
education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/gerardus-mercator
Mercator World Map
Geradus Mercator's world maps flattened the spherical planet to make it easier to display. Displays of the landmasses are not necessarily proportional to their actual size, especially toward the poles.
If you have ever seen a map of the world in a classroom or in an atlas, chances are you have seen the work of Gerardus Mercator, a 16th-century Flemish cartographer (mapmaker). His most famous work, the Mercator projection, is a geographical chart where the spherical globe is flattened into a two-dimensional map, with latitude and longitude lines drawn in a straight grid. Mercator’s view of the world is one that has endured through the centuries and still helps navigators today.
Mercator was born in Flanders (located in modern-day Belgium) in 1512. The son of a cobbler, Mercator grew up in a poor family. He graduated from the University of Louvain in 1532, where he studied mathematics, geography, and astronomy. After graduating, Mercator developed his skills as an engraver, calligrapher, and geographer, and then began making globes and scientific instruments. As his reputation grew, Mercator published several maps of places around the world. These included an early version of his world map, which showed the globe as a heart-shaped projection.
He continued studying the sciences and making maps and instruments for wealthy, and sometimes high-profile, clients. But in 1544, Mercator was arrested under suspicion of heresy; the traveling he did for research had made church officials wary. After spending a few months in prison, he was released and continued his studies.
In 1569, Mercator published his epic world map. This map, with its Mercator projection, was designed to help sailors navigate around the globe. They could use latitude and longitude lines to plot a straight route. Mercator’s projection laid out the globe as a flattened version of a cylinder. All the latitude and longitude lines intersected at 90-degree angles. Because the projection was intended to be a reference for navigation and not land geography, the landmasses on the map are not necessarily proportional to their actual size; at higher latitudes, landmasses appear larger than their actual size. Despite these distortions, Mercator’s projection is still heavily used today.
In addition to publishing his famous projection, Mercator was the pioneer of another geographical tool we use to this day. He coined the term “atlas” (named after the Greek mythological figure who held the world on his shoulders) to describe a collection of maps. Mercator continued his cartography work for the rest of his life, publishing parts of his atlas until his death in 1594.
http://stick.flat.wtf original version (includes using shadows to find north)
Original title: SHADOWS PROVE Sun circling above us (complete course everything you need to know about shadows)
Alternate edit,
GLOBE CAN'T SHADOW A Deep Dive 😆😁😂 shadows.flat.wtf
(starts with analemma, does not include finding north with shadows)
http://shadows.flat.wtf
youtube.com/watch?v=cdh_XahtDDw
Old title: "Obviously Flat Earth (add Sun & Dome to Gleason Map)"
http://flat.wtf debunks this nonsensical comment, at this link youtube.com /watch?v=ka0vlArrT2U &lc=Ugz2dFvjBdFJkrqvoAR4AaABAg.9ydrE_EFnO1A08Mk8Laji_
@engineeringtheweirdguy2103
6 days ago (as of Feb. 29th, 2024)
@rocketspushoffair you’re repeating the same debunked line. You keep saying “it requires belief that a cracked body can spin like a solid body… and can have trillions of psi tensile strength” no. It doesn’t require that belief. AGAIN, because gravity is pulling it in, much harder than it’s being spun out. So it doesn’t require ANY tensile strength, because, according to the globe model, it’s under COMPRESSION
Put down the script for a second. Your entire argument about the spin being impossible relies utterly on ignoring gravity and pretending it isn’t apart of the globe model. Which is by definition, a strawman fallacy. Because you’re not debunking the globe model, you’re debunking a model you made up, that doesn’t include gravity. Then claiming it’s the globe model. You’ve built a strawman to defeat. Yours is a flawed argument.
rockets push off air REPLY TO GLOBE-RIDER:
@Rrrick "Shadows will trace a straight line on a globe if and only if the declination of the sun is 0, i.e. the sun is above the equator, i.e. it is an equinox." No, only straight lines are possible on a globe, everywhere the Sun is observed to rise and set. Your "if and only if" has been debunked. There are an infinite number of places other than what you specified, that straight lines are created on the globe. The video above line.flat.wtf proves it, as does the other example at stick.flat.wtf Denial is all you have. 😁😆🤩🤠🤯🥳🤕🥸
In other words, dear globe-rider, if you accept fake globe earth claims about the reason (curve of earth) we see the sun rise to high noon and then set, you cannot use "the sun is too far away" excuse, to get out of the required camera rotation compensation, because, the sun then is also too far away for earth curve to be the reason we see the sun rise to noon and then set.
Moreover, my video at http://azimuth.flat.wtf proves in autoCAD that sunrise and sunset azimuth angles would be the same everywhere on fake globe earth, because the sun is so far away. The reason is that THE EARTH CURVE BECOMES .0016 DEGREES = ZERO if you lived on a ball 100 million miles away from the sun. Globe-riders, cannot disagree, if they believe in a distant far away sun!
Hence, you can see that earth's curve is eliminated by the great distance of the sun. That is, the great distance of the sun flattens the curve of the earth ball. And that's the end of the globe!
The azimuth angle of the sunrise would be the same at all locations if we were on a ball. It isn't... proving the sun is not 93 million miles away.
OBJECTION: "moving along the terminator line CHANGES THE ANGLE TO NORTH"
ANSWER: No, it does not. North is always a right angle to latitude.😆😁😂
COMMENT: Marten Trudeau
"Basic AutoCad is accurate to the fifteenth decimal place, it's a wonderful program. -- Fantastic video, those angles at 93 million miles is amazing AutoCad does figure them with so much accuracy. The heliocentric ball earth solar system is not working on so many levels and it's an intentional lie to lead people away from faith in God and the bible, which is the truth."
The way the fake Sun (smudge) fades in and out can be created in Paint by a kid. And the way the Sun takes the glare with it.
In the fake video, the Sun (smudge) disappears/reappears TRHOUGH THE OBJECT. Not around it. No Sun rays!
In the real footage, no part of the tree (with a relative diameter to the Sun the same as the thin pole in the fake video) swallows up the Sun, glare and all, in the same way a kid would be able to reproduce using Paint.😆
And don't forget the lovely editing artifact in the fake video, you know, that vertical guide line that follows the fake sun until it fades out and reappears when the fake sun fades in, and never changes at all throughout 24 hours.
This writer is recognized as an able exponent of globular hypotheses, and it is generally conceded that what he says may be regarded as correct.
You don't live on a ball! 😂😂😂
What a complete mess the fake cracked pear globe is in! Total disarray, zero accuracy, circumnavigations in the south look like a 3 year old drew the path! HAAHHHAAHAAAAHAHAA!!!!!
Is the Bible From Heaven, Is the Earth a Globe?--Alex Gleason. There is a chapter near the end (chapter 19) that contains ship log data that confirms longitude diverges south of the equator. The book is full of flat earth proof. (Direct custom link http://Gleason.flat.wtf ) vaultedearth.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/is-the-bible-from-heaven-is-earth-a-globe.pdf
The Gleason map is an azimuthal equidistant map. The distances to the only pole on earth are to the north pole correct (that's the claim) and as my video showed, the latitudes need calibration. And you see that the path of the Challenger plotted on a Mercator map (see direct custom link below) or a globe, looks like a 3 year old did it with a crayon! It only looks like a circumnavigation of the south, on the Gleason map, the military "Air Map". I can use the entire route on a Gleason map, to show it looks like a proper circumnavigation, I can do the same with Captain Cook's path, all three trips together look normal on the Gleason map. In every case, and in every emergency landing,they look disfigured on the globe and Mercator, which proves everything.
Also, the FACT remains, that earth is motionless and flat. That is the basis and the starting point of all intelligent inquiry.
Someone (Paulster X) tried to be a smart guy. In his reply he deducts 20% from 7637 recorded nautical miles; when only 17% (12 ÷ 14.4) is justified! this is in addition to GOING WELL ONTO THE LAND OF ANTARCTICA! You can see everything in the photos at his link (below).
"No, it was not a good match. You suggested measuring this with string, so never one to shy away from a challenge, I did. I approximated the route on a Gleason map based on the route map in the link below. I then curved a piece of string around the rhumb line (following the line of latitude) and another along the voyage route. The first measured 12cm, the second 14.4, so the route was around 20% greater than the rhumb line distance. Using your voyage distance of 7637NM and deducting 20% gives us a rhumb line distance of 6109NM. Dividing by 126.5 degrees gives a distance per degree of 48.3NM, or 55.5 statute miles and a latitude circumference of 19,995 statute miles. The expected earth circumference at 36 degrees latitude is 20,169 miles - so my little escapade with a piece of string looks to be accurate within less than 1%. Not bad eh?"
"Here’s the photos and proof: https://photos.app.goo.gl/1pZoA4HmUCB... Do you still think that voyage approximated a rhumb line?" Direct custom short link: http://18111.flat.wtf
Let's use Paulster X's strings! 12 cm divided by 14.4 cm = .833333333 so let's take that percentage of 7637 NM = 6364.1666 NM divide by 126.5 degrees between Cape of Good Hope and Melbourne = 50.3096 NM per degree at 36 degrees S. Circumference = 18,111 NM globe predicts 17,526 NM
Thus, even if we assume a 1,273 NM ERROR longitude diverges south of the equator, case closed.
Three pages from three engineering text books (custom links to Blogger): http://spin1.flat.wtf ; http://spin2.flat.wtf ; http://spin3.flat.wtf
Custom links to three YouTube videos I did on this topic (plus two more in end screen): http://split1.flat.wtf ; http://split2.flat.wtf ; http://split3.flat.wtf
"And that's the end of the globe!"
