Uploaded February 2023 | Updated September 2026, 2 weeks ago
The market can't save us.
Gary Mongiovi (@StJohnsU) scrutinizes the conflicting messages of our foundational economic/political thinkers, suggesting a little honest perspective could go a long way in terms of getting society back on track.
Learn more about Professor Mongiovi and his courses at:
https://www.stjohns.edu/academics/faculty/gary-v-mongiovi-phd
Explore his prominent research and works by reading:
Pierangelo Garegnani, the Classical Surplus Approach and Demand-led Growth: Introduction to the Symposium
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09538259.2015.1026092
Was Keynes a Socialist
catalyst-journal.com/2020/03/was-keynes-a-socialist
Poking a Hornets’ Nest: The Debate on Democracy in Chains
emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/0743-4154
Vulgar economy in Marxian garb: a critique of Temporal Single System Marxism
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/048661340203400401?journalCode=rrpa
The market can't save us.
Gary Mongiovi (@StJohnsU) scrutinizes the conflicting messages of our foundational economic/political thinkers, suggesting a little honest perspective could go a long way in terms of getting society back on track.
Learn more about Professor Mongiovi and his courses at:
https://www.stjohns.edu/academics/faculty/gary-v-mongiovi-phd
Explore his prominent research and works by reading:
Pierangelo Garegnani, the Classical Surplus Approach and Demand-led Growth: Introduction to the Symposium
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09538259.2015.1026092
Was Keynes a Socialist
catalyst-journal.com/2020/03/was-keynes-a-socialist
Poking a Hornets’ Nest: The Debate on Democracy in Chains
emerald.com/insight/publication/issn/0743-4154
Vulgar economy in Marxian garb: a critique of Temporal Single System Marxism
journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/048661340203400401?journalCode=rrpa
![The Intangibles Era [Rohinton Medhora]
The future of work is already here—but our social policies are stuck in the past.
In a world driven by technology, intangibles, and shifting work patterns, INET Governing Board Chairman Rohinton Medhora urges a bold rethinking of how we support people across their lifetime.
Produced by Nick Alpha & Matthew Kulvicki The Intangibles Era [Rohinton Medhora]](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/xUERWn46oUQ/mqdefault.jpg)








![Political Economy of Climate Disruption - [ECO]NOMICS Part 2
Mainstream economists like to talk about choosing between climate protection and consumption. They often produce studies showing that policy action is too expensive, while climate change itself is not too costly. But a well-functioning climate is the basis for producing goods and services, not an alternative to them.
In part 2 of [ECO]NOMICS, Professor Juliet Shor introduces the political economy approach to climate change, as an alternative to the usual economics. This direction links action and inaction to economic and political interests. Who has interests in continuing to emit greenhouse gases, who is benefiting, and who is bearing the costs? Political economy turns the focus on the companies, countries and people who are disproportionately responsible and have a strong interest in the status quo. Prof. Schor shows how fossil fuel companies have spent vast amounts of money and effort in influencing public opinion and capturing politicians, to forestall government action on climate change. Solving the political economy problem requires new ways of thinking about transcending the interest-based politics that has led to climate inaction.
Part 3 will be available May 11, 2022
Learn more at https://www.ineteconomics.org/perspectives/videos/eco-nomics
Credits: Juliet Schor, Matthew Kulvicki, Nick Alpha, Gonçalo Fonseca, Kurt Semm Political Economy of Climate Disruption - [ECO]NOMICS Part 2](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/yjC4eVLxo6I/mqdefault.jpg)
