Why dont they teach simple visual logarithms (and hyperbolic trig)? @Mathologer

Why dont they teach simple visual logarithms (and hyperbolic trig)? @Mathologer

Uploaded August 2023 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago

Simple visual logarithms. Is there such a thing? You bet :)

00:00 Intro
01:59 Rubik's cube and drill
03:26 What's the area?
05:15 Sum of 1+1/2+1/3+...
06:35 Mystery sum
11:32 What base?
17:25 What is Log_b(x)?
22:14 Is this a circle?
28:53 Proof that e^a = cosh(a) + sinh(a)
30:50 Thanks

Maths of spinning cubes by Lingguo Bu
tinyurl.com/yvp5udm6
Great history of hyperbolic functions by Janet Heine Barnett: maa.org/sites/default/files/321922717729.pdf.bannered.pdf
Very good wiki summary of hyperbolic function maths. Check out in particular the section "Comparison with circular functions" and "Relationship to the exponential function"
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic_functions
Squeeze mapping and Lorentz transformation
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_mapping
Minute Physics video "Lorentz Transformations | Special Relativity Ch. 3"
youtu.be/Rh0pYtQG5wI
Stackexchange discussion of the different ways to pronounce the hyperbolic functions:
math.stackexchange.com/questions/176055/pronunciation-of-sinh-x-cosh-x-tanh-x-for-short

Bug alert: The 1 s here youtu.be/G0Fa5Zl-Z3c?t=1270 should be x s :(

Some neat comments: Call the hyperbolic sine and cosine "shine and coshine"
Hmm... the multiplication by halving and doubling looks awfully like Russian multiplication - never thought of a cross link to logarithms before (In the end quite different. Still neat observation.)
-An arc angle may pay you a visit if you sin too much :)

Music: Morning Mandolin by Chris Haugen
T-shirt. Google "Yes, I'm always right!" math t-shirt for many different versions of this t-shirt.

Enjoy!

Burkard

Why dont they teach simple visual logarithms (and hyperbolic trig)?

The 15 puzzle - solving the unsolvable 19th century Rubiks square

The Kakeya needle problem (the squeegee approach)

$Why did we forget this simple visual solution? (Lills method) Todays video is about Lills method, an unexpectedly simple and highly visual way of finding solutions of polynomial equations (using turtles and lasers). After introducing the method I focus on a couple of stunning applications: pretty ways to solve quadratic equations with ruler and compass and cubic equations with origami, Horners form, synthetic division and a newly discovered incarnation of Pascals famous triangle. 00:00 Intro 04:14 Lills method 07:31 Free meal 09:51 Square turtles 11:39 Origami turtles 14:16 Iterative turtles 17:32 QED 24:00 Pascals turtle animation Here is the page with an implementation of Lills method for cubic polynomials that I show in the video. http://www.qedcat.com/misc/lill_method/ Its an adaptation of this webpage http://heim.ifi.uio.no/magho/lill/ (I have not been able to find out who put this together originally). The article that inspired this video is this: Thomas C. Hull, Solving Cubics With Creases: The Work of Beloch and Lill, The American Mathematical Monthly , Vol. 118, No. 4 (April 2011), pp. 307-315. Here is a link to this article on Thomas Hulls webpage: http://mars.wne.edu/~thull/papers/amer.math.monthly.118.04.307-hull.pdf Lills original paper: http://www.numdam.org/article/NAM_1867_2_6 359_0.pdf Other good references include: Polynomials as polygons by Serge Tabachnikov https://www.math.psu.edu/tabachni/prints/Polynomials.pdf Dan Kalmans book Uncommon Mathematical Excursions: Polynomia and Related Realms (the first chapter is about the Horner form and Lills method) https://books.google.com.au/books?id=JPq0pS3wrx4C&pg=PA7&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q&f=false Thank you very much to Marty, Karl and Danil for their help with this video. One version of todays math t-shirt (Zombie addition): https://www.redbubble.com/people/manikx/works/8929883-zombie-math?p=t-shirt The piece of music at the end is called Fresh fallen snow by Chris Haugen from the free YouTube music library. Really neat 1-line Mathematica code for the generation of the Pascal turtle which appeared on Reddit after the video was posted there: Graphics[Table[Line[ReIm[Accumulate[Table[2^(-n/2)Binomial[n,k]Exp[I(4+2k-n)Pi/4],{k,-1,n}]]]],{n,0,7}]] and another nice implementation in Python (with a real turtle graphics turtle) by Alex Hall https://repl.it/repls/DeepskyblueFractalPoint Enjoy :) Mathologer Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mathologer Mathologer PayPal: paypal.me/mathologer (see the Patreon page for details)$

Heron’s formula: What is the hidden meaning of 1 + 2 + 3 = 1 x 2 x 3 ?

The Futurama Theorem

Euler’s Pi Prime Product and Riemann’s Zeta Function

$Pi is IRRATIONAL: animation of a gorgeous proof NEW (Christmas 2019). Two ways to support Mathologer Mathologer Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/mathologer Mathologer PayPal: paypal.me/mathologer (see the Patreon page for details) This video is my best shot at animating and explaining my favourite proof that pi is irrational. It is due to the Swiss mathematician Johann Lambert who published it over 250 years ago. The original write-up by Lambert is 58 pages long and definitely not for the faint of heart (http://www.kuttaka.org/~JHL/L1768b.pdf). On the other hand, among all the proofs of the irrationality of pi, Lamberts proof is probably the most natural one, the one thats easiest to motivate and explain, and one thats ideally suited for the sort of animations that I do. Anyway its been an absolute killer to put this video together and overall this is probably the most ambitious topic Ive tackled so far. I really hope that a lot of you will get something out of it. If you do please let me know :) Also, as usual, please consider contributing subtitles in your native language (English and Russian are under control, but everything else goes). One of the best short versions of Lamberts proof is contained in the book Autour du nombre pi by Jean-Pierre Lafon and Pierre Eymard. In particular, in it the authors calculate an explicit formula for the n-th partial fraction of Lamberts tan x formula; here is a scan with some highlighting by me: http://www.qedcat.com/misc/chopped.png Have a close look and youll see that as n goes to infinity all the highlighted terms approach 1. Whats left are the Maclaurin series for sin x on top and that for cos x at the bottom and this then goes a long way towards showing that those partial fractions really tend to tan x. There is a good summary of other proofs for the irrationality of pi on this wiki page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_that_π_is_irrational Todays main t-shirt I got from from Zazzle: https://www.zazzle.com.au/25_dec_31_oct_t_shirt-235809979886007646 (there are lots of places that sell HO cubed t-shirts) lf you liked this video maybe also consider checking out some of my other videos on irrational and transcendental numbers and on continued fractions and other infinite expressions. The video on continued fractions that I refer to in this video is my video on the most irrational number: https://youtu.be/CaasbfdJdJg Special thanks to my friend Marty Ross for lots of feedback on the slideshow and some good-humoured heckling while we were recording the video. Thank you also to Danil Dimitriev for his ongoing Russian support of this channel. Merry Christmas!$

The ultimate tower of Hanoi algorithm

500 years of NOT teaching THE CUBIC FORMULA. What is it they think you cant handle?

Secrets of the lost number walls

2000 years unsolved: Why is doubling cubes and squaring circles impossible?

Why don't they teach simple visual logarithms (and hyperbolic trig)?