Why anger at the U.N. might not be the best approach. @stealthbadger
Why anger at the U.N. might not be the best approach.  @stealthbadger
Uploaded November 2010 | Updated September 2026, 3 days ago
An important thing this article fails to note: the U.N. - even in its binding resolutions - does not have the authority that local lawmakers do.
thenewcivilrightsmovement.com/un-vote-allowing-gays-to-be-executed-result-of-political-religious-fundamentalism/legislation/2010/11/23/15480

Tip O'Neil once said "all politics is local." He wasn't just fucking around.

Explanation of Vote of the Defamation of Religions Resolution by John Sammis, Deputy U.S. Representative to the Economic and Social Council, in the Third Committee, General Assembly
usun.state.gov/briefing/statements/2010/151904.htm
Why anger at the U.N. might not be the best approach.STFU about the button, GaryA Quick Rant About Magic WordsThe Inner Badger Is Uncivil On the InternetThree things for gothatfunkIm Fine with Being Known as a Gun Nut...Sick Inner Badger Is Sick and TiredDebt Ceiling BluesSexual Harassment and the Straight MalePolitics Is Hard Work - Do It AnywayAdvice to a young creationist!Morality Doesnt Mean What VFX Thinks It Means
stealthbadger |

Why anger at the U.N. might not be the best approach.

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER