Uploaded January 2024 | Updated September 2026, 11 hours ago
Robot applications, including 'collaborative robots' – cobots – designed to collaborate with humans, are in high demand, with sales and installation figures constantly on the rise. However, it is necessary to analyse the risks and opportunities of this technology and its possible social, economic, and ethical impacts. The following study presents the current state of collaborative robotics, its benefits, and its disadvantages, with a special emphasis on key aspects such as safety. It presents possible policy options to enable the EU to remain at the forefront of this technology by taking advantage of the opportunities and avoiding the potential risks.
🔎 See the paper publication behind this podcast: Analysis exploring risks and opportunities linked to the use of collaborative industrial robots in Europe ⤵️
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2023)740259
🎧 Subscribe to EPRS Science and Technology Podcasts:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/audio-podcasts.html
Robot applications, including 'collaborative robots' – cobots – designed to collaborate with humans, are in high demand, with sales and installation figures constantly on the rise. However, it is necessary to analyse the risks and opportunities of this technology and its possible social, economic, and ethical impacts. The following study presents the current state of collaborative robotics, its benefits, and its disadvantages, with a special emphasis on key aspects such as safety. It presents possible policy options to enable the EU to remain at the forefront of this technology by taking advantage of the opportunities and avoiding the potential risks.
🔎 See the paper publication behind this podcast: Analysis exploring risks and opportunities linked to the use of collaborative industrial robots in Europe ⤵️
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2023)740259
🎧 Subscribe to EPRS Science and Technology Podcasts:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/audio-podcasts.html
![Recognition of parenthood between EU countries [Policy Podcast]
Families in the European Union (EU) are increasingly likely to move and travel between the EU Member States. Yet, given the differences in Member States laws, parents can face difficulties in having their parenthood recognised when crossing borders within the EU. Non‑recognition in one Member State of parenthood established in another Member State can have significant adverse consequences for children and their parents who are moving to another Member State or returning to their Member State of origin.
Subscribe to EPRS Policy Podcasts: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/audio-podcasts.html
See the paper publication behind this podcast:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2023)754562 Recognition of parenthood between EU countries [Policy Podcast]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q314a0iM28A/mqdefault.jpg)
![What if Europe championed new AI hardware? [Science and Technology Podcast]
Current state-of-the-art hardware is not optimised for machine learning, and both academic and private sector research is already leading to new designs. At the same time, the need for more time- and energy-efficient machine-learning hardware is increasing as more consumers and companies want access to machine-learning applications. The EU has the opportunity to leverage its strong regulatory framework for AI products as a mark of trust and safety, while also investing to support the next generation of hardware, opening up a new market for Europes high tech industry. What would happen if the EU formulated a cohesive plan to support these technologies through both research and economic policy?
See the publication behind this podcast:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_ATA(2024)762881
🎧 Listen to our podcasts reporting on the latest science and technology developments, looking into the impact they will have on our lives and capturing their policy implications:
iTunes: https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/european-parliament-eprs-science/id1110775762?mt=2
Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/6XP9MnZdCDTnyDWXeDdnPx
YouTube Music: https://music.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLPPfzoqPUImWL0O8VTtTNK1DTxiWxLJow&si=CBMMt4RYOllhxBbz
#AI What if Europe championed new AI hardware? [Science and Technology Podcast]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/q8qJWZQPpFM/mqdefault.jpg)
![EPRS Conference on Foresight and Better Law-Making | Legislating for Future Generations | Session 2
Legislating for Future Generations: Trends and Challenges in Impact Assessment and Anticipatory Policy-Making
EPRS Conference on Foresight and Better Law-Making | Thursday 7 March and Friday 8 March 2024
Session 2: How to link Foresight with Impact Assessment in Anticipatory Policy-Making?
