@techperspectives
  @techperspectives
Tech Perspectives | United States v. Microsoft - Why Microsoft Hasn't Violated the Antitrust Laws @techperspectives | Uploaded October 2012 | Updated October 2024, 1 hour ago.
March 26, 1999 - Hartford, CT - Charles Rule, a partner at Covington & Burling, talks about the proper standard for identifying truly monopolistic practices and why Microsoft hasn't violated the antitrust laws at the 1999 Wiggin & Dana Symposium at the University of Connecticut School of Law. Sponsored by Wiggin & Dana, and run by the Connecticut Law Review, the conference discusses what some have declared to be the antitrust trial of the century.

Copyright 1999

Note: This video may only be used for purposes such as criticism, review, private study, scholarship, or research.
United States v. Microsoft - Why Microsoft Hasnt Violated the Antitrust LawsCreative Commons: Accomplishments and discerning futuresSCO v IBM: Defending Intellectual Property [6 of 11]Computer Chronicles - Compaq Deskpro 386Sun Microsystems and Java Open Source Software - Java Open Source Software Q&AComputer Chronicles: The Atari 520ST and Jack TramielComputer Chronicles - Macintosh IIGPLv3 and LGPLv3 have been releasedHow HP Benefits from Debian 7/7

United States v. Microsoft - Why Microsoft Hasn't Violated the Antitrust Laws @techperspectives

SHARE TO X SHARE TO REDDIT SHARE TO FACEBOOK WALLPAPER