A spinning globe is a stack of flywheels, which reduces to a single ring.
00:00 Warm up
06:38 Start, apple, onion, Styrofoam ball
17:30 Styrofoam rings; heavy force zone
27:43 Can break along any longitude (plus Paulster X and his cockamamie conflation)
31:10 "To cut it short and simply put" breaking depends on surface speed, radius cancels out
36:05 Everything reduces to what happens to a single ring
37:00 Closing comments and bonus info (can't see Sun while on equator looking south)
Even if you reduce the distance to 7000 nautical miles (from 7637), you still get 23,000 miles in circumference at 36 degrees, while on the fake globe you get 20,000 miles. And that's the end of the globe! http://www.easysurf.cc/circle.htm#cetol1
"From the same work, we find the distance from Sydney to Wellington (NZ) to be 1,432 miles. The middle latitude is 37½°, and the difference of longitude 23° 36', which gives as the distance round the world at latitude 37½° south, 25,500 statute miles! This distance is again greater than the greatest distance round the 'globe' is said to be and many thousands of miles greater than could be the case on a globe." [Which gives 60.75 nautical miles per degree at 37½° south latitude.]
Is the Bible From Heaven, Is the Earth a Globe?--Alex Gleason. There is a chapter near the end (chapter 19) that contains ship log data that confirms longitude diverges south of the equator. The book is full of flat earth proof. (Direct custom link http://Gleason.flat.wtf ) vaultedearth.files.wordpress.com/2017/02/is-the-bible-from-heaven-is-earth-a-globe.pdf
MUSIC: Matteo Tura - LARSEN youtu.be/bNCjDNjoSJU
Sound track: Do You Hear What I Hear #LIGHTtheWORLD | The Five Strings youtu.be/dZpzv_IDOP8
rockets push off air
3 minutes ago
@Paulster X At no point did the lights appear to move up and down. There was some atmospheric distortion. The curve is the same at Bedford and Rock Lake. But the weather conditions were vastly different, and so was the refraction. But MIRACULOUSLY in both cases, the flags and the lights were lifted up the EXACT AMOUNT they were hiden by the curve! Different refraction, same distances. CLOSE YOUR CHANNEL
TEXT EXCERPTS SHOWN IN VIDEO:
flatearthtextbook.blogspot.com/2016/11/lighthouses.html
From "Music and Morals," by H. R, Haweiss, I extract the following:
"The Antwerp spire is 403 feet high from the foot of the tower; Strasburg measures 468 feet from the level of the sea, but less than 403 feet from the level of the plain. By the clear morning light, from the steeple at Notre Dame at Antwerp, the panorama can hardly be surpassed; 126 steeples may be counted, far and near. Facing northward the Scheldt winds away until it loses itself in a white line, which is none other than the North Sea. By the aid of a telescope ships can be distinguished out on the horizon, and the captains declare they can see the lofty spire at ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILES distant; Middelburg at 75 miles, Fleesing 65 miles, are also visible from the steeple; looking towards Holland, we can distinguish Breda and Walladue, each about 54 miles off."
The above spire would be out of sight A MILE BELOW THE HORIZON, at a distance of 150 miles, and as no telescope can pierce a segment of water, the conclusion is that water is level.
The Earth Review of July, 1894, says: "The Captain of the s.s. Milo, referring to the question as to how far a powerful light can be seen, says: 'The other day, when off Skagen, the rays from Hantsholmen lighthouse were distinctly visible, though the light was fully seventy-two miles away.' Mr. B. wrote and asked how the light could be seen unless the lighthouse was 3,500 feet above sea-level? This is the official reply he received: Editorial Department, Tit-Bits, Dec. 21, 1892. The paragraph you refer to was sent me by the Captain of the s.s. Milo, and he vouched for its accuracy. Under these circumstances I cannot enter into a discussion as to the possibility of his being able to see it or not. P.S.—Mr. B. allowed that the reported observation was made from a mast-head 100 feet above sea-level."
flatearthtextbook.blogspot.com/2016/11/our-earth-motionless.html
But in determining by that principle our scientists have neglected to consider one of the most important points; they forget that the law which makes objects apparently diminishing in proportion to their distance from the observer does not affect luminous bodies; the brighter the light of the body the longer its bulk will remain unchanged in our sight, whereas an object but faintly lighted becomes invisible, as I have said, at a distance which exceeds its diameter 5,000 times. If the said law extended to luminous bodies, then a flame one inch wide could not be seen at the distance of 225 yards, whereas we know from experiment that the size of its apparent bulk does not change even when the candle is carried to a distance of several thousand yards. As the sunlight is extremely bright, the bulk of the sun must therefore seem unchangeable...
EXCELLENT TEST: Ryan Q Vincent 21 minutes ago @paolo salucci Now you are being silly with your 'cannon test!! Here is a possible real test... imagine a line of 6 ft florescent lights end to end for 600 ft at the end of a long runway or flat area. Now, take a camera and start taking photos as you start close to them then back away. How far do you need to be to make the angular size the same as the sun? Does the scaled distance match what you believe about the sun?
Imagine not just one row of lights but many hundreds of vertically as well.
What do you think you will find?
Go check the size of lighthouse lamp areas and how far they can be seen away?
Spot the issues with your reasoning yet?
A flat table was turned into a globe, in a perfect scientific experiment http://lens.flat.wtf (direct link to YouTube video) when DEBUNKED http://spin1.flat.wtf unnatural assumptions were used. The independent variable was the lens, and the dependent variable was the angle of deception (Eratosthenes' 7.2 degree angle, that he was fooled by for not considering the effects of atmospheric lensing)
The video at http://lens.flat.wtf proves that the atmosphere acting as a lens causes the range of Sun heights, from a few to several thousand nautical miles. The range itself proves the Sun is close. The values at the extremities are discarded since they are most prone to error. This leaves 2700 nautical as the BEST estimate of the height of the sun. SMALL LOCAL SUN
BASIC ENGINEERING http://spin1.flat.wtf *No cracked material can spin, and no solid material can spin over 1000 mph w/o exploding way before that.*
My challenge for Globeheads: WITHOUT ANY WILD ASSUMPTIONS (DEBUNKED AT http://spin1.flat.wtf ) show me how the range of heights proves a massive distant sun, parallel light, and a 1000 mph spinning cracked basalt covered ball. When it clearly proves a small local Sun moving over a flat motionless earth, from which the data was derived http://lens.flat.wtf
SCIENCE DOES NOT REQUIRE WILD UNNATURAL ASSUMPTIONS: such as a cracked basalt covered behemoth globe spins like a top over 1000 mph. *Show us that cracked basalt can do this.* Prove cracked basalt can contain trillions of psi of tension (caused by the behemoth globe spinning over 1000 mph see http://spin1.flat.wtf for calculations and pages from engineering textbooks), when it cannot even contain 1 psi. *No cracked material can spin, and no solid material can spin over 1000 mph w/o exploding well before that speed.* FAKE GLOBE.
http://spin1.flat.wtf goes directly to Blogger. You can also click the Blogger icon on the about page of my channel.
COPY INTO YOUTUBE COMMENTS (WILL INSTANTLY BECOME HYPERLINKS):
lens.flat.wtf and for video descriptions use http://lens.flat.wtf
*ERATOSTHENES DEBUNKED FLAT EARTH no he forgot atmosphere is a lens* lens.flat.wtf
range.flat.wtf and for video descriptions use http://range.flat.wtf
*ERATOSTHENES PROVED A SMALL LOCAL SUN over a flat motionless earth Carl Sagan lies exposed* range.flat.wtf
rockets push off air
37 minutes ago
@Andrew Holdaway (Eratosthenes) proved a small local sun over a motionless flat earth, just get rid of the assumptions of a cracked basalt behemoth spinning 1000 mph, parallel light and distant sun. The data requires no assumptions to be properly interpreted. The range proves a small close sun. The values at the extremities are discarded since they are most prone to error. This leaves 2700 nautical as the BEST estimate of the height of the sun. The atmosphere is the reason we don't have thee exact height http://lens.flat.wtf
Then comes two clips from the BS detector, he was a legend on here, made some great vids and disappeared. In the first one he makes an argument for the close sun (very easy to follow, he had a nice way of reducing a topic so that anybody could get the point). The second clip he points out problems with the sun angles and the equator, and he references null school (a website that updates the weather data every three hours or so) he showed how the heat map makes no sense on a tilted globe but makes perfect sense on the Gleason's map with a sun that circles above. In fact, null school no longer allows you to view the heat map on the flat earth map any more, and this video from BS detector had something to do with that.
Then the last two clips, one shows that eclipses don't make sense on the globe (you get a zig zag path of totality) but make perfect sense on the Gleason's map (you get circles when you join the paths of totality). The final clip shows you how well we can focus on the sun and moon (looking straight up into the sky, compared to how poorly we can focus on two people at ground level 1.5 miles away. Making the point that the sun and moon are obviously much closer than claimed by the globe preachers.
One tip for watching the first two clips, is to only read the text overlays.
youtu.be/j7CxsTnfxm0?t=733
You can listen for 5 MINUTES a nice discussion that debunks even more lies about Newton, and what he said about gravity.
Federal Firearms Instructor Edward Hendrie’s book The Greatest Lie On Earth Proof That Our World Is Not A Moving Globe