Roundtable with:
Elisabetta SIRACUSA, Member of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board, European Commission
Suzana ANGHEL, Policy Analyst, Policy Foresight Unit, EPRS, and
Irmi ANGLMAYER, Policy Analyst, Ex-Ante Impact Assessment Unit, EPRS
Tine ANDERSEN, Expert from Danish Technological Institute
Pieter CABOOR, Director of the Legal Department of the Belgian House of Representatives [the intervention was cut at Mr Caboors request]
Moderator: Zoltan PETHŐ, Head of the Ex-ante Impact Assessment Unit, EPRS
What is this event about?
A few months ahead of the 2024 European elections and of the definition of EU priorities for 2024-2029, time has come to assess the role of the 2021 Better Regulation framework supporting co-legislators when drafting EU legislation, which for the first time included foresight in the EU legislative toolbox.
In the meantime, the EU and its Member States are faced with an unprecedented number of major challenges at geopolitical, geo-economic, climate change and democratic levels. How the EU will respond in quantitative and qualitative terms will impact the life of EU citizens and of our future generations.
By definition, foresight can in no way predict what may happen but is a convincing method to try and reduce uncertainties, analyse risks, prepare mitigation measures, be prepared for new opportunities and help decision-makers make the right choices. This conference intends to bring together experts from EU institutions and national parliaments but also from key international partners to learn about best practices and pave the way for further cooperation.
EPRS publication related to this event: The use of strategic foresight in Commission impact assessments: Existing practices and the way forward: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2024/757801/EPRS_BRI(2024)757801_EN.pdf EPRS Conference on Foresight and Better Law-Making | Legislating for Future Generations | Session 2](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/qSIANfdB0Hw/mqdefault.jpg)





![What if the EU were energy independent? [Science and Technology Podcast]
The EU depends on imported fossil fuels (gas, oil and coal) for about 56 % of its energy needs (gross energy consumption), which in 2021 represented an energy bill of around EUR 300 billion. The domestic production of renewable energy sources has increased significantly in recent years to 22 % of total demand. The European Union can aspire to achieve energy independence through the deployment of existing and emerging technologies. Electrification, renewables and energy storage could reduce EUs reliance on conventional fossil fuels. What are the developments, expectations, concerns and societal implications associated with these technologies? What initiatives and policies can lead to a resilient EU energy system by anticipating impacts?
See the publication behind this podcast:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_ATA(2023)753182
Subscribe to EPRS Science and Technology Podcasts:
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/audio-podcasts.html What if the EU were energy independent? [Science and Technology Podcast]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sIFXHwZmR64/mqdefault.jpg)

![EPRS policy roundtable: The next EU long-term budget: Spending challenges and revenue options
Parliaments two co-rapporteurs on the next Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF), Carla Tavares (S&D, PT) and Siegfried Mureșan (EPP, RO) were invited to participate in the EPRS policy roundtable on The next EU long-term budget: Spending challenges and revenue options. They were joined by Eulalia Rubio of the Jacques Delors Institute in Paris to discuss, which policy challenges the next MFF will have to finance, such as security and defence, support for Ukraine, competitiveness and the repayment of NGEU-related debt. Furthermore, they discussed whether we need new own resources and more debt to finance the next MFF?
This EPRS policy roundtable took place on 25 June 2025
[when MEP Tavares spoke Portugese her speech was translated to English by an interpreter]
Speakers include:
Carla TAVARES, Member, co-rapporteur of Parliament’s MFF own-initiative report
Siegfried MUREșAN, Member, co-rapporteur of Parliament’s MFF own initiative report
Eulalia RUBIO, Senior Research Fellow on European economic affairs at the Jacques Delors Institute, Paris
Welcome by Sarah SHEIL, Director for the Members Research Service, European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS)
Moderation by Tim PETERS, Head of the Budgetary Policies Unit, EPRS
EPRS publications:
Future of EU long-term financing: Post-2027 needs and how to finance them: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2025)767242
Budgetary Outlook of the European Union 2025: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_STU(2025)769563 EPRS policy roundtable: The next EU long-term budget: Spending challenges and revenue options](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/sfkJompSgbQ/mqdefault.jpg)