Unpacking Government Speech On Social Media @LegalesePodcast
Unpacking Government Speech On Social Media  @LegalesePodcast
Uploaded March 2024 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
Episode # 77

Today we are discussing the first two case wrap-ups in my annual Supreme Court Roundup. On Friday, the Supreme Court handed down two decisions that deal with the extent to which a government employee is engaging in state action when posting on social media.
These cases are Lindke v Freed and O'Conner-Ratcliff v Garnier.
The government would create a new legal test that is to be applied to determine whether a government official is acting in their official capacity on social media, and therefor looking at when and how a decision to delete a comment or block a user from their social media page constitutes a first amendment violation.

Follow & Support
Subscribe To Legalese Newsletter - legaleseshow.com
Legalese Homepage - legalesepodcast.com
“Constitutional Sleight Of Hand: An explicit history of implied powers” Now Available on Amazon - amazon.com/dp/B0BN93R9QX

Contact Me - Bob@legaleseshow.com

Legalese is a podcast that discusses all things constitutional law as well as current events in politics and other areas of law.
Unpacking Government Speech On Social MediaToday In Supreme Court History: United States v Cruikshank (1876)Blue On Blue Violence: Why Police Are Shooting Police & How Its All Your FaultRittenhouse: The ClosingBiden Beclowns Himself Over The Debt LimitHeart Of The Constitution: The Bill Of Rights As A Term Of Art (Part II)SCOTUS Roundup 2023 - Gun Rights & The Second AmendmentThe Fourteenth Amendment: What It Says And What It MeansClarence Thomas Is RightRittenhouse Trial 2: Electric Boogaloo (Can Kyle Rittenhouse sue politicians & media for defamation)Bidens Ministry Of Truth - Part OneMajor Supreme Court Update
Legalese |

Unpacking Government Speech On Social Media

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER