@GamersNexus
  @GamersNexus
Gamers Nexus | When Intel’s Efficiency Cores Cause Inefficiency: APO Benchmarks & +30% Performance Tech Demo @GamersNexus | Uploaded November 2023 | Updated October 2024, 6 days ago.
Sponsor: Get 10% off Squarespace purchases (geni.us/BqEpf)
We're benchmarking the Intel APO tool on Intel's new Core i9-14900K CPU. APO is compatible with the "14th Gen" of Intel CPUs, including the i9-14900K and i7-14700K and KF models. This tech demo currently works on two games -- Metro: Exodus & Rainbow Six: Siege -- and boosts performance by better scheduling the threads. We also found that APO reduces inefficiency within the CPU by, somewhat ironically, minimizing E-core involvement in the processing of a heavy gaming workload. Although E-cores may be technically more efficient in their intended use case, like background tasks or lower intensity software, they can get in the way of applications that really just need access to high-performing cores (and maybe not even all of them).

The best way to support our work is through our store: store.gamersnexus.net

Like our content? Please consider becoming our Patron to support us: patreon.com/gamersnexus

TIMESTAMPS

00:00 - Intel E-Core vs. P-Cores & Efficiency
02:10 - Strict Requirements & Big Limitations
06:43 - CPU Utility (APO On vs. APO Off)
07:46 - Max Single Core Load
10:11 - Huge Power Consumption Change
13:33 - Metro: Exodus 1080p/Low Benchmarks (APO vs. No APO)
14:22 - Metro: Exodus 1080p/RTX
14:58 - Rainbow Six Siege APO Benchmarks (14900K)
17:02 - Rainbow Six Siege Power Consumption
17:37 - Concluding Thoughts

** Please like, comment, and subscribe for more! **

Links to Amazon and Newegg are typically monetized on our channel (affiliate links) and may return a commission of sales to us from the retailer. This is unrelated to the product manufacturer. Any advertisements or sponsorships are disclosed within the video ("this video is brought to you by") and above the fold in the description. We do not ever produce paid content or "sponsored content" (meaning that the content is our idea and is not funded externally aside from whatever ad placement is in the beginning) and we do not ever charge manufacturers for coverage.

Follow us in these locations for more gaming and hardware updates:

t: twitter.com/gamersnexus
f: facebook.com/gamersnexus
w: gamersnexus.net

Host, Writing, Testing: Steve Burke
Testing: Mike Gaglione
Video: Vitalii Makhnovets
Broll: Tim Phetdara
When Intel’s Efficiency Cores Cause Inefficiency: APO Benchmarks & +30% Performance Tech DemoLAWSUIT: Lian Li vs. Phanteks & Thermaltake | Special ReportASUS Weird ROG Ally Non-Extreme: Z1 Benchmarks vs. Z1 Extreme AllyHW News - USA Sues Adobe & Bans DeepCool, AMD Targeted by Cybercrime, ASUS MicroSD StatementWe Found Problems: AMD Ryzen 5 8600G & R7 8700G APU Benchmarks & ReviewIntel Fights Back | Arc Battlemage, Xe2 GPUs, & Changing Hyper-ThreadingThermalright Strikes Again: $56.90 360mm Liquid Cooler | Frozen Prism ReviewHW News - Major Windows Privacy Concerns, Noctuas New Fan, AMD Epyc in AM5 DesktopsHW News - Intel P-Core Only CPUs, ASUS Updates, RTX 5090 & Battlemage RumorsBringing Our Written Reviews Back WITHOUT ADS, ft. Wendell of Level1TechsHW News - AMD Leaves High-End GPUs, EK Aftermath, Consumer Protection for ElectronicsAMD Threadripper Motherboards are Insane: TRX50 & WRX90 Board Round-Up

When Intel’s Efficiency Cores Cause Inefficiency: APO Benchmarks & +30% Performance Tech Demo @GamersNexus

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER