@CounterArguments
  @CounterArguments
Counter Arguments | Water Isn't Wet @CounterArguments | Uploaded July 2018 | Updated October 2024, 2 minutes ago.
Argument: Water isn't wet because the term "wet" only describes the surface of something if/when it comes into contact with water (or another liquid).

Counter-Argument: Not every definition of the term "wet" supports this argument, which is not a scientific argument in the first place. According to chemistry, water is wet.

Arguers' Fault: Semantics and self-selected definitions.


Chaz Smith's Argument: youtu.be/ugyqOSUlR2A

Richard Saykally Interview: nautil.us/issue/25/water/ingenious-richard-saykally



Tweet: twitter.com/counterarguing
Post: facebook.com/CounterArguments
Buy: teespring.com/stores/counterarguments
Donate: paypal.me/counterarguments
Email: countertheargument@gmail.com
Water Isnt WetKindness | Beliefs vs ActionsThe Universe Wasnt An AccidentWill Middle Class Taxes Go Up?Dear SubscribersWhat To Make Debates {Episode 02}What Is Online Harassment?Baby, Its Cold OutsideAtheists Have No MoralsReligious LibertyYvette Felarca | FascismBigoted Trolls

Water Isn't Wet @CounterArguments

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER